The aesthetic thread aka "Fugly"

Discussion relating to the operations of real railways together with the experiences of the people who work (or have worked) on them.

Moderator: Moderators

User avatar
thenudehamster
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 5029
Joined: Wed Sep 10, 2003 7:56 pm
Location: Somewhere in cyberspace
Contact:

Re: The aesthetic thread aka "Fugly"

Post by thenudehamster »

Couple of points, one to clarify a few things, one an opinion:
First, it's cheaper to build in the USA because the pound sterling is considerably higher in value than it used to be. This makes dollars comparatively cheap, so a loco which costs, shall we say, two million dollars to build in the USA, might well cost two million pounds to build in the UK. The US cost equates to only about one point three million pounds, so the logic is easy to see. A general rule of thumb if you're comparing is that whatever it costs in dollars over there, is probably numerically about the same as what it would cost in pounds over here. They're possibly a little cheaper to build over there because most US engines are two-stroke, therefore simpler mechanically, though I don't know precisely which engines they'll use in this new one. Most of the development work for the componentry - engine, transmissions, bogies, motors, etc. has already been done, so the cost of that does not have to be factored in, which it would be for a UK built machine - including designing or importing a suitable engine - and costs go up still further. Not only that, but the locomotive building capability of any of the UK's former works was run down donkey's years back; such manufacturing capability we still have is all MU based. It has little to do with build quality, reliability, or labour relations directly; it's pure economics.

The opinion is simple: How could anyone have designed anything of such pure and unrelieved ugliness? The Class 58 was an attempt at a nice looking loco that nearly made it, but not quite. The Class 66 was an exercise in elegance. The 67 was a classic example of how not to design simplistically; it may have had simple lines, but the proportions were all wrong, and the angles and curves poorly realised. It had no 'presence', which the 66 has in abundance.
This new thing takes all the worst features of the old 58 and combines them with the worst of the 67 into a nightmare. Yuk!
BarryH - thenudehamster
(nothing to do with unclothed pet rodents -- it's just where I used to live)
-----------------
Any opinion expressed above is herein warranted to be worth exactly what you paid for it.
User avatar
AlistairW
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 1465
Joined: Sat Dec 24, 2005 6:44 pm
Location: London North Eastern

Re: The aesthetic thread aka "Fugly"

Post by AlistairW »

The engines will be GE J616 which although proven are only proven as natural gas engines (the train ones will be diesel :wink: ) starting static generators and will be 4-stoke.
User avatar
jbilton
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 19267
Joined: Fri Oct 10, 2003 12:08 pm
Location: At home ..waiting to go to Work.
Contact:

Re: The aesthetic thread aka "Fugly"

Post by jbilton »

Hi
I wonder how it will sound ....... lets hope for lots of noise and clag... :o

As the article has moved from the original link

Image

http://www.railwaygazette.com/news/sing ... wse/4.html

I must be in my own camp as I prefer 67s over 66s ........ paint one in BR Blueand they would look great.

Could be worse............ :lol:

Image

Cheers
Jon
------------------------Supporting whats good in the British community------------------------
Image
User avatar
buffy500
Mr DMU
Posts: 6794
Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2001 12:00 am
Location: Getting on all the right people's nerves !
Contact:

Re: The aesthetic thread aka "Fugly"

Post by buffy500 »

Is that the Manchester & Liverpool spec class 66 ?
Image
User avatar
jbilton
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 19267
Joined: Fri Oct 10, 2003 12:08 pm
Location: At home ..waiting to go to Work.
Contact:

Re: The aesthetic thread aka "Fugly"

Post by jbilton »

buffy500 wrote:Is that the Manchester & Liverpool spec class 66 ?
Eear watch it lar ......(in a scouse accent)........ :lol:

I previously forgot to add that the steel workers of Scunthorpe might not be quite so pleased with American imports ....... but perhaps they can complain to their newly elected BNP European MP.
I wonder if the now German owned railway will start to order at least European locos..... either that or go back to sinking American ships mid Atlantic.. :lol:

Cheers
Jon
------------------------Supporting whats good in the British community------------------------
Image
User avatar
jbilton
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 19267
Joined: Fri Oct 10, 2003 12:08 pm
Location: At home ..waiting to go to Work.
Contact:

Re: The aesthetic thread aka "Fugly"

Post by jbilton »

Hi
I cant help thinking the designer got some help from these

Image

Cheers
Jon
------------------------Supporting whats good in the British community------------------------
Image
User avatar
alexnick
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 1827
Joined: Wed Mar 15, 2006 10:12 pm
Location: 70C

Re: The aesthetic thread aka "Fugly"

Post by alexnick »

jbilton wrote:
buffy500 wrote:Is that the Manchester & Liverpool spec class 66 ?
Eear watch it lar ......(in a scouse accent)........ :lol:

I previously forgot to add that the steel workers of Scunthorpe might not be quite so pleased with American imports ....... but perhaps they can complain to their newly elected BNP European MP.
I wonder if the now German owned railway will start to order at least European locos..... either that or go back to sinking American ships mid Atlantic.. :lol:

Cheers
Jon
But would the Germans know what to do with all these unelectrified lines? And the main German freight-hauling diesels are Russian built anyway.

AN
User avatar
jbilton
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 19267
Joined: Fri Oct 10, 2003 12:08 pm
Location: At home ..waiting to go to Work.
Contact:

Re: The aesthetic thread aka "Fugly"

Post by jbilton »

alexnick wrote: But would the Germans know what to do with all these unelectrified lines? And the main German freight-hauling diesels are Russian built anyway.

AN
Ahh ... Russian diesels .......... now you're talking. :D
I'd love to see them things clagging past my house anyday.
Is there a Russian word for silencer ... :lol:

Cheers
Jon
------------------------Supporting whats good in the British community------------------------
Image
User avatar
Wikkus
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 3480
Joined: Tue Dec 04, 2001 12:00 am
Location: Malta

Re: The aesthetic thread aka "Fugly"

Post by Wikkus »

jbilton wrote: Ahh ... Russian diesels .......... now you're talking. :D
I'd love to see them things clagging past my house anyday.
:o

Really?! Or is my sarcasm filter defective?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LH6TgfseK_4

Say what you like about the aesthetic appeal (or otherwise) of the GE thing that I set this thread off with, but sure as eggs is eggs it'll be a saint in terms of emissions compared to this beast.

Rik.
User avatar
arabiandisco
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 3496
Joined: Mon May 10, 2004 9:49 am
Location: The Church of Noise
Contact:

Re: The aesthetic thread aka "Fugly"

Post by arabiandisco »

That thing is overfuelling to a ridiculous degree to be making that much smoke. Some kind of turbo fault perhaps? No way is that normal & correct operation...

And no, the truck isn't ugly at all. I'd still rather see that GE thing pulling freight than the most aesthetically pleasing truck you could imagine...
Having a brain bypass
Go 49ers
User avatar
Wikkus
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 3480
Joined: Tue Dec 04, 2001 12:00 am
Location: Malta

Re: The aesthetic thread aka "Fugly"

Post by Wikkus »

arabiandisco wrote:That thing is overfuelling to a ridiculous degree to be making that much smoke. Some kind of turbo fault perhaps? No way is that normal & correct operation...

And no, the truck isn't ugly at all. I'd still rather see that GE thing pulling freight than the most aesthetically pleasing truck you could imagine...
Heh, check out some of the related vids in the list, including this gem:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wEETEOcQ ... re=related

Cheers, Rik.
User avatar
jbilton
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 19267
Joined: Fri Oct 10, 2003 12:08 pm
Location: At home ..waiting to go to Work.
Contact:

Re: The aesthetic thread aka "Fugly"

Post by jbilton »

Hi
Thanks for them Rik ......... brilliant.
I'm back onto my Russian MSTS soon. :P

Cheers
Jon
------------------------Supporting whats good in the British community------------------------
Image
MCR247
Been on the forums for a while
Posts: 190
Joined: Sun Nov 05, 2006 7:36 pm

Re: The aesthetic thread aka "Fugly"

Post by MCR247 »

I guess thats their Class 37, and to them, our 37 is their eco friendly loco! :p
User avatar
overmarze
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 3155
Joined: Fri Jul 15, 2005 9:29 pm
Location: Essex

The new class 70 ??? Ugly mother lol

Post by overmarze »

No way this cant be?

http://twitpic.com/9vhyq
User avatar
jbilton
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 19267
Joined: Fri Oct 10, 2003 12:08 pm
Location: At home ..waiting to go to Work.
Contact:

Re: The new class 70 ??? Ugly mother lol

Post by jbilton »

------------------------Supporting whats good in the British community------------------------
Image
Locked

Return to “Real Railway Discussion”