Top Gear and Tornado

Discussion relating to the operations of real railways together with the experiences of the people who work (or have worked) on them.

Moderator: Moderators

User avatar
ilovequo
Been on the forums for a while
Posts: 283
Joined: Tue Nov 30, 2004 6:36 pm
Location: Shipley between Bradford and Keighley

Top Gear and Tornado

Post by ilovequo »

Hi

Just to let people know that Top Gears new series starts this Sunday (21st June) and it is showing the Tornado race - thinkI may watch that
User avatar
johncas
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 1613
Joined: Tue Jan 15, 2002 12:00 am
Location: THURNBY LODGE, LEICESTER UK 15 Mins from GCR Leicester Nortn
Contact:

Re: Top Gear and Tornado

Post by johncas »

Better watch it best thing on TV tonight

Now Clarkson in the Tornado lost to James May in a car

NOW BR always said it's Quicker by rail
I would of thought by the time you have drove out of London with all the traffic the train would of got a head start and the A1 is only a motorway for a bit then a A road so train would be faster probably if they had been in a IC225 train would of got there first if you do Leicester to London that is quicker by train

If you missed if it is available on the BBC Iplayer uk only
My spec is 9.0ghz 4GB ram High Spec ATI gaming Graphics Card 32" TV as Monitor
THE UK BUS FORUMS http://leicesterbus.proboards10.com
My Youtube videos http://uk.youtube.com/user/johncas1
My fotopic album http://johncasingena6499.fotoblog.co.uk/
aniceguy
Been on the forums for a while
Posts: 114
Joined: Sat Feb 07, 2009 2:54 pm
Contact:

Re: Top Gear and Tornado

Post by aniceguy »

Beat em to this. Here is the link to watch it on BBC iPlayer:

http://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episode/b0 ... w_series)/

ABSOLUTELY FANTASTIC ! :D
My FS & MSTS Projects are now available (click on my signature image)

Image
User avatar
LeeEAS
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 3318
Joined: Tue May 31, 2005 3:21 pm
Location: Photographing trains or bashing claggy tractors
Contact:

Re: Top Gear and Tornado

Post by LeeEAS »

I feel the train was cheated, they basically compared WW2 road vehicles with what is almost a modern freight locomotive, due to its speed limit of 75mph, A1s had a top speed of 100mph. They claimed the loco was completed 3 years ago?? It was finished last year! They claimed the loco had to stop 4 times on the way up, nonsense, the line had water troughs back in 1949 and the train only had to stop once en-route which would have been York. :-?

I thought it was pretty rubbish, the only two decent bits were seeing the loco at speed from the helicopter and Clarkson's face covered in soot. 8)
Cheers, Lee Scott. [aka 37518]
Image
My Specs: Intel i7 950 @ 3.07GHz, Crucial 12GB DDR3 1600 memory, GeForce GTX 470 1.25GB Graphics.
ralph0chadkirk
Established Forum Member
Posts: 309
Joined: Mon Jan 05, 2009 6:13 pm

Re: Top Gear and Tornado

Post by ralph0chadkirk »

They claimed the loco had to stop 4 times on the way up, nonsense, the line had water troughs back in 1949 and the train only had to stop once en-route which would have been York.
No they didn't. They said that during the race it has to stop 4 times to top up on water and coal. The same as the bike and the car had to stop for petrol many times.
I feel the train was cheated, they basically compared WW2 road vehicles with what is almost a modern freight locomotive, due to its speed limit of 75mph, A1s had a top speed of 100mph
When the bike and the car can only go 70mph, the train had the advantage.
Image
User avatar
staticxfreak
Well Established Forum Member
Posts: 659
Joined: Sat Aug 30, 2003 4:59 pm
Location: Darwen, Lancashire, England
Contact:

Re: Top Gear and Tornado

Post by staticxfreak »

ralph0chadkirk wrote:
They claimed the loco had to stop 4 times on the way up, nonsense, the line had water troughs back in 1949 and the train only had to stop once en-route which would have been York.
No they didn't. They said that during the race it has to stop 4 times to top up on water and coal. The same as the bike and the car had to stop for petrol many times.
I feel the train was cheated, they basically compared WW2 road vehicles with what is almost a modern freight locomotive, due to its speed limit of 75mph, A1s had a top speed of 100mph
When the bike and the car can only go 70mph, the train had the advantage.
You've took what he's saying in the wrong way. What he's saying is that if it was actually 1949 then the train would easily win.
It's all about the sound!!! :) (Excluding unit's, electric's, kettles and for now 57's, 66's and 67's)
User avatar
arabiandisco
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 3496
Joined: Mon May 10, 2004 9:49 am
Location: The Church of Noise
Contact:

Re: Top Gear and Tornado

Post by arabiandisco »

It's an entertainment program about cars. The car nearly always beats whatever it's racing against...

If it were 1949, then there would have been countless differences - no half-hour coal stops to hold the train up, no 75mph limit (though I doubt linespeed was that much more than that), and the train would have been considerably shorter, too. Also, the roads in 1949 were a lot worse - no motorways or anything like that.

Despite the eventual result, it was a popular TV program showing some positive scenes of rail as a mode of transport - impressive beasts those kettles, and you could tell clarkson was impressed by the fact that it was possible to spin the wheels on something that heavy at 70mph... But it isn't really that important, it's entertainment... And I thought it was entertaining.
Having a brain bypass
Go 49ers
Drogba11CFC
Well Established Forum Member
Posts: 928
Joined: Fri May 09, 2008 9:48 am

Re: Top Gear and Tornado

Post by Drogba11CFC »

Tornado would still have won if that commuter train hadn't gotten in the way!
Chelsea FC 2009/10 Premier League Champions and FA Cup winners
Currently reached: AP4
User avatar
LeeEAS
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 3318
Joined: Tue May 31, 2005 3:21 pm
Location: Photographing trains or bashing claggy tractors
Contact:

Re: Top Gear and Tornado

Post by LeeEAS »

staticxfreak wrote:You've took what he's saying in the wrong way. What he's saying is that if it was actually 1949 then the train would easily win.
Correct, if anyone was paying attention at the beginning of the episode, Clarkson read out the letter they had received and I quote:
"What would your show be like if it had been done 60 years ago"

I.e. Using the exact methods that were available in 1949. Modern Health & Safely measures rigged the race so that the car won... :-?
Cheers, Lee Scott. [aka 37518]
Image
My Specs: Intel i7 950 @ 3.07GHz, Crucial 12GB DDR3 1600 memory, GeForce GTX 470 1.25GB Graphics.
User avatar
phat2003uk
SWTVR Assistant Manager
Posts: 7452
Joined: Thu Aug 08, 2002 5:52 pm

Re: Top Gear and Tornado

Post by phat2003uk »

I don't think this should be taken too seriously! Was just a nice time. :)
User avatar
spartacus
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 3461
Joined: Sat May 04, 2002 12:00 am
Location: Dewsbury
Contact:

Re: Top Gear and Tornado

Post by spartacus »

How in all that is holy did H&S have anything to do with the result?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!
"I am not a number, I am a free man!"
No to I.D. cards.
User avatar
AlistairW
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 1465
Joined: Sat Dec 24, 2005 6:44 pm
Location: London North Eastern

Re: Top Gear and Tornado

Post by AlistairW »

phat2003uk wrote:I don't think this should be taken too seriously! Was just a nice time. :)
What Richard said.

Fantastic show and very entertaining. As has been mentioned elsewhere the train arrived ontime irrespective of the stopper. It was good to hear both May and Clarkson take their hats off to that loco, a wondeful machine.
User avatar
tigermon
Well Established Forum Member
Posts: 736
Joined: Wed Jul 03, 2002 5:23 am

Re: Top Gear and Tornado

Post by tigermon »

spartacus wrote:How in all that is holy did H&S have anything to do with the result?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!
It's a scapegoat, anything that you "can't do anymore" is down to the H&S brigade. Normally it comes from people who want to do something dangerous, like ride a motorbike without a helmet and in their underpants at 150mph down the M1 at rush-hour.
User avatar
spartacus
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 3461
Joined: Sat May 04, 2002 12:00 am
Location: Dewsbury
Contact:

Re: Top Gear and Tornado

Post by spartacus »

First time I've heard of H&S inspectorate being blamed for something done in the late 60s! :wink:
"I am not a number, I am a free man!"
No to I.D. cards.
User avatar
LeeEAS
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 3318
Joined: Tue May 31, 2005 3:21 pm
Location: Photographing trains or bashing claggy tractors
Contact:

Re: Top Gear and Tornado

Post by LeeEAS »

spartacus wrote:How in all that is holy did H&S have anything to do with the result?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!
As posted in my original message "A1s had a top speed of 100mph". Modern safety measures limit Tornado to 75mph, thus significantly reducing its chance of winning. Combined with the fact there are now no water troughs en-route like there would have been in 1949, meaning the loco had to stop 3 times more than it should have done. The race was to see which mode of transport would have won had the race taken place back in 1949, but they failed to even use the methods that were around at the time, if the race had been done fairly the train would have won.
Cheers, Lee Scott. [aka 37518]
Image
My Specs: Intel i7 950 @ 3.07GHz, Crucial 12GB DDR3 1600 memory, GeForce GTX 470 1.25GB Graphics.
Locked

Return to “Real Railway Discussion”