Anyone here use Gmax for modelling??

Learn the finer points of making your own engines and wagons!

Moderator: Moderators

Locked
jonnysmooth
Been on the forums for a while
Posts: 136
Joined: Tue Oct 01, 2002 2:57 pm

Anyone here use Gmax for modelling??

Post by jonnysmooth »

Hi there,

I'm a relative newbie to these forums and have been lurking in the Trainz forum.

Someone there has asked about swapping models with MSTS users... I've created tons of GWR models using Gmax and wondered if this was also used for MSTS for building models??

I'd be willing to swap models if there are any out there.... I dunno if the polycounts will be to your taste though from reading a few threads in here!

Cheers!

Jonny
User avatar
saddletank
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 14183
Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2001 12:00 am
Location: UK East Midlands

Post by saddletank »

Yes, GMax can export to MSTS .s file format.
Martin
_______________________________________
ED209: "Please put down your weapon. You have 20 seconds to comply."
User avatar
mikesimpson
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 6361
Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2001 12:00 am
Location: Southern Hemisphere Penal Colonies
Contact:

Post by mikesimpson »

Hi Jonny,

On the Microsoft Games page there is a plug in for Gmax which allows you to export to MSTS, this works in a similar manner to the Trainz plug in.

A few users have managed to produce models for both systems, but as you surmised, there are problems with polygons and textures.
Mike in OZ - Author of TS-Tools & Route-Riter.
http://www.agenetools.com
I'm not arguing (just explaining why I'm right).
User avatar
3DTrains
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 1090
Joined: Wed Nov 20, 2002 11:08 am
Location: Another Planet
Contact:

Post by 3DTrains »

mikesimpson wrote:there are problems with polygons and textures.
And what would those polygon and texture problems be? I've been using Gmax since release, and other than the inability to render, it works perfectly. FWIW, the current set of F and E-units on my site were created in Gmax, as well as the additional models I created for the 3DTS Cajon Pass addon.
Cheers!
Marc - 3DTrains

Image
User avatar
mikesimpson
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 6361
Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2001 12:00 am
Location: Southern Hemisphere Penal Colonies
Contact:

Post by mikesimpson »

3DTrains wrote:
mikesimpson wrote:there are problems with polygons and textures.
And what would those polygon and texture problems be? I've been using Gmax since release, and other than the inability to render, it works perfectly. FWIW, the current set of F and E-units on my site were created in Gmax, as well as the additional models I created for the 3DTS Cajon Pass addon.
Hi Marc,

It has been reported several times on here that if a model was designed for Trainz , imported into Gmax, then re-exported to MSTS that the polygon numbers were very high.

I think the original posting here was regarding the ability of Gmax to move models from Trainz to MSTS, hence my response.

I know Gmax works fine for building MSTS models from scratch.

Regards
Mike in OZ - Author of TS-Tools & Route-Riter.
http://www.agenetools.com
I'm not arguing (just explaining why I'm right).
User avatar
3DTrains
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 1090
Joined: Wed Nov 20, 2002 11:08 am
Location: Another Planet
Contact:

Post by 3DTrains »

Hi Mike,

Gmax only triangulates the polys during 3DS import and MSTS/Trainz export. This may be where some of the confusion occurs, as it doesn't add anything to the polycounts (which may be misinterpreted in other 3D software). :)
Cheers!
Marc - 3DTrains

Image
User avatar
decapod
Building GWR Highworth Branch 1917-1926
Posts: 3097
Joined: Tue Dec 04, 2001 12:00 am
Location: Carshalton, Surrey
Contact:

Post by decapod »

True, there really should be no difference in count between models exported to either sim.

However it seems trainz can handle larger counts than MSTS so the models tend to be slightly less efficient (because they can be), so they're probably not suitable for running in MSTS. MSTS also requires a certain hierarchy naming and material naming convention so there may be some effort required to convert them.
DECAPOD
OOOOO
jonnysmooth
Been on the forums for a while
Posts: 136
Joined: Tue Oct 01, 2002 2:57 pm

Post by jonnysmooth »

Ah maybe not as efficient but including beautiful curves and rounded edges where needed.
User avatar
saddletank
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 14183
Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2001 12:00 am
Location: UK East Midlands

Post by saddletank »

Well you can have beautiful curves and rounded edges if you like but your game may run a little slow ;)
Martin
_______________________________________
ED209: "Please put down your weapon. You have 20 seconds to comply."
Locked

Return to “[MSTS1] Building Rolling Stock”