minimum FPS one should get in MSTS to make it "realistic"?

General MSTS related discussion that doesn't really fit into any of the other specific forums.

Moderator: Moderators

Locked
gm071class
Getting the hang of things now
Posts: 24
Joined: Fri Jul 01, 2005 9:36 am

minimum FPS one should get in MSTS to make it "realistic"?

Post by gm071class »

Hi friends,

what it the minimum FPS one should have in MSTS to make it "realistic"?

How can you see your FPS onscreen?

thanks
User avatar
gswindale
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 6118
Joined: Sat Sep 30, 2006 2:58 pm
Location: At a PC if I'm online :-)

Re: minimum FPS one should get in MSTS to make it "realistic"?

Post by gswindale »

I find 20-30 fps looks fine to me.

Shift-z displays the current framerate in the bottom right of the screen in small green numbers.
Geoffrey Swindale.
Truth is rarely pure, and never simple.
User avatar
jbilton
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 19267
Joined: Fri Oct 10, 2003 12:08 pm
Location: At home ..waiting to go to Work.
Contact:

Re: minimum FPS one should get in MSTS to make it "realistic"?

Post by jbilton »

Hi
Anything less than 12 will start to look too 'choppy'
Shift+Z shows frame rates.
Cheers
Jon
------------------------Supporting whats good in the British community------------------------
Image
User avatar
douglee
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 5230
Joined: Sun Jan 18, 2004 11:09 am
Location: Isle of Man

Re: minimum FPS one should get in MSTS to make it "realistic"?

Post by douglee »

Hi,
25 frames per second. Is the maximum the human eye can register. TV. is transmited at that and films are shown at that.
So apart from pauses to load items, eg. scenery or Ai traffic. gswindales 20-30 should do fine.
"If it is not broke do not try to fix it"
Rest in Peace Doug L, you will be missed by many, many members of the Forum.
Least We Forget.
Doug L
User avatar
tialho
Established Forum Member
Posts: 312
Joined: Tue Mar 04, 2003 10:45 pm
Location: Swindon

Re: minimum FPS one should get in MSTS to make it "realistic"?

Post by tialho »

Also depends a bit on how fast you are driving - at low speed (<25-30mph), I find lower frame rates are tolerable (anything over 10 fps), but for high speed running, need at least 20. As it happens, a lot of the more intensive sections of routes are in areas where you would prototypically run at low speed (for example approach to terminus or other major station), so this works out quite well!

Regards,

Tim
User avatar
lateagain
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 5730
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2003 7:05 pm
Location: Dorset

Re: minimum FPS one should get in MSTS to make it "realistic"?

Post by lateagain »

No quarrels with anything posted but..... change view and viewpoint as you drive along and watch how this affects the so called frame rate reading (bottom left hand corner of screen BTW when you press Shift + Z) and you'll see that it's rather an academic measure? Most reasonable set ups with BIN installed will run the sim fairly smoothly but high detail stock, passing AI and heavily populated tiles will take a toll and may cause stuttering whilst they load. Basically if it looks reasonable to you then it's OK isn't it? What I'm saying is don't get hung up on chasing numbers. They vary constantly as the sim runs.

Geoff
timenec
Been on the forums for a while
Posts: 290
Joined: Wed May 18, 2005 8:09 am

Re: minimum FPS one should get in MSTS to make it "realistic"?

Post by timenec »

douglee wrote:Hi,
25 frames per second. Is the maximum the human eye can register. TV. is transmited at that and films are shown at that.
So apart from pauses to load items, eg. scenery or Ai traffic. gswindales 20-30 should do fine.
Sorry to take issue,but they are different,one is 24 and the other 25,that is why the running time for films shown on TV is different to the cinema running time. 8)
User avatar
shebarose
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 1001
Joined: Fri Nov 24, 2006 2:00 pm
Location: Romford
Contact:

Re: minimum FPS one should get in MSTS to make it "realistic"?

Post by shebarose »

I find 5-9 fps to be ok :o although my PC runs all games as slow so im most probably used to it :(
User avatar
douglee
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 5230
Joined: Sun Jan 18, 2004 11:09 am
Location: Isle of Man

Re: minimum FPS one should get in MSTS to make it "realistic"?

Post by douglee »

Hi Tim,
timenec wrote: Sorry to take issue,but they are different,one is 24 and the other 25,that is why the running time for films shown on TV is different to the cinema running time. 8)
OOPs. :-? I defer to your point. :) It's always worth getting it right. 8)

Still, the number of frames that can be registered by the human eye is, no higher than, 25FPS. How's that? :D

Shebrose is happy with 5-9FPS.
1FPS is OK. If you want to make a cup of tea. :D :D :D
"If it is not broke do not try to fix it"
Rest in Peace Doug L, you will be missed by many, many members of the Forum.
Least We Forget.
Doug L
User avatar
rfletcher72
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 8643
Joined: Sat Apr 28, 2007 10:59 pm
Location: The Steel City
Contact:

Re: minimum FPS one should get in MSTS to make it "realistic"?

Post by rfletcher72 »

jbilton wrote:Hi
Anything less than 12 will start to look too 'choppy'
Shift+Z shows frame rates.
Cheers
Jon
12+ is OK for me,
Richard
Locked

Return to “[MSTS1] General MSTS Discussion”