MS Flightsim X under £10 on Amazon

ForburyLion · Post by **ForburyLion** » Sat May 26, 2007 4:03 pm

Worth a look if you don't already have it, I've just ordered a copy.

The Ultimate edition is in the sale also, but still about £40

bigvern · Post by **bigvern** » Sat May 26, 2007 6:17 pm

That's cheaper than FS9 is on sale for...

Certainly down to earth with a bump and must be a record for a price drop on an MS product, unless Amazon have done a special promotional deal. however it must be right as I think Just Flight are doing a deal with some scenery add-ons with FSX thrown in and it works out about a tenner for the core programme.

Guess it pretty much sums up FSX though - sold it to the hardcore fans for full whack, suddenly realise there's no uptake outside of that without bargain basementing the price.

Can I have a £30 rebate, please.

47522 · Post by **47522** » Sat May 26, 2007 7:08 pm

Meh.... i got my copy from play.com last week!!

enotayokel · Post by **enotayokel** » Sat May 26, 2007 8:21 pm

I think its problem is its a bit OTT on most PCs

I mean I have Dual Core Athlon 4200, 2GB RAM, 256MB GF7600 and still only get Frame Rates of 5-20 depending on what the game is having to do...

Things might be better when I upgrade my PC in a year or so's time - like FS2004

ForburyLion · Post by **ForburyLion** » Sat May 26, 2007 9:32 pm

I've tried the demo and it's playable but graphics are not that hot, I'm due a new PC anyway, just holding back until Kuju Rail Simulator comes out.

The annoying thing for me was trying to bump the order price up to qualify for free delivery without buying something I didn't actually want! Fortunatley you can now order gillette mach 3 blades on amazon so I figured I'd stock up on those as I will use them.

Post by **martinhodgson** » Sun May 27, 2007 6:00 pm

Apparently the Service Patch which has come out significantly increases frame rates - might be worth taking a look now.

johnmnstl · Post by **johnmnstl** » Mon May 28, 2007 8:10 am

martinhodgson wrote:Apparently the Service Patch which has come out significantly increases frame rates - might be worth taking a look now.

FSXBin

ForburyLion · Post by **ForburyLion** » Thu May 31, 2007 6:30 pm

Annoyingly, It's not easy trying to find the minimum spec PC required to play FSX at maximum settings, I'm buying a new PC and I won't be too happy if I find I'm underspecced when a relatively small increase in original spec would have produced better results.

Do these specs appear anywhere? - Closest I've found are on Wilkepedia:

System requirements 1.0 GHz CPU, 256 MB RAM (for Windows XP SP2) or 512 MB RAM (for Windows Vista),
14 GB hard drive space (15 GB for Deluxe Version), DVD drive, 32 MB DirectX 9.0c compatible video card

Hardware recommendation for good performance: > 3 GHz single core CPU (1.8 GhZ dual core), 2 GB RAM, fast video card with min. 256 MB RAM

Those recommended specs don't look that high end to me, am I missing something?

dkightley · Post by **dkightley** » Fri Jun 01, 2007 7:46 pm

Those requirements are way, way off!

They are the absolute minimum the software will run on. If you want performance, go for as much performance as you can afford....AND go Vista! With FSX SP1 comes full support for dual processors and DX10.

And a tip from me. Don't go for a NVidia card at the moment...go ATI.

bigvern · Post by **bigvern** » Fri Jun 01, 2007 8:15 pm

I thought DX10 support was still being worked on for FSX?

Speedbird083 · Post by **Speedbird083** » Fri Jun 01, 2007 9:10 pm

I've been looking at a new machine for a little while now but I've not bought one yet as I'm unsure which way to go with regards processor.
I could possibly stretch to a Core2 Duo Extreme or a Core2 Quad.

Been playing about on Cyberpowersystems' and a few other websites toying with a nice spec but spoilt for choice.

I'd be mightly p!$$ed off if I shelled out and couldn't run FSX with relatively high settings but its asking quite a lot in my monitors native res. (1920x1200).

I guess anything currently available would be an improvement on this heap (Pentium D930, 2GB 533Mhz & 256MB 7800GT). Test Drive Unlimited is unplayable on the lowest settings and S.T.A.L.K.E.R runs poorly too.

tads1970 · Post by **tads1970** » Sun Jun 03, 2007 8:43 am

Hi folks,

Yeah i'll buy fsx for a tenner,dont know how it will perform on my system thou,prob stutter like most peoples,hehe..im due an upgrade

@Speedbird083,

I notice a performance drop when running through my HDTV at the same resolution as yours (1920x1200),but only on certain games,so ive stopped playing games on it and just watch movies recorded in high defination at 1080p now,its only the file size that frustrates me 7-10 GIG a movie,although STAR WARS attack of the clones is 12 gig groan

High Def Movie trailers can be found here

http://www.drfoster.f2s.com/trailers_hd-dvd.shtml

Use WMV-HD (mediaplayer9) to watch or VLC media player for .mov HD

Daz

enotayokel · Post by **enotayokel** » Sun Jun 03, 2007 10:31 am

OMG - I have just installed SP1 - Massive improvement - most sliders are set high and resolution upped top 1280x1024 and I'm getting a near constant 20fps (with occasional drops to 18 or 19)!

(as opposed to ~15 with sliders on Medium and at 1024x768)