Virgin Voyagers, terrible.

Discussion relating to the operations of real railways together with the experiences of the people who work (or have worked) on them.

Moderator: Moderators

User avatar
01pictoa
Been on the forums for a while
Posts: 188
Joined: Thu Aug 17, 2006 7:38 pm
Location: Hythe, Southampton
Contact:

Virgin Voyagers, terrible.

Post by 01pictoa »

I went on 2 221's today as i was going to Brockenhurst from Southampton and back 'cos i felt like a bash on the Lymington branch (there was a Desiro instead of a slammer). Both Voyagers smelt like no joke. You could smell it throughout the coach i was in. This is the first time i've ever travelled on Voyagers, never again until whatever problem the've got is fixed.

Terrible.


Andy.
Samd22
Established Forum Member
Posts: 490
Joined: Fri Feb 24, 2006 6:30 pm

Post by Samd22 »

Sounds like an over flow in one of the toilets - my experiences on voyagers has been relatively positive. Nothing spectacular, but nothing that makes me think "I'm not travelling on one of these again".
User avatar
colinm74
Been on the forums for a while
Posts: 115
Joined: Sat Apr 23, 2005 10:37 am
Location: Sittingbourne, Kent

Post by colinm74 »

There is quite often a pungent smell in the vestibule area, however I've rarely smelt it within the seating areas :o

I read a while back (in the onboard magazine) that a Virgin employee had come up with an idea of using a particular scented air freshener in the Voyager toilets, perhaps this hasn't happened yet!!?
User avatar
jamesinbolton
Established Forum Member
Posts: 302
Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2005 6:14 pm
Location: South London

Re: Virgin Voyagers, terrible.

Post by jamesinbolton »

01pictoa wrote:I went on 2 221's today as i was going to Brockenhurst from Southampton and back 'cos i felt like a bash on the Lymington branch (there was a Desiro instead of a slammer). Both Voyagers smelt like no joke. You could smell it throughout the coach i was in. This is the first time i've ever travelled on Voyagers, never again until whatever problem the've got is fixed.

Terrible.


Andy.
I believe this to be related to the retention tank system on board these particular type of units.

I've noticed it more times than I care to remember, not pleasant is it! The pendolino "pee" smell isn't much better though... :roll:
"Enough with the persecution I'm saying"
JayVee
New to the Forums
Posts: 7
Joined: Thu Apr 19, 2007 12:54 pm

Post by JayVee »

I know this smell very well. It doesn't make me go "Ewww" or anything, I just call it Eau de Voyager. I'm probably just used to it though.
User avatar
45002
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 5801
Joined: Mon May 10, 2004 6:06 pm
Location: Hyperspace

I

Post by 45002 »

colinm74 wrote:There is quite often a pungent smell in the vestibule area, however I've rarely smelt it within the seating areas :o

I read a while back (in the onboard magazine) that a Virgin employee had come up with an idea of using a particular scented air freshener in the Voyager toilets, perhaps this hasn't happened yet!!?
There allways a bad smell in the mornings on Voyagers and Pendos i was told it the stuff they use to clean the loos with :o

Mite as well not clean then :wink:

MARTIN :D
Fed up with nitpickers and rivet counters...
User avatar
AlistairW
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 1465
Joined: Sat Dec 24, 2005 6:44 pm
Location: London North Eastern

Post by AlistairW »

Both trains stink. For a new train its terrible. Never had a problem on a MK3 or MK4, although of course they don't have retention tanks.
User avatar
enotayokel
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 2584
Joined: Wed Jan 18, 2006 7:04 pm

Post by enotayokel »

Never noticed it on a 159, though I read somewhere that current regs require the storage of the umm.... manure (was going to say something else) above underframe level, so the tank on new stock is in the ceiling, where as a 159's tank is slung under the bodyside near the coupling
User avatar
arabiandisco
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 3496
Joined: Mon May 10, 2004 9:49 am
Location: The Church of Noise
Contact:

Post by arabiandisco »

enotayokel wrote:Never noticed it on a 159, though I read somewhere that current regs require the storage of the umm.... manure (was going to say something else) above underframe level, so the tank on new stock is in the ceiling, where as a 159's tank is slung under the bodyside near the coupling
The new southern region stock doesn't have the same problem. The tanks on those are above "solebar" level, but not in the roof. I think they're below where the sink is, in that "console" thingy.

I think the pendo issue is that a vent from the effluent tank is near to an air intake for the a/c. Not a great bit of design, if true.
Having a brain bypass
Go 49ers
User avatar
bdy26
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 3854
Joined: Thu Oct 07, 2004 8:34 pm
Location: Manchester, rain.

Post by bdy26 »

I used to commute on voyagers every day, and whilst there used to be a slight smell, it was never that bad. Must have been a problem on that one i'd guess. Strangely, MML's meridians don't seem to have the problem, and also seem to be better fitted out. They are definitely quieter inside too.
User avatar
Thrashin
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 1012
Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2005 5:18 pm
Location: Hither and Yon - (Cumbria)

Post by Thrashin »

bdy26 wrote:I used to commute on voyagers every day, and whilst there used to be a slight smell, it was never that bad. Must have been a problem on that one i'd guess. Strangely, MML's meridians don't seem to have the problem, and also seem to be better fitted out. They are definitely quieter inside too.
There was an interesting feature on the Meridians in one of the Trainspotting programmes a while back. The impression I got from it was that they were similar to a Voyager, but with most of the problems ironed out. IIRC, there were very few features of the trains that were actually the same.

Cheers

Jack
User avatar
ajax103
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 2445
Joined: Fri Nov 24, 2006 5:41 pm
Location: Peterborough & Hertford North
Contact:

Post by ajax103 »

AlistairW wrote:Both trains stink. For a new train its terrible. Never had a problem on a MK3 or MK4, although of course they don't have retention tanks.
I have to question your post as I believe that Mk.3 coaching stock doesn't have CET as you pointed out but the Mk.4 coaching stock does.

BUT, I have to agree with you on them not having a problem.
User avatar
01pictoa
Been on the forums for a while
Posts: 188
Joined: Thu Aug 17, 2006 7:38 pm
Location: Hythe, Southampton
Contact:

Post by 01pictoa »

I think it's pretty bad to have a train in everyday service that smells unclean. There not new anymore, so you'd have thought the problems they'd have would be sorted. Desiro's and Electrostars don't have that problem and they're of a similar age. Haven't travelled on a Pendolino so can't complain about them. I went on a SWT 159 the same day, fantastic, lovely and comfortable (the seats are twice as thick as a Voyager) and clean!!

Andy.

(PS: can anyone tell me what 60 is still in Petroleum sectors?)
Bolt the Superdog!
HP Pavilion dv-5 1111ea, AMD Turion X2 Dual Core Mobile RM-72 @ 2.10GHz, ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3450, 4Gb RAM, 250Gb HDD, 15.4" BrightView HD. Runs RS, MSTS, BVE4 on full settings like a dream!
User avatar
shaun123
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 2275
Joined: Fri Feb 16, 2007 7:24 pm

Post by shaun123 »

60054, but I think this is stored
User avatar
01pictoa
Been on the forums for a while
Posts: 188
Joined: Thu Aug 17, 2006 7:38 pm
Location: Hythe, Southampton
Contact:

Post by 01pictoa »

Can't be stored, my mate saw it at Didcot today. (He didn't see the number)

Thanks,

Andy
Bolt the Superdog!
HP Pavilion dv-5 1111ea, AMD Turion X2 Dual Core Mobile RM-72 @ 2.10GHz, ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3450, 4Gb RAM, 250Gb HDD, 15.4" BrightView HD. Runs RS, MSTS, BVE4 on full settings like a dream!
Locked

Return to “Real Railway Discussion”