Bye Bye GNER
Moderator: Moderators
- AlistairW
- Very Active Forum Member
- Posts: 1465
- Joined: Sat Dec 24, 2005 6:44 pm
- Location: London North Eastern
Bye Bye GNER
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/6182027.stm
A great shame and a great loss to the industry if they do loose the franchise, but there was no way they were going to pay back that subsidy.
A great shame and a great loss to the industry if they do loose the franchise, but there was no way they were going to pay back that subsidy.
- jamesinbolton
- Established Forum Member
- Posts: 302
- Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2005 6:14 pm
- Location: South London
It's a ridiculous situation, GNER has always been the favourite choice for my regular travel to Scotland despite living over the other side of the Pennines.
I'm sure the aftermath of the terrorist activities last year hasn't helped passenger numbers, then again, paying back their subsidy and the prospect of competition from 2 open access operators on their core route probably hasn't helped either!
Looks like worstgroup will be after another mainline franchise!
I'm sure the aftermath of the terrorist activities last year hasn't helped passenger numbers, then again, paying back their subsidy and the prospect of competition from 2 open access operators on their core route probably hasn't helped either!
Looks like worstgroup will be after another mainline franchise!
- ianmacmillan
- Very Active Forum Member
- Posts: 9588
- Joined: Fri Feb 28, 2003 12:39 pm
- Location: N. Lanarkshire Scotland
The perfect opertunity for network rail to take train operating in house like they did with maintainance.
One they have proved that it will save the taxpayer money by not making a profit for the shareholders they can take the other franchises in house.
Then all they have to do is change the name to British Rail.
One they have proved that it will save the taxpayer money by not making a profit for the shareholders they can take the other franchises in house.
Then all they have to do is change the name to British Rail.
[album 80489 WWCo.jpg]
If it's got buffers it's Chain.
If it's got buffers it's Chain.
- danielw2599
- Very Active Forum Member
- Posts: 1601
- Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2002 12:00 am
- Location: I'm behind you!
- spartacus
- Very Active Forum Member
- Posts: 3461
- Joined: Sat May 04, 2002 12:00 am
- Location: Dewsbury
- Contact:
Nah, that's exactly right.danielw2599 wrote:Theres some legal clause somewhere that prevents NR operating a train company. To get TOCs in house Im sure there would be a huge legal battle.
This im sure is one reason why maintenance trains are contracted out to the likes of EWS/GBRf etc etc.
(prepares a whooping from Mr Vince)
"I am not a number, I am a free man!"
No to I.D. cards.
No to I.D. cards.
A sad day. Along with SWT the most highly regarded TOC in the country being ruined by the Treasury's myopic obsession with over taxing the rail industry. Everybody blames the TOCs for overbidding but nobody points the finger at the Treasury for being greedy and encouraging this.
Now Virgin will likely take over and run the service down and get a huge billion pound subsidy just because it's owned by Richard Branson and he's a saint don't you know that.
Now Virgin will likely take over and run the service down and get a huge billion pound subsidy just because it's owned by Richard Branson and he's a saint don't you know that.
- Hymek
- Very Active Forum Member
- Posts: 2270
- Joined: Thu Jan 24, 2002 12:00 am
- Location: 38A/85D
- Contact:
surely in theory virgin couldnt get the east coast route to scotland because they allready run the west coast and and would have a monopoly on london - scotland services right?
http://www.svr-dmu.org.uk - DMU Group WM
http://www.englishelectricpreservation.co.uk/ - English Electric Preservation
Producer of Rolling Stock for the UKTS community Since September 2002
http://www.englishelectricpreservation.co.uk/ - English Electric Preservation
Producer of Rolling Stock for the UKTS community Since September 2002
- arabiandisco
- Very Active Forum Member
- Posts: 3496
- Joined: Mon May 10, 2004 9:49 am
- Location: The Church of Noise
- Contact:
Expect GNER to bid again, just a bit more realistically this time...
Stagecoach came 2nd last time round, so I wouldn't be shocked if they won it. Their bid was about 50% of GNERs, apparently.
The London - Scotland monopoly thing is a red herring really, as the only place which both serve with any regularity is Glasgow (which has 9 Virgin trains and 6 GNERs on a weekday, with GNER taking about 40 minutes longer than Virgin, generally). And between them they have about 10% of the air-rail market between London & Scotland anyhow.
It serves both GNER and the DfT right for offering/accepting a ridiculous bid.
Stagecoach came 2nd last time round, so I wouldn't be shocked if they won it. Their bid was about 50% of GNERs, apparently.
The London - Scotland monopoly thing is a red herring really, as the only place which both serve with any regularity is Glasgow (which has 9 Virgin trains and 6 GNERs on a weekday, with GNER taking about 40 minutes longer than Virgin, generally). And between them they have about 10% of the air-rail market between London & Scotland anyhow.
It serves both GNER and the DfT right for offering/accepting a ridiculous bid.
Having a brain bypass
Go 49ers
Go 49ers
- AlistairW
- Very Active Forum Member
- Posts: 1465
- Joined: Sat Dec 24, 2005 6:44 pm
- Location: London North Eastern
I think GNER made the overly high bid at a time when franchises had a tendency to be granted to the cheapest bidder, or in the DfT's view, the one which will cost least or make most. Namely 'Worst Group'.
I'm aware some people here have a distaste for GNER but personally I like them, I hope the HST upgrade work continues. They have done a lot of work on their fleet, unlike some companies, and have always tried to improve things for the passenger.
I have 2 main fears - Sorry to say it again, but First Group getting the franchise, who will no doubt run in to make a quick buck, and be fast to cut any early morning/late evening services that fail to make money. Then run the franchise into the ground.
My other fear is Virgin Group getting in and proposing HST replacement with Voyagers, which is quite likely if they won it. We really need a TOC to be driving HST 2 forward before everything has under-floor engines that are heavy and make a huge amount of noise.
Its funny to read that Virgin W/C got £1.4bn earlier this week to help pay towards increased track access charges.
I’d personally put out a tender for a 20 year franchise agreement with a 5 yearly performance review and give it to the most promising bidder who will make the biggest improvement for passengers.
I'm aware some people here have a distaste for GNER but personally I like them, I hope the HST upgrade work continues. They have done a lot of work on their fleet, unlike some companies, and have always tried to improve things for the passenger.
I have 2 main fears - Sorry to say it again, but First Group getting the franchise, who will no doubt run in to make a quick buck, and be fast to cut any early morning/late evening services that fail to make money. Then run the franchise into the ground.
My other fear is Virgin Group getting in and proposing HST replacement with Voyagers, which is quite likely if they won it. We really need a TOC to be driving HST 2 forward before everything has under-floor engines that are heavy and make a huge amount of noise.
Its funny to read that Virgin W/C got £1.4bn earlier this week to help pay towards increased track access charges.
I’d personally put out a tender for a 20 year franchise agreement with a 5 yearly performance review and give it to the most promising bidder who will make the biggest improvement for passengers.
-
bthornhill
- Getting the hang of things now
- Posts: 41
- Joined: Wed May 17, 2006 3:10 pm
- arabiandisco
- Very Active Forum Member
- Posts: 3496
- Joined: Mon May 10, 2004 9:49 am
- Location: The Church of Noise
- Contact:
If you're the DfT, then yes. Look at the other franchises that have been let by them - none offer any noticable improvements (most actually offer cuts of one type or another: SWT Brighton - Basingstoke, FGW cutting just about everything in the west country...) and nice juicy premium payments.bthornhill wrote:If GNER do bid again, I hope the DfT looks at the fact that GNER have successfully operated the franchise for many years, and has many satisfied customers, It's not all about money, is it???
Service improvements won't get people into cars will they?
Having a brain bypass
Go 49ers
Go 49ers
-
charlierc
- Very Active Forum Member
- Posts: 9696
- Joined: Sat Feb 28, 2004 10:07 pm
- Location: The Matrix
I have predicted this for a while now.
Still, Virgin (Anglo-Scottish), FirstGroup (London-Doncaster,York-Newcastle) and NatEx (well, it's a bit obvious) would have monopolies if they won.
Reasons:
Virgin: VWC and VXC
FirstGroup: Hull Trains and TPE
NatEx: The coach services
The DfT and Treasury basically are milking the cash cow that is the railways for all it's worth which is why GNER are going out of business and, invitabely, FGW and SWT may suffer the same fate.
It is all a big joke the way our modern railways are run and the way the DfT have run it, we would've been better off with the SRA, probably.
Still, Virgin (Anglo-Scottish), FirstGroup (London-Doncaster,York-Newcastle) and NatEx (well, it's a bit obvious) would have monopolies if they won.
Reasons:
Virgin: VWC and VXC
FirstGroup: Hull Trains and TPE
NatEx: The coach services
The DfT and Treasury basically are milking the cash cow that is the railways for all it's worth which is why GNER are going out of business and, invitabely, FGW and SWT may suffer the same fate.
It is all a big joke the way our modern railways are run and the way the DfT have run it, we would've been better off with the SRA, probably.
