Stagecoach retains SWT

Discussion relating to the operations of real railways together with the experiences of the people who work (or have worked) on them.

Moderator: Moderators

User avatar
arabiandisco
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 3496
Joined: Mon May 10, 2004 9:49 am
Location: The Church of Noise
Contact:

Stagecoach retains SWT

Post by arabiandisco »

and it only cost them £1.2bn

http://www.stagecoachgroup.com/scg/medi ... 006-09-22/

No mention of new trains, but I can't see how they'll get 10 car windsor trains without them. No mention either of the future for 458s or 442s.
Having a brain bypass
Go 49ers
User avatar
trains2
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 1509
Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2004 8:22 pm
Location: Winchester
Contact:

Post by trains2 »

Excellent news, I'm very glad they won it again.

Rich
Image
User avatar
BR7MT
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 3226
Joined: Tue Nov 18, 2003 8:56 pm
Location: Kent

Post by BR7MT »

Excellent news :)

SWT have to one of the best TOCs around.

Regards,

Dan
If at first you don't succeed, destroy all evidence that you tried :)

My uploads
User avatar
arabiandisco
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 3496
Joined: Mon May 10, 2004 9:49 am
Location: The Church of Noise
Contact:

Post by arabiandisco »

Well as a cynic, I'm looking forward to seeing how they propose to meet the premium payments. But that would have been the case regardless of who won.

And if the lines out of Waterloo can't be profitable, there's really no hope for the rest of the network!
Having a brain bypass
Go 49ers
User avatar
AlistairW
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 1465
Joined: Sat Dec 24, 2005 6:44 pm
Location: London North Eastern

Post by AlistairW »

GOOD! Although would of been a interesting to see how the Japanese consortium would of handled the problems we face. But Stagecoach was my fav.

No doubt all the staff and passengers letting out a sigh of relief caused a gale this morning...
:wink:
User avatar
Christopher125
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 2629
Joined: Sun Jun 09, 2002 12:00 am
Location: Sandown, Isle of Wight (hooray!)

Post by Christopher125 »

A new franchise... As a cynical islander well there goes another excuse for putting off what to do about Island Line. Im sure they'll come up with some more.... theres only so many 20mph restrictions they can put in before the complaints get so vocal they *have* to do something.

You lucky people with those desiros. Tisnt fair :(

Chris 8)
Image
User avatar
enotayokel
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 2584
Joined: Wed Jan 18, 2006 7:04 pm

Post by enotayokel »

Maybe there will be a follow on order to the new tube stock?
User avatar
AlistairW
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 1465
Joined: Sat Dec 24, 2005 6:44 pm
Location: London North Eastern

Post by AlistairW »

Its not just the stock though its the whole network thats in dire need of work and the case for investment just isn't there. If there was the money it'd be nice to see it upgraded to say Wireless trams and extending the line over the route it used to follow.

But with such a low number of passengers such high investment would be better off put elsewhere. (Sorry Christopher).
User avatar
arabiandisco
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 3496
Joined: Mon May 10, 2004 9:49 am
Location: The Church of Noise
Contact:

Post by arabiandisco »

Stagecoach wrote:Island Line
Investment to ensure the continued viability of the existing Island Line rolling stock and infrastructure.
We will roll out many of the initiatives proposed for the mainland part of the business, including smart cards. However, we will also maintain the important local focus of the service, making the Island-based General Manager responsible for all Island Line matters.
We will work with DfT to place Island Line on a firm footing as a Community Rail Partnership.
Make of that what you will.
Having a brain bypass
Go 49ers
User avatar
Christopher125
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 2629
Joined: Sun Jun 09, 2002 12:00 am
Location: Sandown, Isle of Wight (hooray!)

Post by Christopher125 »

Hmmm 'continued viability' - err, the status quo (which Island Line said could not continue beyond the end of the original franchise, ie 2003) will go on it seems. Seeing as the ride is just more atrocious everytime i travel on it, honestly its worse than the busses, the money just keeping it working safely will be so large they may as well go the whole hog and do a complete renewal of the line. They wont of course, but thats as much the DfT and IWC's fault.

Arghh

Chris 8)
Image
User avatar
ccsdc
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 2804
Joined: Thu Apr 10, 2003 8:49 pm
Location: Poole in Sunny Dorset

Post by ccsdc »

That is excellent news. As my local TOC for the last 12 years I think that SWT have done OK. The early years were difficult running with a fleet that was 90% clapped out slammers, but they have turned the corner now and I for one look forward to taking train journeys now with SWT.

Well done SWT - heres to the next 10 years!!

Dave
Creator of the Thames-Mersey and Dorset Coast routes.
Image
User avatar
AlistairW
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 1465
Joined: Sat Dec 24, 2005 6:44 pm
Location: London North Eastern

Post by AlistairW »

Yes, and SWT introduced the first major timetable change in the region for something like 50 years!

Island Line - If anything it will become a guided bus way. :(
User avatar
salopiangrowler
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 7796
Joined: Mon Aug 12, 2002 8:56 pm
Location: Shrewsbury
Contact:

Post by salopiangrowler »

Island line will get buses i think.

It'd be too expensive to Completely renew the structure. I mean for instance the Permanant Way trains are non exsistant over there and track, Equipment, Machinery would have to use the ferry and road's to get to the site's.

Road Transportation is the only way forward with the island line.
Image
User avatar
Christopher125
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 2629
Joined: Sun Jun 09, 2002 12:00 am
Location: Sandown, Isle of Wight (hooray!)

Post by Christopher125 »

salopiangrowler wrote:Island line will get buses i think.

It'd be too expensive to Completely renew the structure. I mean for instance the Permanant Way trains are non exsistant over there and track, Equipment, Machinery would have to use the ferry and road's to get to the site's.

Road Transportation is the only way forward with the island line.
Not true, IoWSR ballast hoppers and their 03 have already been used on Island Line, and if neccesary the two lines could be linked up (most if not all pw equipment has gone from Ryde to Havenstreet when sold). Seeing as busses could not use the trackbed, far too narrow in places and would require a horrific amount of changes, and the main road is too busy they would have to just close the line = political suicide. It really is a stalemate, possibly till it gets shut down for safety.

Chris 8)
Image
User avatar
MrKeelar
New to the Forums
Posts: 8
Joined: Tue Sep 12, 2006 8:21 am

Re: Stagecoach retains SWT

Post by MrKeelar »

arabiandisco wrote:and it only cost them £1.2bn

http://www.stagecoachgroup.com/scg/medi ... 006-09-22/

No mention of new trains, but I can't see how they'll get 10 car windsor trains without them. No mention either of the future for 458s or 442s.
Piggies have been deep-cleaned and repainted, so they'll be around for a while yet.

All 28 remaining 458s are part of the franchise agreement. They're staying for good.
Locked

Return to “Real Railway Discussion”