TOC Names

Discussion relating to the operations of real railways together with the experiences of the people who work (or have worked) on them.

Moderator: Moderators

User avatar
AlistairW
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 1465
Joined: Sat Dec 24, 2005 6:44 pm
Location: London North Eastern

TOC Names

Post by AlistairW »

After the debate about FCC in another thread, I was wondering what everyone’s favourite names for TOCs are, it can be as far into the past as you like, present day and possible future ones.

Personally I quite like Great North Eastern Railway, or of course British Rail always proved quite popular :wink:
User avatar
danielw2599
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 1601
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2002 12:00 am
Location: I'm behind you!

Post by danielw2599 »

Either First Great Eastern or Network South East for me
User avatar
JSReeves86
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 1241
Joined: Wed Nov 23, 2005 8:29 pm
Location: Ashford International........

Post by JSReeves86 »

Personaly i liked SE&CR South Eastern & Chatham Raiway & the previous form LC&DR London Chatham & Dover Railway and the fact that Go Via has resurected it to some extent with the new TOC London & Southeastern Railway shame that in practice they are only refered to as southeastern but i must admit that it would be quite a mouthfull when it comes to platform anouncements....The train now at platform 2 is the 0745 london and southeastern service to london charing cross.

JR
User avatar
southcoasttrains
SCT Boss
Posts: 8192
Joined: Wed Mar 27, 2002 12:00 am
Location: Polegate, Sussex

Post by southcoasttrains »

JSReeves86 wrote:Personaly i liked SE&CR South Eastern & Chatham Raiway & the previous form LC&DR London Chatham & Dover Railway and the fact that Go Via has resurected it to some extent with the new TOC London & Southeastern Railway shame that in practice they are only refered to as southeastern but i must admit that it would be quite a mouthfull when it comes to platform anouncements....The train now at platform 2 is the 0745 london and southeastern service to london charing cross.

JR
Thats Go-vias aim :)

If we went for the South Western franchise it would probably be called London and South Western.
Edmund Copping - A UKTS forum veteran.
The light at the end of the tunnel has been turned off.
User avatar
eastern
Been on the forums for a while
Posts: 117
Joined: Tue Aug 30, 2005 2:37 pm
Location: Stratford, East London

Post by eastern »

First Great Eastern is best number one.
User avatar
Keelar001
Been on the forums for a while
Posts: 200
Joined: Tue Dec 16, 2003 7:48 pm
Location: Sunny London
Contact:

Post by Keelar001 »

Great Northeastern Railway Company...

Harks back to past glories....
"Kneel, and worship before the Great and Wonderful Edifice that is English Electric DC Traction Equipment. Never bettered."
metromuppet
Been on the forums for a while
Posts: 133
Joined: Fri Sep 16, 2005 11:15 am
Location: Sussex

Post by metromuppet »

For Modern names, i would have to say Chiltern Railways- It's underused and under thought about, so it makes a change.

Otherwise, i think Southern are a good company for names. It gets down to the point, and covers it all in one word.
Regards, Metromuppet.
A train driver.
User avatar
arabiandisco
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 3496
Joined: Mon May 10, 2004 9:49 am
Location: The Church of Noise
Contact:

Post by arabiandisco »

Anything that purports to be a "railway" is good with me. I don't like XZY Trains, nor First XYZ.
Having a brain bypass
Go 49ers
User avatar
Elojikal
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 1135
Joined: Mon Mar 17, 2003 5:56 pm

Post by Elojikal »

If I got the franchises for the southern region I'd have three distinct entities based around a common "network" theme. Thus Network SouthWest with a predominantly red based livery, Network SouthCentral with a blue based livery and Network SouthEast (which would be Kent) based on either grey (as per the existing scheme) or possibly green.

Although they would be distinct and represent their individual regions they would still all essentially tie into the same brand sharing the same service goals for the entire south coast region.
mattvince
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 1739
Joined: Sun Apr 27, 2003 8:48 pm

Post by mattvince »

Name is surely a mere part of the 'corporate image' of the whole company, so just judging by the name is possibly not enough. You can have the best name in the world, but using the worst possible font, in vile colours, just makes it look bad.

Good ones:
Southern - carried off with an appropriate logo and livery, very retro in a good way.
GNER - Again, retro, even more than Southern, but modern at the same time. Using Century Gothic makes it look classy.

Bad ones:
First *** - A corporate image which is possibly self-destructive. It confuses the punters and attempts to force the brand onto everything - but the brand is percieved as being bad.
Arriva - the same could be argued, but Arriva are performing better so there is less 'brand baggage'.
Northern Rail - the marketing boffins must have been on annual leave when that was thought up.

Others:
Virgin Trains - contradictory to First/Arriva above, Virgin Trains, whilst being a 'bad name' on it's own, has its own strength, because it is part of a wider brand which is well established. Unlike FG, where the brand has significant 'baggage', Virgin is merely another way of saying Branson.

Oldies:
Metropolitan Railway - what better to call your company when planning a railway through the-then world's greatest metropolis?
User avatar
Elojikal
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 1135
Joined: Mon Mar 17, 2003 5:56 pm

Post by Elojikal »

I've never been a big fan of "Southern Railway" or any name that includes the word "railway" really. It just seems very old fashioned and a bit passe and tries to hanker back to a bygone golden age that never actually existed. A matter of personal taste really.

In Southern's case it's also very presumptuous!
User avatar
jpantera
Well Established Forum Member
Posts: 704
Joined: Sun Mar 13, 2005 4:27 pm
Location: Somewhere in time

Post by jpantera »

Elojikal wrote: It just seems very old fashioned and a bit passe and tries to hanker back to a bygone golden age that never actually existed.

Thats a contradiction if I ever heard one 'an age that never existed' :lol:
Open Rails Supporter. Try it.
User avatar
skipperdipper
Well Established Forum Member
Posts: 644
Joined: Tue Jun 29, 2004 7:57 pm
Location: Wirral
Contact:

Post by skipperdipper »

Merseyrail, a name thats been around since the 30's or there about. The only exception is when Arriva renamed it Arriva Trains Merseyside and when MTL called it Merseyrail 'Electrics'. Livery's a bit dull, although we're promised our new trains will have silver, yellow and blue!

Rob
User avatar
jpantera
Well Established Forum Member
Posts: 704
Joined: Sun Mar 13, 2005 4:27 pm
Location: Somewhere in time

Post by jpantera »

skipperdipper wrote:Merseyrail, a name thats been around since the 30's or there about. The only exception is when Arriva renamed it Arriva Trains Merseyside and when MTL called it Merseyrail 'Electrics'. Livery's a bit dull, although we're promised our new trains will have silver, yellow and blue!

Rob
When are these new trains coming? They have just spent 51 million on the old ones so I cant see it being anytime soon.
Open Rails Supporter. Try it.
User avatar
Elojikal
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 1135
Joined: Mon Mar 17, 2003 5:56 pm

Post by Elojikal »

jpantera wrote:
Elojikal wrote: It just seems very old fashioned and a bit passe and tries to hanker back to a bygone golden age that never actually existed.

Thats a contradiction if I ever heard one 'an age that never existed' :lol:
By omitting the crucial word "golden" you are altering the context!
Locked

Return to “Real Railway Discussion”