First capital connect

Discussion relating to the operations of real railways together with the experiences of the people who work (or have worked) on them.

Moderator: Moderators

User avatar
viperskil
Been on the forums for a while
Posts: 105
Joined: Mon Mar 01, 2004 8:10 pm

First capital connect

Post by viperskil »

Other than being totally shocked at Firsts naming policy and huge waste of capital by rebranding all the stock and infrastructure I thought it would be good to come up with some names to truely describe First groups new venture: First . Connect, First Capital Disconnect and First ..
User avatar
danielw2599
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 1601
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2002 12:00 am
Location: I'm behind you!

Post by danielw2599 »

Personly I dont think theres anything wrong with FCC. Its catchy and to the point.

Daniel
User avatar
viperskil
Been on the forums for a while
Posts: 105
Joined: Mon Mar 01, 2004 8:10 pm

Post by viperskil »

It's a stupid name Thameslink has been around for years back into nationalisation even, this is worthless rebranding and probably t the tax payers expense.
User avatar
allypally
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 6519
Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2002 2:28 pm
Location: West Midlands

Post by allypally »

It's not being entirely rebranded - integral Thameslink branding is remaining, such as station names.
Alex
Honorary Citizen of the Independent Peanut Republic of Rushey Platt
frogface
Getting the hang of things now
Posts: 50
Joined: Fri May 27, 2005 10:41 am

Post by frogface »

allypally wrote:It's not being entirely rebranded - integral Thameslink branding is remaining, such as station names.
Thats good, "Kings Cross First Capital Connect" is a bit of a mouthful :wink:
User avatar
phat2003uk
SWTVR Assistant Manager
Posts: 7452
Joined: Thu Aug 08, 2002 5:52 pm

Post by phat2003uk »

danielw2599 wrote:Personly I dont think theres anything wrong with FCC. Its catchy and to the point.

Daniel
First Capital Connect catchy! Whatever next...
User avatar
danielw2599
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 1601
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2002 12:00 am
Location: I'm behind you!

Post by danielw2599 »

phat2003uk wrote:
danielw2599 wrote:Personly I dont think theres anything wrong with FCC. Its catchy and to the point.

Daniel
First Capital Connect catchy! Whatever next...
Well its more catchy than "One" or "Southern Railway" etc etc
User avatar
viperskil
Been on the forums for a while
Posts: 105
Joined: Mon Mar 01, 2004 8:10 pm

Post by viperskil »

To be honest One sounds pretty decent.
User avatar
arabiandisco
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 3496
Joined: Mon May 10, 2004 9:49 am
Location: The Church of Noise
Contact:

Post by arabiandisco »

And "Southern Railway" is the best franchise name out there. Shame it's such a lame excuse for a franchise, though! 'one' is a stupid name though - I'd have called it "Great Eastern" personally.

Last Capital Con is what I've heard it referred to as mostly.

I don't know what they could have done though, as the Thameslink brand doesn't really apply to the Great Northern services - not pre Thameslink 3000 anyway.
Having a brain bypass
Go 49ers
User avatar
n863dwt
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 1264
Joined: Mon Sep 30, 2002 11:49 am
Location: Near WCML , Carluke United Kingdom(UK)
Contact:

Post by n863dwt »

arabiandisco wrote:And "Southern Railway" is the best franchise name out there. Shame it's such a lame excuse for a franchise, though! 'one' is a stupid name though - I'd have called it "Great Eastern" personally.

Last Capital Con is what I've heard it referred to as mostly.

I don't know what they could have done though, as the Thameslink brand doesn't really apply to the Great Northern services - not pre Thameslink 3000 anyway.
i totaly agree
the route is still thameslink but the operator has to join up thinking in operation of the 2 segments there by giving one voice for the operation so to speak trather than 1 parent company , 2 mini operators, 2 route sections
“Tell my tale to those who ask. Tell it truly; the ill deeds along with the good, and let me be
judged accordingly. The rest... is silence.”

R.I.P Class 87 - The Electric Scots
User avatar
Elojikal
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 1135
Joined: Mon Mar 17, 2003 5:56 pm

Post by Elojikal »

Five Minutes Late Capital Connect?
mattvince
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 1739
Joined: Sun Apr 27, 2003 8:48 pm

Post by mattvince »

First WhatsInYourWallet?
User avatar
southcoasttrains
SCT Boss
Posts: 8192
Joined: Wed Mar 27, 2002 12:00 am
Location: Polegate, Sussex

Post by southcoasttrains »

Kings Cross, City and West Hampstead Thameslink will remain Thameslink stations, it'll cost too much money to rename them.
Edmund Copping - A UKTS forum veteran.
The light at the end of the tunnel has been turned off.
User avatar
arabiandisco
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 3496
Joined: Mon May 10, 2004 9:49 am
Location: The Church of Noise
Contact:

Post by arabiandisco »

What will St Pancras be called though? Probably just "St Pancras" I suppose.
Having a brain bypass
Go 49ers
User avatar
ForburyLion
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 1225
Joined: Fri Jun 14, 2002 7:30 pm
Location: Reading

Post by ForburyLion »

Good to hear that First Great Western Link and whatever the other one are will all be called First Great Western..... Would sound even better without the First bit at the front.
Locked

Return to “Real Railway Discussion”