Which Route?
Moderator: Moderators
- andrewtoplis
- Established Forum Member
- Posts: 321
- Joined: Mon Nov 28, 2005 5:06 pm
- Location: Somewhere Underneath London
Which Route?
Hi All,
I am looking for a narrow gauge route to download, will someone recomend me one? I like the look of the Baxter & Son Railway... Or the Piddlington route...both are on Uktrainsim.
Any Suggestions or things I should know? Will I have to download activities seperately (never done it before see)
Thanks Lads
Andy
I am looking for a narrow gauge route to download, will someone recomend me one? I like the look of the Baxter & Son Railway... Or the Piddlington route...both are on Uktrainsim.
Any Suggestions or things I should know? Will I have to download activities seperately (never done it before see)
Thanks Lads
Andy
- jbilton
- Very Active Forum Member
- Posts: 19267
- Joined: Fri Oct 10, 2003 12:08 pm
- Location: At home ..waiting to go to Work.
- Contact:
Hi Andy
Welcome to the forums.
Both those routes are very very nice.....but I don't remember them coming with many activities.
Try the Talyllyn
Also loads of related good stuff
http://www.uktrainsim.com/filelib-searc ... or=spontin
Then if you like it , you can also get the updated version off the UKTS CDs
http://www.uktrainsim.com/ordercd.php?
Only £6 including a donation to the railway.
Cheers
Jon
Welcome to the forums.
Both those routes are very very nice.....but I don't remember them coming with many activities.
Try the Talyllyn
|
|
|
Also loads of related good stuff
http://www.uktrainsim.com/filelib-searc ... or=spontin
Then if you like it , you can also get the updated version off the UKTS CDs
http://www.uktrainsim.com/ordercd.php?
Only £6 including a donation to the railway.
Cheers
Jon
------------------------Supporting whats good in the British community------------------------


- andrewgadd
- Well Established Forum Member
- Posts: 910
- Joined: Sat Aug 02, 2003 1:22 pm
- Location: CME Office, Bodgit & Scarper Engineering.
- Contact:
Hi Mate,
Try the Piddington, it's very quick to download (including patch) and easy to install.
Note: The Piddington is a truescale route, that means that it is built to the same scale that the default MSTS routes are built to. The Talyllyn (above) is a x2 scale route and uses x2 scale rolling stock!
All of my rolling stock is truescale (uploaded under the "Bodgit & Scarper" guise).
Please note that "XTracks" is also need for the Piddington, just download the latest version (get the self installer one) and run the package.
Andrew.
Try the Piddington, it's very quick to download (including patch) and easy to install.
Note: The Piddington is a truescale route, that means that it is built to the same scale that the default MSTS routes are built to. The Talyllyn (above) is a x2 scale route and uses x2 scale rolling stock!
All of my rolling stock is truescale (uploaded under the "Bodgit & Scarper" guise).
Please note that "XTracks" is also need for the Piddington, just download the latest version (get the self installer one) and run the package.
Andrew.
Andrew, CME.
Bodgit & Scarper Engineering
___________________________________
I’ve suffered for my art, now its your turn.
Bodgit & Scarper Engineering
___________________________________
I’ve suffered for my art, now its your turn.
- RobertM
- Very Active Forum Member
- Posts: 5907
- Joined: Thu Aug 12, 2004 5:28 pm
- Location: Centre of my own universe, where its scary
I would recommend the Welshpool-Llanfair, steep gradients, highly detailed+street running, what more do you want
Plus the patch's...
And stock...
And X-Tracks
RobertM
|
|
|
|
|
Plus the patch's...
|
|
And stock...
|
|
|
|
|
|
And X-Tracks
RobertM
Cheers, Robert 
Fireman at the Lakeside & Haverthwaite Steam Railway.
Second Valve simulation - https://www.facebook.com/secondvalve?ref=hl
Fireman at the Lakeside & Haverthwaite Steam Railway.
Second Valve simulation - https://www.facebook.com/secondvalve?ref=hl
- RobertM
- Very Active Forum Member
- Posts: 5907
- Joined: Thu Aug 12, 2004 5:28 pm
- Location: Centre of my own universe, where its scary
What part of it's inacurate???Earl1 wrote:Go for the piddington, I've found that the W&L route is so inaccurate it isn't worth using
RobertM
Cheers, Robert 
Fireman at the Lakeside & Haverthwaite Steam Railway.
Second Valve simulation - https://www.facebook.com/secondvalve?ref=hl
Fireman at the Lakeside & Haverthwaite Steam Railway.
Second Valve simulation - https://www.facebook.com/secondvalve?ref=hl
- pitleyfalley
- Builder of the Southwold Railway Route
- Posts: 2366
- Joined: Sat Dec 13, 2003 11:56 pm
- Location: Tinkering with a new project
- andrewtoplis
- Established Forum Member
- Posts: 321
- Joined: Mon Nov 28, 2005 5:06 pm
- Location: Somewhere Underneath London
- Frsimplex1993
- Building the West Lancashire Route
- Posts: 2321
- Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2003 9:46 am
- Location: Ffestiniog Railway
- Contact:
Terry's wren's and stock, the Bodgit stuff and the Baugley Petrol Tractor.
Cheers,
William a.k.a Silly Billy
http://www.freewebs.com/shrailway
http://www.freewebs.com/joflrailway
http://www.freewebs.com/railmachinesltd
William a.k.a Silly Billy
http://www.freewebs.com/shrailway
http://www.freewebs.com/joflrailway
http://www.freewebs.com/railmachinesltd
- davidaward
- Very Active Forum Member
- Posts: 3593
- Joined: Wed Oct 01, 2003 9:02 am
- Location: Liverpool
- Contact:
Sorry, but i also have to defend the welshpool and Llanfair. It is a great route to download and i would VERY strongly reccomend the download. Mainly because it uses non-default buildings etc, which make me wonder why the author hasn't made people pay for it!!W&L route is so inaccurate it isn't worth using
I have also compared the route to the route in books, and it is practically spot on! If you can point out a part which is not accurate, then i will be happy to hear it! I raise my hat to the author!
Regards
I trust that anyone who defends this route will listen to a voice from experience, as the major flaw i find is being confronted with New Drive a meer couple of hundred yards beyond Raven Square, instead of the 1/4 to 1/2 of a mile of a 1 in 30 climb.I have also compared the route to the route in books, and it is practically spot on! If you can point out a part which is not accurate, then i will be happy to hear it! I raise my hat to the author!
I also Know that the section between Llanfair and Heniarth suffers the flaws of lacking large amounts of photographic coverage, only places like Mill Curves, Tanllan, and Heniarth itself have been covered in detail.
While books are accurate they cannot replace a working knowledge of the route, mine comes from a life's connection with the line, and as a trainee fireman.
I wish no offence to the creator of the route, but do find it hard to believe that it can be classed as highly accurate.
- davidaward
- Very Active Forum Member
- Posts: 3593
- Joined: Wed Oct 01, 2003 9:02 am
- Location: Liverpool
- Contact:
It is all to do with the limitations of the simulator itself. No route is 100% accurate, I can find errors on SVR, because I know it very well, having fired along it many times. I say hats off to the author of Welshpool, it is a very challenging project to create a route from scratch only having old photos and a much changed route as reference.Earl1 wrote:I trust that anyone who defends this route will listen to a voice from experience, as the major flaw i find is being confronted with New Drive a meer couple of hundred yards beyond Raven Square, instead of the 1/4 to 1/2 of a mile of a 1 in 30 climb.I have also compared the route to the route in books, and it is practically spot on! If you can point out a part which is not accurate, then i will be happy to hear it! I raise my hat to the author!
I also Know that the section between Llanfair and Heniarth suffers the flaws of lacking large amounts of photographic coverage, only places like Mill Curves, Tanllan, and Heniarth itself have been covered in detail.
While books are accurate they cannot replace a working knowledge of the route, mine comes from a life's connection with the line, and as a trainee fireman.
I wish no offence to the creator of the route, but do find it hard to believe that it can be classed as highly accurate.

- saddletank
- Very Active Forum Member
- Posts: 14183
- Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2001 12:00 am
- Location: UK East Midlands
Earl1, it is a great tragedy of so many route building projects that authors struggle for months and sometimes years to produce a route only to be criticised when it's finished by people who know it well - the tragedy being that those people and the author never get in contact during the building process so that helpful information can be passed on.
You hear exactly the same thing at model railway shows - the public picking holes in an otherwise beautiful model because they know the area better.
I'm not criticising you, it's just a sad fact of life that these things happen - people aren't together at the right time.
However I am surprised at your comments as the route author took a long time to build the route. I believe he is a member of the WLLR preservation society and spent days and days on site and talking to other members (and IIRC had access to the society's records). The terrain was created from scanned old OS maps so I find it very hard to believe that there are errors of hundreds of yards in the placement of significant parts of the model. When you digitally recreate terrain in this way it's pretty much impossible to get spatial errors like that, as many route builders know.
If you could provide a screenshot of the area of the route that you say is at fault alongside a photo or map of the same location I'd be interested to see the comparison.
Martin
You hear exactly the same thing at model railway shows - the public picking holes in an otherwise beautiful model because they know the area better.
I'm not criticising you, it's just a sad fact of life that these things happen - people aren't together at the right time.
However I am surprised at your comments as the route author took a long time to build the route. I believe he is a member of the WLLR preservation society and spent days and days on site and talking to other members (and IIRC had access to the society's records). The terrain was created from scanned old OS maps so I find it very hard to believe that there are errors of hundreds of yards in the placement of significant parts of the model. When you digitally recreate terrain in this way it's pretty much impossible to get spatial errors like that, as many route builders know.
If you could provide a screenshot of the area of the route that you say is at fault alongside a photo or map of the same location I'd be interested to see the comparison.
Martin
