Which A4 Mallard
Moderator: Moderators
- ilovequo
- Been on the forums for a while
- Posts: 283
- Joined: Tue Nov 30, 2004 6:36 pm
- Location: Shipley between Bradford and Keighley
Which A4 Mallard
Hi
My fav steamy is the LNER A4 Mallard but have noticed that there is 3 versions on uktrainsim.
I downloaded all 3 zip files but when reading readme file it says that you can only have one copy of mallard as each folder will be called the same.
Is there a way round this so i could have the 3 different versions on msts.
(please say there is. lol)
Dave
My fav steamy is the LNER A4 Mallard but have noticed that there is 3 versions on uktrainsim.
I downloaded all 3 zip files but when reading readme file it says that you can only have one copy of mallard as each folder will be called the same.
Is there a way round this so i could have the 3 different versions on msts.
(please say there is. lol)
Dave
- thenudehamster
- Very Active Forum Member
- Posts: 5029
- Joined: Wed Sep 10, 2003 7:56 pm
- Location: Somewhere in cyberspace
- Contact:
It's quite possible to have more than one version of any loco - though my personal preference would be to keep the best looking and performing one and use that exclusively
You need to rename the loco Folder (at the very least; to be safe, the .eng file and the Wagon name inside that too) so that the sim knows which one is which.
When it comes to installing them, unzip to a temporary folder, do the rename, then move the newly christened folder into Trainset.
You need to rename the loco Folder (at the very least; to be safe, the .eng file and the Wagon name inside that too) so that the sim knows which one is which.
When it comes to installing them, unzip to a temporary folder, do the rename, then move the newly christened folder into Trainset.
BarryH - thenudehamster
(nothing to do with unclothed pet rodents -- it's just where I used to live)
-----------------
Any opinion expressed above is herein warranted to be worth exactly what you paid for it.
(nothing to do with unclothed pet rodents -- it's just where I used to live)
-----------------
Any opinion expressed above is herein warranted to be worth exactly what you paid for it.
I think Peter Harvey's use different file names but the same folder name so they should work ok 
Chairman of Sir Edward Farms Construction/Train Co. relaunched 16th March 2004. Beta testing group http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Loco_Works/
Was that in its PLC days or now its in the national collection?Ricardo wrote:Sorry its the Flying Scotsman for me, great MSTS models and real thing absolutely love it. (I own part of it)
Cheers Richard
I prefer Mallard myself
Chairman of Sir Edward Farms Construction/Train Co. relaunched 16th March 2004. Beta testing group http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Loco_Works/
- thenudehamster
- Very Active Forum Member
- Posts: 5029
- Joined: Wed Sep 10, 2003 7:56 pm
- Location: Somewhere in cyberspace
- Contact:
I think there's room for both in any collection. Both have their place in British and world railway history.
BarryH - thenudehamster
(nothing to do with unclothed pet rodents -- it's just where I used to live)
-----------------
Any opinion expressed above is herein warranted to be worth exactly what you paid for it.
(nothing to do with unclothed pet rodents -- it's just where I used to live)
-----------------
Any opinion expressed above is herein warranted to be worth exactly what you paid for it.
- arabiandisco
- Very Active Forum Member
- Posts: 3496
- Joined: Mon May 10, 2004 9:49 am
- Location: The Church of Noise
- Contact:
A4s significance is obvious, but what is so significant about Flying Scotsman? (or rather the A3 class - FS is significant because it's unique). is it that it's a rebuild of Gresley's A1 class? (the first pacific produced in large numbers)
From what I can tell, the A3 is just another top link express engine. That's not meant to slag it off, but just to say that it's no more/less significant to british railways history than a stanier pacific or a castle class.
I await the flames and hopefully someone will explain to me why it's so important!
From what I can tell, the A3 is just another top link express engine. That's not meant to slag it off, but just to say that it's no more/less significant to british railways history than a stanier pacific or a castle class.
I await the flames and hopefully someone will explain to me why it's so important!
Having a brain bypass
Go 49ers
Go 49ers
- Fodda
- Very Active Forum Member
- Posts: 6157
- Joined: Fri Feb 22, 2002 12:00 am
- Location: Bristol, England
As far as I know, Flying Scotsman was the first train to officially do the ton (100 mph+). I think that's why it's famous.
Of course, we all know that City Of Truro managed it a good while before, but the GWR board of directors in their wisdom decided not to admit it, being scared that passengers may be put off travelling on something so fast.
Of course, we all know that City Of Truro managed it a good while before, but the GWR board of directors in their wisdom decided not to admit it, being scared that passengers may be put off travelling on something so fast.
- buffy500
- Mr DMU
- Posts: 6794
- Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2001 12:00 am
- Location: Getting on all the right people's nerves !
- Contact:
Something that FGW carry on to this dayFodda wrote:As far as I know, Flying Scotsman was the first train to officially do the ton (100 mph+). I think that's why it's famous.
Of course, we all know that City Of Truro managed it a good while before, but the GWR board of directors in their wisdom decided not to admit it, being scared that passengers may be put off travelling on something so fast.
- thenudehamster
- Very Active Forum Member
- Posts: 5029
- Joined: Wed Sep 10, 2003 7:56 pm
- Location: Somewhere in cyberspace
- Contact:
As with so many things, later inspection throws doubt on the City of Truro record; it seems that a couple of the timings don't quite match expectations - there's a discontinuity.
There is also a 'claimed' record in the US of a NYC loco reaching 102.5 on a constant down grade in the Hudson Valley - as the timings show it to have been doing something like 96, 96, 102.5, 96, 96, it's probable that 'somebody erred'...
Flying Scotsmean's 100 is documented and accepted to be a 'real' ton.
I'm not judging beyond that.
Even so, it seems that modern inspection of Mallard's dynamometer car records casts some doubt on the 126mph, too, though it is, apparently, accepted that it did reach 125 - and no other steamer ever got that fast, anyway.
There is also a 'claimed' record in the US of a NYC loco reaching 102.5 on a constant down grade in the Hudson Valley - as the timings show it to have been doing something like 96, 96, 102.5, 96, 96, it's probable that 'somebody erred'...
Flying Scotsmean's 100 is documented and accepted to be a 'real' ton.
I'm not judging beyond that.
Even so, it seems that modern inspection of Mallard's dynamometer car records casts some doubt on the 126mph, too, though it is, apparently, accepted that it did reach 125 - and no other steamer ever got that fast, anyway.
BarryH - thenudehamster
(nothing to do with unclothed pet rodents -- it's just where I used to live)
-----------------
Any opinion expressed above is herein warranted to be worth exactly what you paid for it.
(nothing to do with unclothed pet rodents -- it's just where I used to live)
-----------------
Any opinion expressed above is herein warranted to be worth exactly what you paid for it.
Flying Scotsman is also special because it was used to launch the LNER's non-stop Kings-Cross-Waverly service. Two locomotives set off simulatneously (FS from KX and another whose name i forget from Edinburgh), but Flying Scotsman attracted the most attention from the London-based media, so it became famous. IMHO, I have to say the A3s were better than most contempory express locomotives. They were the best until the A4s came along, and better than many other companies' later designs. But in fact the A3s as a class aren't that famous - certainly not as celebrated as the A4s - it is only Flying Scotsman that is famous.
Angus
- thenudehamster
- Very Active Forum Member
- Posts: 5029
- Joined: Wed Sep 10, 2003 7:56 pm
- Location: Somewhere in cyberspace
- Contact:
The train (the 10am KX - Waverley) was known as the 'Flying Scotsman' for many years before it was officially named, and that was several years before the A1 loco was built to haul it - I believe the name originated in the days of the Stirling singles.
Maybe that's one reason the name has stuck so well.
Maybe that's one reason the name has stuck so well.
BarryH - thenudehamster
(nothing to do with unclothed pet rodents -- it's just where I used to live)
-----------------
Any opinion expressed above is herein warranted to be worth exactly what you paid for it.
(nothing to do with unclothed pet rodents -- it's just where I used to live)
-----------------
Any opinion expressed above is herein warranted to be worth exactly what you paid for it.