U.K. trainsim DMUs

General MSTS related discussion that doesn't really fit into any of the other specific forums.

Moderator: Moderators

User avatar
stevesherratt
Established Forum Member
Posts: 378
Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2001 12:00 am
Location: Brisbane Australia
Contact:

U.K. trainsim DMUs

Post by stevesherratt »

Hi

I would like to say a big thanks to all the people involved in the creation of all these fantastic DMU`s uploaded lately , i have been having a rest from MSTS and i never thought DMUs would be the thing to revive my interest !

They are all wonderful work and all capture the individual character of
each lovely old DMU .

Im having fantastic fun in the sim with all these DMU`s and a few of my old 1500 volt dc stock on Steve Nicklins Woodhead Route .

Just packing an authentic 1972 spotters lunch box with salmon paste sandwiches and going for a run out of Manchester Piccadilly to Guide Bridge .

Lovely Stuff !

Many thanks to all involved

cheers

steve in ozz :D
User avatar
vidal
Been on the forums for a while
Posts: 134
Joined: Mon Jul 05, 2004 9:59 am
Location: Tottington, Lancashire
Contact:

Post by vidal »

Hi Steve,

Don't forget the tartan flask, and the duffle bag to put everything in!

James
User avatar
buffy500
Mr DMU
Posts: 6794
Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2001 12:00 am
Location: Getting on all the right people's nerves !
Contact:

Post by buffy500 »

I am suprised that the original DMU's took to long to appear. I thought that they had a big following, and I think that they present the biggest hole in the classes modelled (until recently)
Image
User avatar
stevesherratt
Established Forum Member
Posts: 378
Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2001 12:00 am
Location: Brisbane Australia
Contact:

Post by stevesherratt »

:o Thanks James just grabbed them too and i almost forgot my scotch egg and my 2 wagon wheels !

steve in ozz :D
User avatar
johndibben
Bletchley Park:home of first programmable computer
Posts: 14007
Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2001 12:00 am
Location: Bletchley

Post by johndibben »

buffy500 wrote:I am suprised that the original DMU's took to long to appear. I thought that they had a big following, and I think that they present the biggest hole in the classes modelled (until recently)
This was probably due to an inbalance of people with the drawings and inclination and people with the inclination and no drawings :wink:

Sorted :)

I have a feeling that there's a lot more to come :wink: :D :D
User avatar
johndibben
Bletchley Park:home of first programmable computer
Posts: 14007
Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2001 12:00 am
Location: Bletchley

Post by johndibben »

May I say also that, now well into their stride, the models and reskins are looking excellent.

It was a huge gap but a huge subject as DMU's differ markedly and altering a model can take as much time as starting a new one :)
User avatar
ThamesClyde
Well Established Forum Member
Posts: 986
Joined: Sat Feb 08, 2003 1:50 pm
Location: Derby,Derbyshire,Centre of the London Midland Region
Contact:

Post by ThamesClyde »

Yeah with Mr Dibbens time spent scanning DMU drawings and Andy Dunnet and Mark Wiles answering many questions the DMU's I'm now uploading wouldnt be here. Thanks to the three of them for providing invaluable time and support, and the same goes to Alex Fairlie and Jimmy Gough for there texturing help.
Simon.
P.S I'm about to upload another GRCW 100 then after a breather of a week or two I'll be tackling the Park Royal 103 and the BRCW 110.
"Obviously not a member of the Clique"
User avatar
nelson
Well Established Forum Member
Posts: 904
Joined: Sun Jul 07, 2002 8:56 pm
Location: Tractor country, Suffolk
Contact:

Post by nelson »

Maybe the creators of old were unsure how popular the DMUs would be as the majority of train-simmers are into steam and look down their noses at "buses" on rails? That's the impression I always got, especially at my Model Railway Club where they poo-poo anything to do with diesel. I for one love DMUs, used to ride 101s a great deal in my youth. Well done to those building them now, they are excellent, still think they need some authentic DMU two tones to go with them though? :)
User avatar
ianmacmillan
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 9588
Joined: Fri Feb 28, 2003 12:39 pm
Location: N. Lanarkshire Scotland

Post by ianmacmillan »

Whether you like them or not the DMUs are an essential part of any BR route.

I am gratefull to Simon Barnes and Peter Harvey for providing these models and to Mark Wiles for the Cabview and for stuggling with the terrible physics Kuju gave us to make them go.

Add to that praise Jimmy Gough and all the other painters for all the liverys.

One other person who is probably unaware of these models is Brian Golding.
He published the book of drawings which made them all possible.

Thanks again guys.
User avatar
buffy500
Mr DMU
Posts: 6794
Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2001 12:00 am
Location: Getting on all the right people's nerves !
Contact:

Post by buffy500 »

nelson wrote:Maybe the creators of old were unsure how popular the DMUs would be as the majority of train-simmers are into steam and look down their noses at "buses" on rails? That's the impression I always got, especially at my Model Railway Club where they poo-poo anything to do with diesel. I for one love DMUs, used to ride 101s a great deal in my youth. Well done to those building them now, they are excellent, still think they need some authentic DMU two tones to go with them though? :)
Well I did my best, and given that I was really not intrested in this period I thought I'd done well, and it introduced Mark Wiles into painting, something which is now being put to good use.
Image
User avatar
thenudehamster
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 5029
Joined: Wed Sep 10, 2003 7:56 pm
Location: Somewhere in cyberspace
Contact:

Post by thenudehamster »

Surprisingly, simmers seem to be either 'steam men' or 'modern era men' - with apologies to our lady members.

The poor Gen1 railcars were largely the forgotten generation, until now.
BarryH - thenudehamster
(nothing to do with unclothed pet rodents -- it's just where I used to live)
-----------------
Any opinion expressed above is herein warranted to be worth exactly what you paid for it.
User avatar
nelson
Well Established Forum Member
Posts: 904
Joined: Sun Jul 07, 2002 8:56 pm
Location: Tractor country, Suffolk
Contact:

Post by nelson »

buffy500 wrote:[Well I did my best, and given that I was really not intrested in this period I thought I'd done well, and it introduced Mark Wiles into painting, something which is now being put to good use.
No offence meant Buffy, the older models are good, I still run Trackdancer's Special Edition set, Matt's and James Hunt's models.
User avatar
buffy500
Mr DMU
Posts: 6794
Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2001 12:00 am
Location: Getting on all the right people's nerves !
Contact:

Post by buffy500 »

nelson wrote:
buffy500 wrote:[Well I did my best, and given that I was really not intrested in this period I thought I'd done well, and it introduced Mark Wiles into painting, something which is now being put to good use.
No offence meant Buffy, the older models are good, I still run Trackdancer's Special Edition set, Matt's and James Hunt's models.
No offence taken.
The 117's were a long time ago, and look a bit tired now.
I think that they would be improved no end by 1024 textures and a rebuild of the interior.
Image
User avatar
nelson
Well Established Forum Member
Posts: 904
Joined: Sun Jul 07, 2002 8:56 pm
Location: Tractor country, Suffolk
Contact:

Post by nelson »

Hi Buffy, they still do look the part, I'm not a modeller, unless it's airfix, so I wouldn't know where to start, I always wanted to see more DMUs, the modern ones are fine but the old 101s etc had a bit more character, or is that just nostalgia?
Regards
Nelson
User avatar
ianmacmillan
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 9588
Joined: Fri Feb 28, 2003 12:39 pm
Location: N. Lanarkshire Scotland

Post by ianmacmillan »

We can't forget that buffy made the best and most popular "DMU" ever.

The 125.

(He also made the Virgin Vermin but I'll let him off with that. :D )
Locked

Return to “[MSTS1] General MSTS Discussion”