Not wishing to worry anyone, but before using RAM Optimizers, I would suggest the following article from last weeks Langa-List Windows weekly newsletter is pertinent:-
9) "Memory Optimizers" Redux
Fred, I know it is unusual to ask for your comments about another columnist's opinion, but Mark Russinovich says all Memory Optimizers are junk:
http://www.winnetmag.com/Windows/Articl ... g/2/2.html
Your last opinion I found
(
http://www.informationweek.com/story/sh ... D=17200583 ) said perhaps there are some small benefits.
Have you changed your opinion in the last 4 years? ---Alan M. Kaplan
In a word, no. <g> Back then, I referred to "memory optimizers" "RAM defraggers" and the like as mostly scams and near-scams; I still feel that way.
Then, I could envision a very limited, potential benefit in one highly-specific circumstance for the dominant OS of the day--- Win98--- but that was about it. And even there, there were drawbacks to offset even that highly limited *possible* benefit.
For newer OSes, like XP, all I can see are downsides from running memory optimizers.
Today, I don't use any such tools on my PCs (including my Win98 boxes), and can't imagine a reason to start doing so.
The above article has all the gory details if you want to know the hows and whys of memory optimizers, including the one highly-specific case where they *might* provide a *minor* benefit to Win98 users. But in general: Don't bother with memory optimizer tools, especially if you run XP or Win2K.