Strange question

General MSTS related discussion that doesn't really fit into any of the other specific forums.

Moderator: Moderators

User avatar
nightbeaver911
Established Forum Member
Posts: 397
Joined: Mon Aug 11, 2003 9:35 am
Location: Derbys

Strange question

Post by nightbeaver911 »

I was wondering if anyone knew roughly how many miles to a gallon a train gets. Doesnt matter if its a DMU or loco and only an approximate average. I dont want to go causing arguments.
SpeedLink - The Driving Force Behind the NEC

Alex__2008
User avatar
ca55ie
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 1589
Joined: Thu Nov 20, 2003 6:36 pm
Location: Location: Location: the worst TV show in the world :)
Contact:

Post by ca55ie »

i think it says something about how much fuel an engine uses at full pelt in a trains ENG file, but nothing about miles to the gallon, i will of course stand corrected :D
User avatar
Hymek
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 2270
Joined: Thu Jan 24, 2002 12:00 am
Location: 38A/85D
Contact:

Post by Hymek »

i wouldnt want to know, Lets just say that a 108 has 11 litre engines, so its probably rather low
http://www.svr-dmu.org.uk - DMU Group WM
http://www.englishelectricpreservation.co.uk/ - English Electric Preservation

Producer of Rolling Stock for the UKTS community Since September 2002
User avatar
johndibben
Bletchley Park:home of first programmable computer
Posts: 14007
Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2001 12:00 am
Location: Bletchley

Post by johndibben »

Reckon I heard once on TV that a 47 used one gallon per mile but I've no idea if it's true or under what conditions.
User avatar
1crick14a
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 1753
Joined: Tue Dec 04, 2001 12:00 am

Post by 1crick14a »

And that's correct John most of the Sulzers were around that figure....R
delticbob
Well Established Forum Member
Posts: 886
Joined: Thu Dec 13, 2001 12:00 am

Post by delticbob »

Everyones favourite, the Napier Deltic can clock up a gallon a mile for each of its two engines, when doing a 'Meatloaf' :-? "Going like a Bat out of Hell" :D
Bob
User avatar
thedarkness
Well Established Forum Member
Posts: 767
Joined: Tue Oct 14, 2003 11:13 pm
Location: Fleet managers office, Cosham Train care depot
Contact:

Post by thedarkness »

johndibben wrote:Reckon I heard once on TV that a 47 used one gallon per mile but I've no idea if it's true or under what conditions.
I heard its something like 1GPM in the summer, and 2 GPM in the winter, due to the fuel thickener added or something
{The thickener crops up in the Ladbrook Grove enquiry, they reckon that made the fire worse}
Best person to ask would be Dale Stewart - Basildd - He owns 2 locos and he used to be NSE power controller, so i expect he knows loco ranges, fuel capacities etc etc
For all the latest news on the preservation of South West trains BEP 412325, see;
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/2325/ and
http://www.epbpg.co.uk
User avatar
highterrace
Established Forum Member
Posts: 391
Joined: Thu Jun 05, 2003 8:55 pm
Contact:

Post by highterrace »

delticbob wrote:Everyones favourite, the Napier Deltic can clock up a gallon a mile for each of its two engines, when doing a 'Meatloaf' :-? "Going like a Bat out of Hell" :D
Bob
Would that also involve doing a Meatloaf and having an irregular heatbeat?
There is a forgotten, nay even forbidden word, which means more to me than any other.
That word is England
User avatar
ianmacmillan
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 9588
Joined: Fri Feb 28, 2003 12:39 pm
Location: N. Lanarkshire Scotland

Post by ianmacmillan »

I remember reading that a 158 used 7miles to the gallon; better than a bus.

I think the small print qualified this by saying that a train did not power all the time but freewheeled when going downhill or slowing.
User avatar
jimmyladd
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 3107
Joined: Wed Nov 12, 2003 8:26 pm
Contact:

fuel

Post by jimmyladd »

I read somewhere some time ago that a 153 will do over 20 mpg when crusing ie no stops. I know there . inside but that is good going! Also said article recond that a class60 with a 2000 tonne train did 4 mpg at a constant speed.Compare that to a 38tonne lorry which can manage about 15mpg tops!
JIM
Working to restore D8233, D5705 and D9531
User avatar
highterrace
Established Forum Member
Posts: 391
Joined: Thu Jun 05, 2003 8:55 pm
Contact:

Post by highterrace »

So that would still make railways more efficient than the roads?
There is a forgotten, nay even forbidden word, which means more to me than any other.
That word is England
User avatar
johndibben
Bletchley Park:home of first programmable computer
Posts: 14007
Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2001 12:00 am
Location: Bletchley

Post by johndibben »

My car does 50mpg .... mind you, that's oil :D
User avatar
buffy500
Mr DMU
Posts: 6794
Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2001 12:00 am
Location: Getting on all the right people's nerves !
Contact:

Re: fuel

Post by buffy500 »

jimmyladd wrote:I read somewhere some time ago that a 153 will do over 20 mpg when crusing ie no stops. I know there . inside but that is good going! Also said article recond that a class60 with a 2000 tonne train did 4 mpg at a constant speed.Compare that to a 38tonne lorry which can manage about 15mpg tops!
JIM
Trust me, a truck running at 38 tons will not be doing anything like 15 mpg.
Try an average of more like 6 or 7mpg.
(A 7.5 tonner might get in the teens.)

My car does 25 mpg, and that is Petrol !
Image
User avatar
ianm42
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 2749
Joined: Sat Oct 27, 2001 12:00 am
Location: Basingstoke, UK
Contact:

Post by ianm42 »

Its when you work out gallons per mile per passenger that the efficiency really shows. Divide by 4 for your car, and by 400 for a full train :D
User avatar
johndibben
Bletchley Park:home of first programmable computer
Posts: 14007
Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2001 12:00 am
Location: Bletchley

Post by johndibben »

And you don't get punctures :D
Locked

Return to “[MSTS1] General MSTS Discussion”