Here his latest www.youtube.com/watch?v=pmlAqIqylQI
MARTIN
Moderator: Moderators
You can't ask for more realism than that, can you?I definitely feel like I've driven an hour and twenty minutes
Here, BVE class 323 released in 2002, ancient but achievable in a game that is 20 years old but not achievable by DtG! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4TZo2emCJg4 It even has bogie run sounds.markpullinger wrote: ↑Sat Mar 20, 2021 3:28 pm I would agree with Steve on this one - never having driven or ridden on these units, I would just assume that what I was hearing was close to the original. It might not be, but with no reference to compare to, I wouldn't be overly bothered by it - until someone pointed it out - then I would!
Aren't we all biased one way or another. Alan's bias is no more different than yours are for DtG or against Alan, it is well-documented om these fora your dislike for his business model. Also, I am not against DtG per se, just against shoddiness wherever and by whomever it is displayed. If I bought a car and it didn't work properly I would quite rightly be aggrieved, why should that be any different to digital products?Yeah, you can't beat un-biased reviews....
Of course we are, and it could be claimed that it's obvious in this thread by the criticism from those who haven't bought the pack, nor seen/heard the stock in question first hand; but still they *know* (have been conditioned to think that way?) by an anti DTG bias.
Even though some aren't as bothered as others about the sounds there's no doubt that it is DTG's "weak point". However, a bundled stock item having "dodgy" sounds surely cannot mean that the whole package is only fit for the bin.
gptech wrote: ↑Sun Mar 21, 2021 2:19 pmOf course we are, and it could be claimed that it's obvious in this thread by the criticism from those who haven't bought the pack, nor seen/heard the stock in question first hand; but still they *know* (have been conditioned to think that way?) by an anti DTG bias.
It's interesting that you've linked to a patch for the OHLE, I didn't realise that that was tied in to the sounds used in the 323...could have seen a link to the passenger view I guess but not the wires....
..or are you now saying that the route itself is flawed and/or sub-standard?
Has anybody really looked at and evaluated the DLC for what it is, rather than what they perceive it should be?
On..before I forget--I'm not for DTG, but I am for the same criteria to be extended to all providers when reviewing.
Definitely, if you're aware of that of course. So, if you are and simply can't/won't use the bundled 323 but wish to run something prototypical you still have the freeware 323 to try, and (heaven forbid anybody should ever have to put themselves out a bit!) attempting to improve/change the sounds of the bundled 323 are still options.
The 323s have worked this line from introduction in November 2007 and to have a train which is not fit for purpose is stupid.gptech wrote: ↑Sun Mar 21, 2021 4:08 pm However, a bundled stock item having "dodgy" sounds surely cannot mean that the whole package is only fit for the bin.
If the route's good there's nothing to stop those who simply can't stand to hear the 323 turning their speakers down, or swapping the 323 for the freeware version, or even swapping it for something else completely. There's also nothing stopping them from attempting to improve the existing sounds, or investigate utilising other sounds that may be applicable. Too many want it all for nowt though.
Enjoy the route, treat the 323 (all of the bundled stock in fact) as more of a bonus item and go from there.
I have not said that, the OHLE patch is by someone else and I posted it for the use or not of others, the route is an ok one imo its an average DtG route nothing outstanding or special, I certainly think that more attention to detail for their London offerings is obvious by the lack of landmarks in this route compared to the smoke, imo there are freeware routes out there that are much better than this payware route. Alan intimated that there are members on his team of route builders that would like to get their hands on the route and improve it, look forward to that if it is the case. Would also be cool if Xavier backdated the route.or are you now saying that the route itself is flawed and/or sub-standard?