It's a matter of how many people are out there to present the creators with "gotchas" to their released payware. Clearly the 28xx creator finds themself in a less-than-ideal position; with an issue among customers that might have been sorted out or even avoided with a little Flickr-digging.gptech wrote: ↑Mon Oct 26, 2020 10:19 pmWho scrutinises the scrutineers?ronhessar40 wrote: ↑Mon Oct 26, 2020 9:43 pm Surely, if I was (theoretically) paying $30 or $40 for a locomotive pack I would expect things to have undergone scrutiny.
Age old argument, and if you look close enough you'll find a fault with EVERY asset available for this game.
I think AP is pretty close in terms of accuracy in general, but some things can still be nitpicked i.e. the wrong in-cab AWS equipment (electropneumatic valve and relay valves) and wrong AWS warning horn type/sound for vac braked locos (class 37, class 40 packs - vac braked should sound like a DMU's aws horn). Class 37 pack vol 2 has the hi and low horns flipped opposite in the cab horn lever control.
But really these are minor things that wouldn't hold me back from buying. Missing flanges? A misshapen boiler (not referring to this 28xx)? These are quite noticeable things and should be a red flag to the creator in theory. But in practice, if it ain't broke, why fix it? Is it worth the man-hours for something that won't hold a large number of people back?