Stainmore route?

General discussion about Train Simulator, your thoughts, questions, news and views!

Moderator: Moderators

User avatar
alanch
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 4907
Joined: Mon Feb 27, 2006 6:07 pm
Location: Leeds, England
Contact:

Re: Stainmore route?

Post by alanch »

locomotiveman1994 wrote:I guess that West Auckland and Darlington where two of the main sheds, considerd it was an NER route, wich makes the Q6 and the G5 (and the upcomming J21) perfect for the route.
I think the Q6 wouldn't have been seen over Stainmore - too high an axle load for the viaducts, from memory.
Alan

My railway photos are now on Google + - links to the albums are in this thread http://forums.uktrainsim.com/viewtopic. ... 9&t=149558

Lots of steam and early diesels from 1959 to 1963.
User avatar
locomotiveman1994
Established Forum Member
Posts: 403
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2016 10:00 am
Location: Bundesbahndirektion Saarbrücken, Germany

Re: Stainmore route?

Post by locomotiveman1994 »

Has been pointed out allready. But similar 0-8-0 did, do I guess the Q6 would at least be a good substitute.
Greetings from the continent,
Gaëtan

The Railway Operating Division - A Commemorative Train Simulator Project: http://sem34090.simplesite.com
User avatar
Trev123
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 4403
Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2010 9:13 pm
Location: Home Of The Americas Cup

Re: Stainmore route?

Post by Trev123 »

Intel i5-2500K 3.3GHz Quad Core, Asus P8Z 68-V LE MB, Asus GTX 1060 Strix 6GB Gaming graphics card, Windows 10 Home 64 bit, 16gb Corsair Vengeance DDR3 ram, Viewsonic VX2452mh LED 1080P HD Monitor. Seagate Barracuda 1 TB HD, Seagate Firecuda 2 TB HD,
User avatar
locomotiveman1994
Established Forum Member
Posts: 403
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2016 10:00 am
Location: Bundesbahndirektion Saarbrücken, Germany

Re: Stainmore route?

Post by locomotiveman1994 »

Looking good indeed! Getting excited here!
Greetings from the continent,
Gaëtan

The Railway Operating Division - A Commemorative Train Simulator Project: http://sem34090.simplesite.com
michaelhendle
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 8189
Joined: Thu May 27, 2004 4:15 pm
Location: Peterborough originally Hounslow &Durban

Re: Stainmore route?

Post by michaelhendle »

Hi
Just been checking for 0-8-0's and West Auckland had a allocation of Q6 from 1956-61,Also Darlington had Q6's as well,Tebey had a allocation some times of 7F 0-8-0.
Mike
Ex South African Railways Employee,My favorite loco is a SAR\SAS 25C Condensing Locomotive
marcusboon
Well Established Forum Member
Posts: 775
Joined: Sun Jun 16, 2002 1:58 pm
Location: The Netherlands

Re: Stainmore route?

Post by marcusboon »

locomotiveman1994 wrote:Has been pointed out allready. But similar 0-8-0 did, do I guess the Q6 would at least be a good substitute.
Yes, Q5's 0-8-0s ran over Stainmore, but only pre 1914... From 1929 until 1942 two Q5's were shedded at Kirkby Stephen, but restricted to the line to Tebay. Post 1914 the weight restrictions imposed on Belah viaduct prevented 0-8-0s from running between Barnard Castle and Kirkby Stephen. If you want to follow the prototype and run Q6s, then pick Weardale & Teesdale (although I admit nobody will prevent you from running doubleheaded 9F's over Belah viaduct).... :)

Marcus
michaelhendle
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 8189
Joined: Thu May 27, 2004 4:15 pm
Location: Peterborough originally Hounslow &Durban

Re: Stainmore route?

Post by michaelhendle »

As it's a simulation there is nothing to stop you using a class 150 DMU. or Pacer's, and classes 66/70 on freight trains,or back to sectorisation era classes 37 47 56, and class 111,101,105 DMU's

Mike
marcusboon
Well Established Forum Member
Posts: 775
Joined: Sun Jun 16, 2002 1:58 pm
Location: The Netherlands

Re: Stainmore route?

Post by marcusboon »

michaelhendle wrote:As it's a simulation there is nothing to stop you using a class 150 DMU. or Pacer's, and classes 66/70 on freight trains,or back to sectorisation era classes 37 47 56, and class 111,101,105 DMU's

Mike
You’re quite right, of course. But for me (and I suspect that goes for you too Mike) half the fun sim is finding out ‘what ran where and when’ during the years of steam, so that my trains fit the time the route has been set in…

Marcus
michaelhendle
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 8189
Joined: Thu May 27, 2004 4:15 pm
Location: Peterborough originally Hounslow &Durban

Re: Stainmore route?

Post by michaelhendle »

Hello Marcus
Yes I'm more interested in running the right trains and locomotives that would have run over certain routes,one thing I usually do is swap the MK1 and use Gordon's coaches in stead,At the start the Mk1's were used on crack express trains and named trains,

A route like Stainmore would have had Greseley/Thompson Coaches or Stanier Coaches on passenger trains,looking at the locomotives for the 1950's it seems the most likely locos would be BR Std/Ivatt 2MT,4MT and J21,J26,J39
Miike
User avatar
Carinthia
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 1123
Joined: Tue Mar 06, 2012 7:07 pm
Location: at the end of the regulator

Re: Stainmore route?

Post by Carinthia »

michaelhendle wrote:As it's a simulation there is nothing to stop you using a class 150 DMU. or Pacer's, and classes 66/70 on freight trains,or back to sectorisation era classes 37 47 56, and class 111,101,105 DMU's

Mike
I wonder why you put Class 101 DMUs in that imaginitive list? They worked the passenger services on the route latterly, although this was long before the days of their being called "Class 101".

John
michaelhendle
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 8189
Joined: Thu May 27, 2004 4:15 pm
Location: Peterborough originally Hounslow &Durban

Re: Stainmore route?

Post by michaelhendle »

Hi John

I put the class 101 in because they are included in the Wear Valley route by RS Derek

Mike
User avatar
Carinthia
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 1123
Joined: Tue Mar 06, 2012 7:07 pm
Location: at the end of the regulator

Re: Stainmore route?

Post by Carinthia »

michaelhendle wrote:Hi John

I put the class 101 in because they are included in the Wear Valley route by RS Derek

Mike
Sorry - not really a question but a comment . . . you said "I suppose you could use" when I would say you "should use" for the 101 against the other locos and DMUs you mentioned which are only pertinent to a dream world. (I don't object to dream worlds - each to their own even if it isn't my cup of tea).

I remember well seeing them at Penrith, so much more modern than the Derby Lightweights on the Keswick line (so it seemed, ha ha), and I always fancied a ride to Darlington but it was not to be.

Best regards,

John
michaelhendle
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 8189
Joined: Thu May 27, 2004 4:15 pm
Location: Peterborough originally Hounslow &Durban

Re: Stainmore route?

Post by michaelhendle »

Hi John
I've just gone mad and pre ordered the Victory Works Class J21,if you pre order it you get 10 % off,it also comes with scenarios for the Weardale Route,when Stainmore comes out there will a patch including scenario's for that route as well,

I was only going to use Green DMU's on the Stainmore,route and probably green 25's and 37's

Mike
User avatar
holzroller
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 4421
Joined: Sat Jun 13, 2009 11:00 am
Location: NE Scotland

Re: Stainmore route?

Post by holzroller »

Live quick drive testing now https://www.facebook.com/SteamSoundsSup ... 667665909/ probably will be viewable after as well
rkk01
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 1809
Joined: Tue Nov 04, 2003 8:42 am

Re: Stainmore route?

Post by rkk01 »

Lots posted on SSS FB page recently - must be close to release...

Looking forward to this, but with VW WD, AP BMG 50, Welsh Marches line and a few other bits, there may need to be some choices made.

Given all above ^^ I shall take a fairly open approach to what to run, including some heavy 8- or 10- coupled stock :-)

I also like to drive the 33 for route testing and learning, so I expect the route will see a “Dutch” Crompton with some seacows, and some suitably noisy EE traction.

Does anyone know what the axle loading limit was for the line / Belah viaduct?
Locked

Return to “[TS] General Discussion”