JT Marylebone to Aylesbury

General discussion about Train Simulator, your thoughts, questions, news and views!

Moderator: Moderators

daveannjon
Well Established Forum Member
Posts: 517
Joined: Sat Jan 26, 2002 12:00 am
Location: Oldham

Re: JT Marylebone to Aylesbury

Post by daveannjon »

Ah, so no mention of Baker Street on the detailed description - was that a possible future extension?

DaveW
GrateEastern
Been on the forums for a while
Posts: 170
Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 9:23 am

Re: JT Marylebone to Aylesbury

Post by GrateEastern »

daveannjon wrote:Ah, so no mention of Baker Street on the detailed description - was that a possible future extension?

DaveW
JT published a photo of the track layout at Aldgate a few weeks ago. I think it's fair to assume that they are working on a Metropolitan Line pack. Whether that will come with the S stock pack or as Separate DLC, I guess only JT know the answer to that.
Springer6
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 1382
Joined: Thu Nov 12, 2009 6:32 pm

Re: JT Marylebone to Aylesbury

Post by Springer6 »

Mr395008 wrote:
chris higgin wrote:I assume that's before reskins, probably jumped to the wrong conclusion there oops.
Chris H
Yeah, you’ll need Class 166 FGW (Steam) for the Chiltern reskins to work.
Yes it will most probably be the JT Chiltern Railways and the Chiltern Mainline 165 reskins that come with the main Chiltern route. I've just done one of the Chiltern Main Line scenarios featuring one of these skins. I had forgotten about all the problems and limitations of the Kuju/RSC 166 (I'm sure most people just use it for AI these days). It really would be great if someone could do an update for the Class 166. There is the UKTS 28101 physics update from "Inthernet", but that in itself is quite old now. AP did a sound pack at one time, but that seems to have been withdrawn.
There is at least one other 166 in the RSC Class444Pack01, but I haven't tested it and it may be no different to the Kuju/RSC default version ?

A better bet might have been the Chiltern repaints of the 170 as 168s or 172s (Thomson original or AP enhancement), but I don't think they run on the Aylesbury branch ?
User avatar
holzroller
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 4421
Joined: Sat Jun 13, 2009 11:00 am
Location: NE Scotland

Re: JT Marylebone to Aylesbury

Post by holzroller »

AP have just recorded the 165, so hopefully an enhancement pack will be forthcoming at some point in the future.
Springer6
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 1382
Joined: Thu Nov 12, 2009 6:32 pm

Re: JT Marylebone to Aylesbury

Post by Springer6 »

holzroller wrote:AP have just recorded the 165, so hopefully an enhancement pack will be forthcoming at some point in the future.

Potentially good news then ! :)
chrisreb
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 3134
Joined: Fri Oct 17, 2008 10:48 am
Location: Southampton UK

Re: JT Marylebone to Aylesbury

Post by chrisreb »

Be nice if any AP pack fixed the awful braking
Springer6
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 1382
Joined: Thu Nov 12, 2009 6:32 pm

Re: JT Marylebone to Aylesbury

Post by Springer6 »

chrisreb wrote:Be nice if any AP pack fixed the awful braking
UKTS 28101 more or less does that and improves the sluggish acceleration. It's the sounds that are awful !
User avatar
tubemad
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 2368
Joined: Wed Aug 07, 2002 4:06 pm
Location: Trowbridge, Wiltshire

Re: JT Marylebone to Aylesbury

Post by tubemad »

168's have been at Aylesbury depot, I seem to recall seeing on one of the 2012 diagram sheets a 168 or two working the Aylesbury - Marylebone via Little Kimble peak hour services
Drogba11CFC
Well Established Forum Member
Posts: 928
Joined: Fri May 09, 2008 9:48 am

Re: JT Marylebone to Aylesbury

Post by Drogba11CFC »

I saw one today on my way back from the Railex show.
Chelsea FC 2009/10 Premier League Champions and FA Cup winners
Currently reached: AP4
Springer6
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 1382
Joined: Thu Nov 12, 2009 6:32 pm

Re: JT Marylebone to Aylesbury

Post by Springer6 »

tubemad wrote:168's have been at Aylesbury depot, I seem to recall seeing on one of the 2012 diagram sheets a 168 or two working the Aylesbury - Marylebone via Little Kimble peak hour services

Was that a 168/0 ( the one that looks like a 166 ) or a 168/1/2 ( both of which have a 170 style cab front ) ?
User avatar
tubemad
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 2368
Joined: Wed Aug 07, 2002 4:06 pm
Location: Trowbridge, Wiltshire

Re: JT Marylebone to Aylesbury

Post by tubemad »

Springer6 wrote:
tubemad wrote:168's have been at Aylesbury depot, I seem to recall seeing on one of the 2012 diagram sheets a 168 or two working the Aylesbury - Marylebone via Little Kimble peak hour services

Was that a 168/0 ( the one that looks like a 166 ) or a 168/1/2 ( both of which have a 170 style cab front ) ?
Both, and would be at the sidings/depot too for stabling

Example photo's (not mine!)

Aylesbury Stabling siding

Image168216 by Roger Marks, on Flickr

ImageChiltern 168 003 @Aylesbury by Kris Davies, on Flickr

Aylesbury depot

ImageAncient & Modern(ish) by Roger Marks, on Flickr

Marylebone - Aylesbury via High Wycombe service

Image168216 by Roger Marks, on Flickr
User avatar
Trev123
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 4403
Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2010 9:13 pm
Location: Home Of The Americas Cup

Re: JT Marylebone to Aylesbury

Post by Trev123 »

Route uses 165/66. As already posted read this for stock used/required to run the scenarios. https://www.justtrains.net/product/london-aylesbury
Intel i5-2500K 3.3GHz Quad Core, Asus P8Z 68-V LE MB, Asus GTX 1060 Strix 6GB Gaming graphics card, Windows 10 Home 64 bit, 16gb Corsair Vengeance DDR3 ram, Viewsonic VX2452mh LED 1080P HD Monitor. Seagate Barracuda 1 TB HD, Seagate Firecuda 2 TB HD,
User avatar
twirlycactus
Established Forum Member
Posts: 406
Joined: Thu Mar 17, 2011 4:28 pm
Location: Leicestershire

Re: JT Marylebone to Aylesbury

Post by twirlycactus »

The 168s can't operate via Amersham, because they do not have a tripcock fitted for the LU section, unlike the 165s which do.
PC Specs: Intel i5 2.80GHz, 8GB RAM, NVidia GTX 1060 & 240 GB SSD
Anthony061
Established Forum Member
Posts: 319
Joined: Sun Dec 30, 2012 12:21 pm
Location: Cardiff

Re: JT Marylebone to Aylesbury

Post by Anthony061 »

Isn't it the class 172s and not the 168s which don't have tripcocks due to a different bogie design?

Regards,

Anthony
User avatar
tubemad
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 2368
Joined: Wed Aug 07, 2002 4:06 pm
Location: Trowbridge, Wiltshire

Re: JT Marylebone to Aylesbury

Post by tubemad »

Anthony061 wrote:Isn't it the class 172s and not the 168s which don't have tripcocks due to a different bogie design?

Regards,

Anthony
Unless they are on the back? I didn't think they had tripcock's but they can be lead by a 165 by the looks of it, as seen on this picture I found online:

Image168112 Amersham by Ryan Taylor, on Flickr
Locked

Return to “[TS] General Discussion”