JT Marylebone to Aylesbury
Moderator: Moderators
-
daveannjon
- Well Established Forum Member
- Posts: 517
- Joined: Sat Jan 26, 2002 12:00 am
- Location: Oldham
Re: JT Marylebone to Aylesbury
Ah, so no mention of Baker Street on the detailed description - was that a possible future extension?
DaveW
DaveW
-
GrateEastern
- Been on the forums for a while
- Posts: 170
- Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 9:23 am
Re: JT Marylebone to Aylesbury
JT published a photo of the track layout at Aldgate a few weeks ago. I think it's fair to assume that they are working on a Metropolitan Line pack. Whether that will come with the S stock pack or as Separate DLC, I guess only JT know the answer to that.daveannjon wrote:Ah, so no mention of Baker Street on the detailed description - was that a possible future extension?
DaveW
Re: JT Marylebone to Aylesbury
Yes it will most probably be the JT Chiltern Railways and the Chiltern Mainline 165 reskins that come with the main Chiltern route. I've just done one of the Chiltern Main Line scenarios featuring one of these skins. I had forgotten about all the problems and limitations of the Kuju/RSC 166 (I'm sure most people just use it for AI these days). It really would be great if someone could do an update for the Class 166. There is the UKTS 28101 physics update from "Inthernet", but that in itself is quite old now. AP did a sound pack at one time, but that seems to have been withdrawn.Mr395008 wrote:Yeah, you’ll need Class 166 FGW (Steam) for the Chiltern reskins to work.chris higgin wrote:I assume that's before reskins, probably jumped to the wrong conclusion there oops.
Chris H
There is at least one other 166 in the RSC Class444Pack01, but I haven't tested it and it may be no different to the Kuju/RSC default version ?
A better bet might have been the Chiltern repaints of the 170 as 168s or 172s (Thomson original or AP enhancement), but I don't think they run on the Aylesbury branch ?
- holzroller
- Very Active Forum Member
- Posts: 4421
- Joined: Sat Jun 13, 2009 11:00 am
- Location: NE Scotland
Re: JT Marylebone to Aylesbury
AP have just recorded the 165, so hopefully an enhancement pack will be forthcoming at some point in the future.
Re: JT Marylebone to Aylesbury
holzroller wrote:AP have just recorded the 165, so hopefully an enhancement pack will be forthcoming at some point in the future.
Potentially good news then !
-
chrisreb
- Very Active Forum Member
- Posts: 3134
- Joined: Fri Oct 17, 2008 10:48 am
- Location: Southampton UK
Re: JT Marylebone to Aylesbury
Be nice if any AP pack fixed the awful braking
Re: JT Marylebone to Aylesbury
UKTS 28101 more or less does that and improves the sluggish acceleration. It's the sounds that are awful !chrisreb wrote:Be nice if any AP pack fixed the awful braking
- tubemad
- Very Active Forum Member
- Posts: 2368
- Joined: Wed Aug 07, 2002 4:06 pm
- Location: Trowbridge, Wiltshire
Re: JT Marylebone to Aylesbury
168's have been at Aylesbury depot, I seem to recall seeing on one of the 2012 diagram sheets a 168 or two working the Aylesbury - Marylebone via Little Kimble peak hour services
-
Drogba11CFC
- Well Established Forum Member
- Posts: 928
- Joined: Fri May 09, 2008 9:48 am
Re: JT Marylebone to Aylesbury
I saw one today on my way back from the Railex show.
Chelsea FC 2009/10 Premier League Champions and FA Cup winners
Currently reached: AP4
Currently reached: AP4
Re: JT Marylebone to Aylesbury
tubemad wrote:168's have been at Aylesbury depot, I seem to recall seeing on one of the 2012 diagram sheets a 168 or two working the Aylesbury - Marylebone via Little Kimble peak hour services
Was that a 168/0 ( the one that looks like a 166 ) or a 168/1/2 ( both of which have a 170 style cab front ) ?
- tubemad
- Very Active Forum Member
- Posts: 2368
- Joined: Wed Aug 07, 2002 4:06 pm
- Location: Trowbridge, Wiltshire
Re: JT Marylebone to Aylesbury
Both, and would be at the sidings/depot too for stablingSpringer6 wrote:tubemad wrote:168's have been at Aylesbury depot, I seem to recall seeing on one of the 2012 diagram sheets a 168 or two working the Aylesbury - Marylebone via Little Kimble peak hour services
Was that a 168/0 ( the one that looks like a 166 ) or a 168/1/2 ( both of which have a 170 style cab front ) ?
Example photo's (not mine!)
Aylesbury Stabling siding
168216 by Roger Marks, on Flickr
Chiltern 168 003 @Aylesbury by Kris Davies, on FlickrAylesbury depot
Ancient & Modern(ish) by Roger Marks, on FlickrMarylebone - Aylesbury via High Wycombe service
168216 by Roger Marks, on Flickr- Trev123
- Very Active Forum Member
- Posts: 4403
- Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2010 9:13 pm
- Location: Home Of The Americas Cup
Re: JT Marylebone to Aylesbury
Route uses 165/66. As already posted read this for stock used/required to run the scenarios. https://www.justtrains.net/product/london-aylesbury
Intel i5-2500K 3.3GHz Quad Core, Asus P8Z 68-V LE MB, Asus GTX 1060 Strix 6GB Gaming graphics card, Windows 10 Home 64 bit, 16gb Corsair Vengeance DDR3 ram, Viewsonic VX2452mh LED 1080P HD Monitor. Seagate Barracuda 1 TB HD, Seagate Firecuda 2 TB HD,
- twirlycactus
- Established Forum Member
- Posts: 406
- Joined: Thu Mar 17, 2011 4:28 pm
- Location: Leicestershire
Re: JT Marylebone to Aylesbury
The 168s can't operate via Amersham, because they do not have a tripcock fitted for the LU section, unlike the 165s which do.
PC Specs: Intel i5 2.80GHz, 8GB RAM, NVidia GTX 1060 & 240 GB SSD
-
Anthony061
- Established Forum Member
- Posts: 319
- Joined: Sun Dec 30, 2012 12:21 pm
- Location: Cardiff
Re: JT Marylebone to Aylesbury
Isn't it the class 172s and not the 168s which don't have tripcocks due to a different bogie design?
Regards,
Anthony
Regards,
Anthony
- tubemad
- Very Active Forum Member
- Posts: 2368
- Joined: Wed Aug 07, 2002 4:06 pm
- Location: Trowbridge, Wiltshire
Re: JT Marylebone to Aylesbury
Unless they are on the back? I didn't think they had tripcock's but they can be lead by a 165 by the looks of it, as seen on this picture I found online:Anthony061 wrote:Isn't it the class 172s and not the 168s which don't have tripcocks due to a different bogie design?
Regards,
Anthony
168112 Amersham by Ryan Taylor, on Flickr