Armstrong Powerhouse Class 43 (MTU)/Mk3 Enhancement Pack

General discussion about Train Simulator, your thoughts, questions, news and views!

Moderator: Moderators

deltic009
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 4017
Joined: Fri Nov 27, 2009 1:06 am

Re: Armstrong Powerhouse Class 43 (MTU)/Mk3 Enhancement Pack

Post by deltic009 »

Those who are bemoaning the default HST may want to have a read of this thread, so as not to take it off-topic.

http://forums.uktrainsim.com/viewtopic. ... 1&t=146687
Matthew Wilson, development team at Vulcan Productions

http://www.vulcanproductions.co.uk
https://www.facebook.com/VulcanFoundry/
User avatar
thetrainfan
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 1919
Joined: Sat Mar 28, 2009 1:29 pm
Location: Lancashire
Contact:

Re: Armstrong Powerhouse Class 43 (MTU)/Mk3 Enhancement Pack

Post by thetrainfan »

New teaser video posted on Facebook:
https://www.facebook.com/armstrongpower ... permPage=1

"A sneak preview of the sounds and one of the many liveries featured in our forthcoming Class 43 (MTU)/Mk3 Enhancement Pack"

I like! :D
rosschris10
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 1785
Joined: Wed Oct 24, 2012 4:42 pm
Contact:

Re: Armstrong Powerhouse Class 43 (MTU)/Mk3 Enhancement Pack

Post by rosschris10 »

thetrainfan wrote:New teaser video posted on Facebook:
https://www.facebook.com/armstrongpower ... permPage=1

"A sneak preview of the sounds and one of the many liveries featured in our forthcoming Class 43 (MTU)/Mk3 Enhancement Pack"

I like! :D

all the other HST sound packs its hard to see what actually different. I am holding off buying this and waiting to see what Master Key simulations come up with on there brand new build HST that i am excited about
User avatar
smarty2
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 9976
Joined: Sun Aug 21, 2005 8:16 am
Location: 1963, at Snow Hill!
Contact:

Re: Armstrong Powerhouse Class 43 (MTU)/Mk3 Enhancement Pack

Post by smarty2 »

Nice.
Best Regards
Martin (smarty2)
Non technically minded individual!

Is There A God?
Dudley Bible web page
User avatar
thetrainfan
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 1919
Joined: Sat Mar 28, 2009 1:29 pm
Location: Lancashire
Contact:

Re: Armstrong Powerhouse Class 43 (MTU)/Mk3 Enhancement Pack

Post by thetrainfan »

rosschris10 wrote:
thetrainfan wrote:New teaser video posted on Facebook:
https://www.facebook.com/armstrongpower ... permPage=1

"A sneak preview of the sounds and one of the many liveries featured in our forthcoming Class 43 (MTU)/Mk3 Enhancement Pack"

I like! :D

all the other HST sound packs its hard to see what actually different. I am holding off buying this and waiting to see what Master Key simulations come up with on there brand new build HST that i am excited about
I'd hope they all sound like HSTs. Hence why this is being sold as an enhancement pack. But of course you wouldn't be interested in the slightest at all.
User avatar

Easilyconfused
Worried about Silent Chickens
Posts: 13205
Joined: Tue Dec 31, 2002 9:06 am
Location: Portsmouth & Bristol
Contact:

Re: Armstrong Powerhouse Class 43 (MTU)/Mk3 Enhancement Pack

Post by Easilyconfused »

A bunch of posts just got dumped. Please keep it polite and on-topic or the whole thread goes in the bin next time.
Kindest regards

John Lewis

Member of the forum moderation team
User avatar
thetrainfan
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 1919
Joined: Sat Mar 28, 2009 1:29 pm
Location: Lancashire
Contact:

Re: Armstrong Powerhouse Class 43 (MTU)/Mk3 Enhancement Pack

Post by thetrainfan »

One main feature of our forthcoming Class 43 (MTU)/Mk3 Enhancement Pack is ATP (Automatic Train Protection).
Following a number of incidents, this safety system was introduced on the Great Western Main Line (GWML) between London Paddington & Bristol. It monitors signals/speed limits and should the driver not respond correctly to them, intervenes with a brake application. Note that due to limitations of the simulator, we have not been able to simulate the signal monitoring part of the system.
Check out what we have managed to implement though, in the video below!

https://www.facebook.com/armstrongpower ... 298121504/
User avatar
smarty2
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 9976
Joined: Sun Aug 21, 2005 8:16 am
Location: 1963, at Snow Hill!
Contact:

Re: Armstrong Powerhouse Class 43 (MTU)/Mk3 Enhancement Pack

Post by smarty2 »

Cool. Looking forward to the release.
Best Regards
Martin (smarty2)
Non technically minded individual!

Is There A God?
Dudley Bible web page
david1
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 1246
Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2003 2:55 pm

Re: Armstrong Powerhouse Class 43 (MTU)/Mk3 Enhancement Pack

Post by david1 »

rosschris10 wrote:sorry excuse me for having a opinion i forgot your not allowed one regarding this developer unless your praising everything they release
deltic009 wrote:It's not an opinion, and you're well noted for tired cliche style bashing of AP. Of course people are excited for this improvement over the default item plus reskins, objects and scripts to make it all come together as a step on from the default.People tolerate the default stuff until something better comes along.
Just because people buy something does not mean they like or are happy with it, it could be that the item is need to make scenarios realistic, I have the class 45 for example but don't like the sounds so just use as AI because it is need for scenarios, if a better sounds comes along then I will start driving it, the same was with the class 91, did not drive until it was enhanced.
rosschris10
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 1785
Joined: Wed Oct 24, 2012 4:42 pm
Contact:

Re: Armstrong Powerhouse Class 43 (MTU)/Mk3 Enhancement Pack

Post by rosschris10 »

thetrainfan wrote:One main feature of our forthcoming Class 43 (MTU)/Mk3 Enhancement Pack is ATP (Automatic Train Protection).
Following a number of incidents, this safety system was introduced on the Great Western Main Line (GWML) between London Paddington & Bristol. It monitors signals/speed limits and should the driver not respond correctly to them, intervenes with a brake application. Note that due to limitations of the simulator, we have not been able to simulate the signal monitoring part of the system.
Check out what we have managed to implement though, in the video below!

https://www.facebook.com/armstrongpower ... 298121504/
So the main point for the system is to protect the train from passing a signal??? So they are implementing the system into the "enhancement pack" but can't get it working correctly with the signals. So really it isn't not implemented then or am I missing something
User avatar
yerkes
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 2545
Joined: Thu Oct 09, 2003 6:18 am
Location: Kidlington, Oxfordshire

Re: Armstrong Powerhouse Class 43 (MTU)/Mk3 Enhancement Pack

Post by yerkes »

Looks as though it will monitor speed limits. Pretty cool.

Sent from my Moto G (4) using Tapatalk
Michael
User avatar
ashgray
Wafflus Maximus
Posts: 12235
Joined: Sun Jan 09, 2005 3:25 pm
Location: GWR, Nailsea, Somerset

Re: Armstrong Powerhouse Class 43 (MTU)/Mk3 Enhancement Pack

Post by ashgray »

rosschris10 wrote:So the main point for the system is to protect the train from passing a signal??? So they are implementing the system into the "enhancement pack" but can't get it working correctly with the signals. So really it isn't not implemented then or am I missing something
Well, if it "isn't not implemented", as you say, then it must be implemented! :wink:

Seriously though, a literal reading of thetrainfan's post is that they've implemented ATP in respect of speed limits - one of the two main points of the system.

Ash
Ashley Gray

Intel Core i7-7700K @ 4.2Ghz Quad Core, Gigabyte Gaming Motherboard, 2 x 512Gb SSDs + 1TB SATA drives,
16 Gb DDR-4 Corsair RAM, Nvidia GeForce GTX1060 6Gb RAM, ASUS Xonar D2X/XDT Soundcard, Windows 10 64 bit
rosschris10
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 1785
Joined: Wed Oct 24, 2012 4:42 pm
Contact:

Re: Armstrong Powerhouse Class 43 (MTU)/Mk3 Enhancement Pack

Post by rosschris10 »

ashgray wrote:
rosschris10 wrote:So the main point for the system is to protect the train from passing a signal??? So they are implementing the system into the "enhancement pack" but can't get it working correctly with the signals. So really it isn't not implemented then or am I missing something
Well, if it "isn't not implemented", as you say, then it must be implemented! :wink:

Seriously though, a literal reading of thetrainfan's post is that they've implemented ATP in respect of speed limits - one of the two main points of the system.

Ash

Ok but the MAIN safety reason of preventing the train passing a signal at danger is not implemented
bri2808
Well Established Forum Member
Posts: 735
Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2007 9:46 am
Location: Dartford,Kent

Re: Armstrong Powerhouse Class 43 (MTU)/Mk3 Enhancement Pack

Post by bri2808 »

I think another good thing is that it will work on all routes and wont need any tinkering with
deltic009
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 4017
Joined: Fri Nov 27, 2009 1:06 am

Re: Armstrong Powerhouse Class 43 (MTU)/Mk3 Enhancement Pack

Post by deltic009 »

rosschris10 wrote:
thetrainfan wrote:One main feature of our forthcoming Class 43 (MTU)/Mk3 Enhancement Pack is ATP (Automatic Train Protection).
Following a number of incidents, this safety system was introduced on the Great Western Main Line (GWML) between London Paddington & Bristol. It monitors signals/speed limits and should the driver not respond correctly to them, intervenes with a brake application. Note that due to limitations of the simulator, we have not been able to simulate the signal monitoring part of the system.
Check out what we have managed to implement though, in the video below!

https://www.facebook.com/armstrongpower ... 298121504/
So the main point for the system is to protect the train from passing a signal??? So they are implementing the system into the "enhancement pack" but can't get it working correctly with the signals. So really it isn't not implemented then or am I missing something
The full explanation from AP not enough to stop you poking your neck out to whine about another of their products then?

It would require custom signal scripts which report back to the APT system, and then routes would require those signals installing in place of the standard ones - every single signal - in order to replicate the behaviour correctly. And all of this would put an additional load on the SIM and the users machine, an additional load that would be entirely irrelevant when not driving the route in an AP enhanced MTU HST - doesn't really sound like a worthwhile trade-off in either the performance hit, nor the massive amount of effort required in the first place.
Matthew Wilson, development team at Vulcan Productions

http://www.vulcanproductions.co.uk
https://www.facebook.com/VulcanFoundry/
Locked

Return to “[TS] General Discussion”