1950's Riviera disappointment

General discussion about Train Simulator, your thoughts, questions, news and views!

Moderator: Moderators

User avatar
holzroller
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 4421
Joined: Sat Jun 13, 2009 11:00 am
Location: NE Scotland

Re: 1950's Riviera disappointment

Post by holzroller »

Quite correct, all loco hauled/pushed coach formations should have at least one brake van in their formation.
gptech
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 19585
Joined: Fri Oct 10, 2008 5:48 pm
Location: Wakefield, West Yorkshire

Re: 1950's Riviera disappointment

Post by gptech »

atlasduff47 wrote:based on The Clash song Know Your Rights...........................
or, perhaps more aptly, "Train in vain"? :wink:
User avatar
atlasduff47
Well Established Forum Member
Posts: 711
Joined: Sun Nov 11, 2012 2:04 pm
Location: Firmly in the BR Blue Era

Re: 1950's Riviera disappointment

Post by atlasduff47 »

gptech wrote:
atlasduff47 wrote:based on The Clash song Know Your Rights...........................
or, perhaps more aptly, "Train in vain"? :wink:
Nice reference! :)

"But you don't understand my point of view
I suppose there's nothing I can do"

:wink:
Andy
User avatar
atlasduff47
Well Established Forum Member
Posts: 711
Joined: Sun Nov 11, 2012 2:04 pm
Location: Firmly in the BR Blue Era

Re: 1950's Riviera disappointment

Post by atlasduff47 »

Which has given me an idea......................

http://forums.uktrainsim.com/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=143063
Andy
sean53
Established Forum Member
Posts: 408
Joined: Fri Dec 14, 2007 4:36 pm

Re: 1950's Riviera disappointment

Post by sean53 »

johny wrote:I can see the reason for folk's objections to 5ft signals, now. Reading the manual it is quite clear that 5ft arms have been used throughout the TS route on mainline track, John
DTG may have used the larger arms to make them easier to see. Always a problem with semaphores since we lost the "next ahead signal indicator" in the HUD
rkk01
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 1809
Joined: Tue Nov 04, 2003 8:42 am

Re: 1950's Riviera disappointment

Post by rkk01 »

To be fair, I've not yet driven the route, so should reserve judgement...

However, I previously put a fair bit of research into Exeter St David's, to get the BR blue / semaphore signalled layout of my youth, so I know it can be done ;-) although with some minor compromises...

My main source of disappointment - I've extended modern Riviera to Meldon, and want to do the same for retro Riviera... so St David's bank and the correct layout is important ( for me)
rkk01
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 1809
Joined: Tue Nov 04, 2003 8:42 am

Re: 1950's Riviera disappointment

Post by rkk01 »

Are the "iconic" Exeter Middle and West boxes correctly represented...? Remember being an annoyed teenager when Middle box was pulled down :-(
trainfan11111
Been on the forums for a while
Posts: 265
Joined: Sun Nov 08, 2009 1:40 am
Location: home

Re: 1950's Riviera disappointment

Post by trainfan11111 »

michaelhendle wrote: I'm also wondering if the DTG 57XX has push\pull apparatus fitted to it?

Mike
The 57xx class were never autofitted in GWR or BR days though one was fitted with it for a while in preservation IIRC
User avatar
longbow
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 3608
Joined: Mon Mar 18, 2002 12:00 am
Location: Noosa, Australia
Contact:

Re: 1950's Riviera disappointment

Post by longbow »

Are the "iconic" Exeter Middle and West boxes correctly represented...? Remember being an annoyed teenager when Middle box was pulled down
The West box is a generic model that looks fairly authentic. But there's no Middle box at all. Now that I've noticed it's missing I shall install the custom model from the Glorious Devon route.
tagsdm
Established Forum Member
Posts: 326
Joined: Fri Jul 26, 2002 6:52 pm

Re: 1950's Riviera disappointment

Post by tagsdm »

Has anyone else found that there is no coal load in the Collett tender for the Hall? I suppose we can use the Hawksworth. I found this with the DT 4F Fowler tender as well, though not completely empty. Must be starting a trend.

tagsdm
User avatar
longbow
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 3608
Joined: Mon Mar 18, 2002 12:00 am
Location: Noosa, Australia
Contact:

Re: 1950's Riviera disappointment

Post by longbow »

Could somebody confirm please that there is no platform marker for the Exeter Down Main Platform? If so I'll email DTG but it's possible I deleted it by mistake.
User avatar
Thugsy
Established Forum Member
Posts: 349
Joined: Tue Jan 23, 2007 11:57 am
Location: Kingston

Re: 1950's Riviera disappointment

Post by Thugsy »

longbow wrote:Could somebody confirm please that there is no platform marker for the Exeter Down Main Platform? If so I'll email DTG but it's possible I deleted it by mistake.
On mine it is there but it is called Exeter Down Loop Platform. So not really the right name but it does work.
User avatar
longbow
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 3608
Joined: Mon Mar 18, 2002 12:00 am
Location: Noosa, Australia
Contact:

Re: 1950's Riviera disappointment

Post by longbow »

That marker I have - but can you see a down platform without one?
User avatar
Thugsy
Established Forum Member
Posts: 349
Joined: Tue Jan 23, 2007 11:57 am
Location: Kingston

Re: 1950's Riviera disappointment

Post by Thugsy »

longbow wrote:That marker I have - but can you see a down platform without one?
Apologies not sure I fully understand the issue. I have 3 down platforms in effect, the middle one normally used by the Southern, the down bay and the down main (called here the loop). All have markers allowing me to route trains into them and all can be 'physically' seen as in the game. The only problems I am spotting are the lack of a Exeter Middle Box which is easily fixable and the lack of a routing from the down through to the down main which is beyond my tinkering.
choccy
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 1500
Joined: Fri Dec 12, 2003 11:05 pm

Re: 1950's Riviera disappointment

Post by choccy »

All three down lines at Exeter have markers, two of them being platforms. They bear the names Exeter Down Loop Platform, Exeter Down Main LIne (not a platform so therefore a destination marker) and Exeter Down Middle Platform. If you hav been seeking to modify the track layout, a very difficult task in this case, you could easily have deleted a platform marker. Also it would be very easy to delete some signals as there are numerous links in the station.

Mark
Locked

Return to “[TS] General Discussion”