1950's Riviera disappointment
Moderator: Moderators
- holzroller
- Very Active Forum Member
- Posts: 4421
- Joined: Sat Jun 13, 2009 11:00 am
- Location: NE Scotland
Re: 1950's Riviera disappointment
Quite correct, all loco hauled/pushed coach formations should have at least one brake van in their formation.
-
gptech
- Very Active Forum Member
- Posts: 19585
- Joined: Fri Oct 10, 2008 5:48 pm
- Location: Wakefield, West Yorkshire
Re: 1950's Riviera disappointment
or, perhaps more aptly, "Train in vain"?atlasduff47 wrote:based on The Clash song Know Your Rights...........................
- atlasduff47
- Well Established Forum Member
- Posts: 711
- Joined: Sun Nov 11, 2012 2:04 pm
- Location: Firmly in the BR Blue Era
Re: 1950's Riviera disappointment
Nice reference!gptech wrote:or, perhaps more aptly, "Train in vain"?atlasduff47 wrote:based on The Clash song Know Your Rights...........................
"But you don't understand my point of view
I suppose there's nothing I can do"
Andy
- atlasduff47
- Well Established Forum Member
- Posts: 711
- Joined: Sun Nov 11, 2012 2:04 pm
- Location: Firmly in the BR Blue Era
Re: 1950's Riviera disappointment
Which has given me an idea......................
http://forums.uktrainsim.com/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=143063
http://forums.uktrainsim.com/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=143063
Andy
Re: 1950's Riviera disappointment
DTG may have used the larger arms to make them easier to see. Always a problem with semaphores since we lost the "next ahead signal indicator" in the HUDjohny wrote:I can see the reason for folk's objections to 5ft signals, now. Reading the manual it is quite clear that 5ft arms have been used throughout the TS route on mainline track, John
Re: 1950's Riviera disappointment
To be fair, I've not yet driven the route, so should reserve judgement...
However, I previously put a fair bit of research into Exeter St David's, to get the BR blue / semaphore signalled layout of my youth, so I know it can be done
although with some minor compromises...
My main source of disappointment - I've extended modern Riviera to Meldon, and want to do the same for retro Riviera... so St David's bank and the correct layout is important ( for me)
However, I previously put a fair bit of research into Exeter St David's, to get the BR blue / semaphore signalled layout of my youth, so I know it can be done
My main source of disappointment - I've extended modern Riviera to Meldon, and want to do the same for retro Riviera... so St David's bank and the correct layout is important ( for me)
Re: 1950's Riviera disappointment
Are the "iconic" Exeter Middle and West boxes correctly represented...? Remember being an annoyed teenager when Middle box was pulled down 
-
trainfan11111
- Been on the forums for a while
- Posts: 265
- Joined: Sun Nov 08, 2009 1:40 am
- Location: home
Re: 1950's Riviera disappointment
The 57xx class were never autofitted in GWR or BR days though one was fitted with it for a while in preservation IIRCmichaelhendle wrote: I'm also wondering if the DTG 57XX has push\pull apparatus fitted to it?
Mike
- longbow
- Very Active Forum Member
- Posts: 3608
- Joined: Mon Mar 18, 2002 12:00 am
- Location: Noosa, Australia
- Contact:
Re: 1950's Riviera disappointment
The West box is a generic model that looks fairly authentic. But there's no Middle box at all. Now that I've noticed it's missing I shall install the custom model from the Glorious Devon route.Are the "iconic" Exeter Middle and West boxes correctly represented...? Remember being an annoyed teenager when Middle box was pulled down
Re: 1950's Riviera disappointment
Has anyone else found that there is no coal load in the Collett tender for the Hall? I suppose we can use the Hawksworth. I found this with the DT 4F Fowler tender as well, though not completely empty. Must be starting a trend.
tagsdm
tagsdm
- longbow
- Very Active Forum Member
- Posts: 3608
- Joined: Mon Mar 18, 2002 12:00 am
- Location: Noosa, Australia
- Contact:
Re: 1950's Riviera disappointment
Could somebody confirm please that there is no platform marker for the Exeter Down Main Platform? If so I'll email DTG but it's possible I deleted it by mistake.
Re: 1950's Riviera disappointment
On mine it is there but it is called Exeter Down Loop Platform. So not really the right name but it does work.longbow wrote:Could somebody confirm please that there is no platform marker for the Exeter Down Main Platform? If so I'll email DTG but it's possible I deleted it by mistake.
- longbow
- Very Active Forum Member
- Posts: 3608
- Joined: Mon Mar 18, 2002 12:00 am
- Location: Noosa, Australia
- Contact:
Re: 1950's Riviera disappointment
That marker I have - but can you see a down platform without one?
Re: 1950's Riviera disappointment
Apologies not sure I fully understand the issue. I have 3 down platforms in effect, the middle one normally used by the Southern, the down bay and the down main (called here the loop). All have markers allowing me to route trains into them and all can be 'physically' seen as in the game. The only problems I am spotting are the lack of a Exeter Middle Box which is easily fixable and the lack of a routing from the down through to the down main which is beyond my tinkering.longbow wrote:That marker I have - but can you see a down platform without one?
Re: 1950's Riviera disappointment
All three down lines at Exeter have markers, two of them being platforms. They bear the names Exeter Down Loop Platform, Exeter Down Main LIne (not a platform so therefore a destination marker) and Exeter Down Middle Platform. If you hav been seeking to modify the track layout, a very difficult task in this case, you could easily have deleted a platform marker. Also it would be very easy to delete some signals as there are numerous links in the station.
Mark
Mark