Moderator: Moderators
Did you look here?xguerra wrote:I've been through about 20 different 3rd party lua decoder software applications and none of them would do it.
So it seems that DTG are the only people who could make this alteration.
Yep, tried all of those.Juanillo99 wrote:Did you look here?xguerra wrote:I've been through about 20 different 3rd party lua decoder software applications and none of them would do it.
So it seems that DTG are the only people who could make this alteration.
You should look in the "Assembler / Disassembler / Bytecodes" section.
Then (unfortunately) there is nothing we can do.xguerra wrote:Yep, tried all of those.Juanillo99 wrote:Did you look here?xguerra wrote:I've been through about 20 different 3rd party lua decoder software applications and none of them would do it.
So it seems that DTG are the only people who could make this alteration.
You should look in the "Assembler / Disassembler / Bytecodes" section.
I doubt it too.xguerra wrote:I have sent an email to DTG about this, with a calm and peaceful manner, but very much doubt I'll get a response.
I'm not DTG biggest fan, however the Class 319 is a massive improvement compared to any other DLC they have released. What exactly do you mean when you say they seem to be doing the opposite?swtcn91 wrote:I think a petition is in order. They're supposed to be encouraging creativity and improvement, but at the moment, they seem to be doing the opposite.
By using closed .out files. Everything else is accessible.Mr395008 wrote:I'm not DTG biggest fan, however the Class 319 is a massive improvement compared to any other DLC they have released. What exactly do you mean when you say they seem to be doing the opposite?swtcn91 wrote:I think a petition is in order. They're supposed to be encouraging creativity and improvement, but at the moment, they seem to be doing the opposite.
I understand that the sim can process a script file in .out format quicker and easier than one in .lua format.swtcn91 wrote:By using closed .out files. Everything else is accessible.
swtcn91 wrote:I think a petition is in order.
They do not work → http://forums.uktrainsim.com/viewtopic. ... 1#p1696001rfletcher72 wrote:I believe programs exist out there that can decompile an .out file, but the consensus I have picked up on is that these are unreliable.
RSC/DTG are going to be in a pickle if they cannot decompile an .OUT fileJuanillo99 wrote:They do not work.rfletcher72 wrote:I believe programs exist out there that can decompile an .out file, but the consensus I have picked up on is that these are unreliable.
why would they need to?749006 wrote:RSC/DTG are going to be in a pickle if they cannot decompile an .OUT file
As holders of the source files, DTG wouldn't need to decompile their own compiled scripts, as Dave says. One of the reasons most scripts included are compiled is that the code is not open source, particularly as the script is now as much a part of overall product as the model and sounds.749006 wrote:RSC/DTG are going to be in a pickle if they cannot decompile an .OUT fileJuanillo99 wrote:They do not work.rfletcher72 wrote:I believe programs exist out there that can decompile an .out file, but the consensus I have picked up on is that these are unreliable.
It would seem that DTG are not interested, the sim is for anyone to build routes, rolling stock and scenarios so why have they built a duel voltage unit that in real life can use either overhead or 3rd rail pick so why not model it on just that, just because they have no plans to build a route that would use this they have penelised anyone else from building such route for these units to run on, i.e East Croydon to Bedford, although the 377 would work on this not everyone wants to run modern day scenarios, time periods are different to different people.Mr395008 wrote:I'm not DTG biggest fan, however the Class 319 is a massive improvement compared to any other DLC they have released. What exactly do you mean when you say they seem to be doing the opposite?
