GWR Castle from Digital Traction
Moderator: Moderators
- longbow
- Very Active Forum Member
- Posts: 3608
- Joined: Mon Mar 18, 2002 12:00 am
- Location: Noosa, Australia
- Contact:
GWR Castle from Digital Traction
The news is buried away in a comment on Digital Traction's Facebook page, but at last there's a Castle on the way. Pics to follow in a few days they say.
Re: GWR Castle from Digital Traction
Awesome, someone definitely needs to work on putting the RSC Riviera Line 'back in time' in preparation.longbow wrote:The news is buried away in a comment on Digital Traction's Facebook page, but at last there's a Castle on the way. Pics to follow in a few days they say.
Matthew Wilson, development team at Vulcan Productions
http://www.vulcanproductions.co.uk
https://www.facebook.com/VulcanFoundry/
http://www.vulcanproductions.co.uk
https://www.facebook.com/VulcanFoundry/
- longbow
- Very Active Forum Member
- Posts: 3608
- Joined: Mon Mar 18, 2002 12:00 am
- Location: Noosa, Australia
- Contact:
Re: GWR Castle from Digital Traction
I wonder if anyone will feel its worth retro-fying that release given DT's upcoming Plymouth-Penzance route, which looks like it will reach Exeter eventually.Awesome, someone definitely needs to work on putting the RSC Riviera Line 'back in time' in preparation.
http://forums.uktrainsim.com/viewtopic. ... 1&t=136285
Re: GWR Castle from Digital Traction
At this rate DT will be rebuilding Swindon Works and will relocate given their (admirable and much-to-be-encouraged) projects linked to God's (W) Railway. 
- LewisA
- Been on the forums for a while
- Posts: 105
- Joined: Sat Jan 18, 2014 3:18 pm
- Location: Somewhere, England, Earth
Re: GWR Castle from Digital Traction
ABSOLUELY AMAZING!!! I can't wait!! I wonder if it will include 5043 & 7029?
Volunteer on the Severn Valley Railway.

-
bailey7802
- Very Active Forum Member
- Posts: 1215
- Joined: Sat Apr 30, 2011 10:09 am
- Location: Staffordshire
- Contact:
Re: GWR Castle from Digital Traction
This looks interesting, I think that it will be released about April - May - June time, i would love to see
- 4073
- 5043
- 5051
- 5029
- 4079
- 7029
- 5080
Because they are the most familiar to me than any others will they be fitted with AWS and speedometers?
regards
Jake
- 4073
- 5043
- 5051
- 5029
- 4079
- 7029
- 5080
Because they are the most familiar to me than any others will they be fitted with AWS and speedometers?
regards
Jake
Regards
Jake
Volunteer at Burton Model Engineering Society
Jake
Volunteer at Burton Model Engineering Society
-
plewsy2105
- Established Forum Member
- Posts: 420
- Joined: Wed May 27, 2009 2:00 pm
- Location: home
Re: GWR Castle from Digital Traction
great to hear that there is a castle on the way they should be able to do all of them as they all had AWS and speedo's
regards plewsy2105
regards plewsy2105
plewsy 2105
GWR (Gods Wonderful Railway)
LMSNCC (London Midland Scottish Northern County's Committee)
CDRJC (County Donegal Railway Joint Committee)
GWR (Gods Wonderful Railway)
LMSNCC (London Midland Scottish Northern County's Committee)
CDRJC (County Donegal Railway Joint Committee)
- Dave4468
- Well Established Forum Member
- Posts: 859
- Joined: Tue Jan 24, 2012 10:15 pm
- Location: Norwich
Re: GWR Castle from Digital Traction
Did the Castles get AWS? I assume they all had the GWR ATC system fitted but modern AWS?
If only all problems on the big railway could simply be TAB'd past...
-
plewsy2105
- Established Forum Member
- Posts: 420
- Joined: Wed May 27, 2009 2:00 pm
- Location: home
Re: GWR Castle from Digital Traction
aws and ATC are in principle the same system the only difference is one is mechanical and one relies on magnets and electricity
plewsy 2105
GWR (Gods Wonderful Railway)
LMSNCC (London Midland Scottish Northern County's Committee)
CDRJC (County Donegal Railway Joint Committee)
GWR (Gods Wonderful Railway)
LMSNCC (London Midland Scottish Northern County's Committee)
CDRJC (County Donegal Railway Joint Committee)
- Dave4468
- Well Established Forum Member
- Posts: 859
- Joined: Tue Jan 24, 2012 10:15 pm
- Location: Norwich
Re: GWR Castle from Digital Traction
I know. But they are not the same system at all. Yes, they both do the same thing but they are not the same thing. A wind turbine and a nuclear powerstation do the same thing, but you'd be hard pressed to say they were the same thing.
I know some stock was fitted with both AWS and ATC.
I know some stock was fitted with both AWS and ATC.
If only all problems on the big railway could simply be TAB'd past...
- passedcleaner
- Very Active Forum Member
- Posts: 2083
- Joined: Thu Jun 01, 2006 5:06 pm
- Location: Trowbridge
Re: GWR Castle from Digital Traction
One significant difference is that AWS gives the driver 2.7 seconds to respond before applying a full emergency brake application. ATC, being mechanical, would open the brake pipe immediately and start applying the brakes regardless of the driver's response. On a vacuum-fitted train, the brake application is considerably slower than air brakes, so this would actually aid the driver (as he would be about to apply the brakes anyway.) He would, however, be able to cancel the warning and then blow the brakes off, if necessary.
Seb
Seb
Re: GWR Castle from Digital Traction
passedcleaner wrote:One significant difference is that AWS gives the driver 2.7 seconds to respond before applying a full emergency brake application. ATC, being mechanical, would open the brake pipe immediately and start applying the brakes regardless of the driver's response. On a vacuum-fitted train, the brake application is considerably slower than air brakes, so this would actually aid the driver (as he would be about to apply the brakes anyway.) He would, however, be able to cancel the warning and then blow the brakes off, if necessary.
Seb
As I understand it, yes that is correct. its a significant difference from AWS.
http://mysite.du.edu/~etuttle/rail/atcgwr.htm
-
bailey7802
- Very Active Forum Member
- Posts: 1215
- Joined: Sat Apr 30, 2011 10:09 am
- Location: Staffordshire
- Contact:
Re: GWR Castle from Digital Traction
From what I remember Dave,
- 5043
- 5051
- 5029
are all fitted with the modern AWS & TPWS display and the others from my list aren't.
I know the TPWS in ts2014 won't work but we could at least have the buttons?
- 5043
- 5051
- 5029
are all fitted with the modern AWS & TPWS display and the others from my list aren't.
I know the TPWS in ts2014 won't work but we could at least have the buttons?
Regards
Jake
Volunteer at Burton Model Engineering Society
Jake
Volunteer at Burton Model Engineering Society
- kirkheath
- Very Active Forum Member
- Posts: 4678
- Joined: Sun May 08, 2005 4:13 pm
- Location: Stoke-On-Trent
Re: GWR Castle from Digital Traction
The only ones that don't have the safety features are 4073,4079 and 5080 as they ran in the 80's/90's - or atleast before OTMR was introduced and possibly before or around the time of TPWS being brought in. The rest of the class have run mainline since since then.
I myself am thoroughly looking forward to Edgcumbe. She is a great example of the class, a great example of mainline steam at it's best and the class just look great with hawksworth tenders
I myself am thoroughly looking forward to Edgcumbe. She is a great example of the class, a great example of mainline steam at it's best and the class just look great with hawksworth tenders
Member of DMLL. Owners of 7820,3850, 3845 and 2874
Re: GWR Castle from Digital Traction
Britain's best steam engine finally comes to TS
Can't wait
Can't wait