Another poll

Moderator: Moderators

Locked

Fave WHR?

K1
3
27%
A garrett
1
9%
Russell
5
45%
An NG15
1
9%
Castell Caernarfon
1
9%
Upnor Castle
0
No votes
Castell Conwy/Conway Castle
0
No votes
 
Total votes: 11

User avatar
rwaceyw
LMS Guru
Posts: 11524
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2002 12:00 am
Location: Lancashire, England

Another poll

Post by rwaceyw »

Whos your fave NEW WHR engine?
User avatar
BruceB
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 1178
Joined: Thu Jan 23, 2003 8:22 pm
Location: Bangor, N. Wales
Contact:

Post by BruceB »

Um, hard

Proably Russell then K1, then the NGG16s.

Bruce
Spooners TS Founder/Project Co-Ordinator.
http://www.spoonersts.co.uk
-------------------------------------------------------
Image
User avatar
pitleyfalley
Builder of the Southwold Railway Route
Posts: 2366
Joined: Sat Dec 13, 2003 11:56 pm
Location: Tinkering with a new project

Post by pitleyfalley »

I like Russel best, although i think it looks better with the cut down cab to be honest.

Chris
User avatar
garethep
Been on the forums for a while
Posts: 109
Joined: Fri Dec 27, 2002 12:38 am
Location: Gosport

Post by garethep »

K1 An Innovative prototype of a hugely sucessful class of locomotives then the NGG16's for their size!
User avatar
Rfairlie
Well Established Forum Member
Posts: 666
Joined: Tue Dec 10, 2002 3:36 pm
Location: Leyland home of the Truck (well Leyland ones anyway)
Contact:

Post by Rfairlie »

I like Russel best, although i think it looks better with the cut down cab to be honest.
Chris are you sure. Personaly i think that was another FR mistake.

Tim
User avatar
pitleyfalley
Builder of the Southwold Railway Route
Posts: 2366
Joined: Sat Dec 13, 2003 11:56 pm
Location: Tinkering with a new project

Post by pitleyfalley »

I can see why people see it as a FR mistake, and I agree with them that it did to some extent ruin a historic engine (and to be fair they should have checked the width through Moelwyn Tunnel (does anyone know if it will go through today?)). However my personal opinion, is that the cut down version looked nicer than the original. Especailly with the cab backsheet removed. I know it made the engine harder to work because of headroom, however i still think that it gave a bit of contrast and added yet more variety to the life of a very unusual engine.

Chris
User avatar
BruceB
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 1178
Joined: Thu Jan 23, 2003 8:22 pm
Location: Bangor, N. Wales
Contact:

Post by BruceB »

Russell will now fit through the New Moelwyn Tunnel, but not the Garnedd Tunnel, so it still can't work the whole FR. I know what you mean by the cut down version having its attractions, indeed its been so long since it last apeard like that, many people would like to see what it would look like. Russell begin cut down was denfintly NOT a FR mistake, for had it not been cut down, it proably wouldn't be here today. Only because the loco was powerfull, but low, was it perchased by the Hook Norton Railway in 1942. Had the FR not cut it down, it would have gone the sameway as the baldwin.

Bruce
Spooners TS Founder/Project Co-Ordinator.
http://www.spoonersts.co.uk
-------------------------------------------------------
Image
Locked

Return to “Narrow Gauge”