CLASS101 Strathclyde

General discussion about Train Simulator, your thoughts, questions, news and views!

Moderator: Moderators

Rockdoc2174
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 1740
Joined: Thu Jan 12, 2012 7:15 pm
Location: Derby, UK
Contact:

Re: CLASS101 Strathclyde

Post by Rockdoc2174 »

I don't have an intrinsic objection to paying a small amount for an upgrade, whether it's to the basic software or for DLC, but I do want to feel I'm getting value for money with any purchase. If this marketing strategy continues, they might as well change their logo to crossed pistols and a highwayman's mask.....

Keith
ihavenonamenoreallyidont
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 1477
Joined: Sun Nov 29, 2009 9:13 pm
Location: Long Buckby, England

Re: CLASS101 Strathclyde

Post by ihavenonamenoreallyidont »

davejc64 wrote:Well I have just let RSC know how I feel about this by email, it will be interesting to see their response.
Have you tried clearing the cache? :lol:
Paul
Isn’t it enough to see that a garden is beautiful without having to believe that there are fairies at the bottom of it too?” – Douglas Adams
donny
Well Established Forum Member
Posts: 502
Joined: Tue Apr 09, 2002 12:00 am
Location: Scotland

Re: CLASS101 Strathclyde

Post by donny »

AndyUK wrote:
donny wrote:.....I feel that the original, whilst making beautiful eye candy, was sold as sub standard regarding its sounds and physics. Easily implemented fixes have been produced by the community but to date have been completely ignored by RSC (or whatever they are called this week) which to me shows nothing but contempt towards the end user....
Are you saying that the sound and / or physics haven't been improved in this version and as you haven't bought it how do you know?

Andy L
It does state quite clearly in that paragraph that it refers to the original class 101. However, having said that and watched RSCs video of the new version, I am sure I can still hear the screaming engines of the rear car. I would hope that I am wrong.
winifred89
Well Established Forum Member
Posts: 685
Joined: Sun Feb 27, 2011 2:21 pm

Re: CLASS101 Strathclyde

Post by winifred89 »

I will not pay £12 for this , i might only buy it in a sale :o
Varney
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 1030
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 2:22 am

Re: CLASS101 Strathclyde

Post by Varney »

Rockdoc2174 wrote:I don't have an intrinsic objection to paying a small amount for an upgrade, whether it's to the basic software or for DLC, but I do want to feel I'm getting value for money with any purchase. If this marketing strategy continues, they might as well change their logo to crossed pistols and a highwayman's mask.....

Keith
It looks to me their marketing strategy is to see how much they can squeeze us for until we say no more. Judging by the comments so far, I think we might have reached that point. Additionally, I don't think it's going to greatly appeal to the majority of their (younger) facebook 'community' either.

Interestingly the SD-45 (again only one livery) was released yesterday too, same price but with five scenarios and five reskinned wagons.
User avatar
davejc64
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 2209
Joined: Sun Sep 07, 2008 4:31 am
Location: Banbury, Oxfordshire

Re: CLASS101 Strathclyde

Post by davejc64 »

ihavenonamenoreallyidont wrote:Have you tried clearing the cache? :lol:
The only cache RSC want us to clear is our money one! :lol:
"Young boys in the park jumpers for goalposts, that's what football is all about."
User avatar
JamesC
Well Established Forum Member
Posts: 504
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2003 9:39 pm
Location: Stratford-upon-Avon, UK
Contact:

Re: CLASS101 Strathclyde

Post by JamesC »

50% off I would not rush to get it. If it were in BR Blue and Green liveries I would be tempted.
James C
User avatar
davejc64
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 2209
Joined: Sun Sep 07, 2008 4:31 am
Location: Banbury, Oxfordshire

Re: CLASS101 Strathclyde

Post by davejc64 »

Apparently, according to RSC I have an interesting opinion, that was their response to my email stating how I thought they were having a laugh with the £11.99 price tag for the Strathclyde Class 101, considering it was just an re-skin with rain and lighting effects of the original Class 101 DLC, and that they had no loyalty to the original class 101 DLC customers in not upgrading that. :lol:
Last edited by davejc64 on Fri Dec 07, 2012 11:09 am, edited 1 time in total.
"Young boys in the park jumpers for goalposts, that's what football is all about."
nigeltouatievans
Established Forum Member
Posts: 439
Joined: Thu Nov 05, 2009 9:58 am

Re: CLASS101 Strathclyde

Post by nigeltouatievans »

Although I don't necessarily think the old 101 will be upgraded, I also wouldn't take the Facebook comment as meaning it definitely won't happen. I'm sure something similar was said when the class 67 Jubilee was released; 'will not be upgraded' could be meant as 'will not be upgraded as part of this release', not 'will not ever be upgraded'. RSC are not renowned for their good communication.
User avatar
crumplezone
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 2276
Joined: Sat Mar 27, 2010 7:53 pm

Re: CLASS101 Strathclyde

Post by crumplezone »

nigeltouatievans wrote:Although I don't necessarily think the old 101 will be upgraded, I also wouldn't take the Facebook comment as meaning it definitely won't happen. I'm sure something similar was said when the class 67 Jubilee was released; 'will not be upgraded' could be meant as 'will not be upgraded as part of this release', not 'will not ever be upgraded'. RSC are not renowned for their good communication.
It really wasn't in the context of "will not be upgraded as part of this release", the question asked to RSC on facebook was if the 101 pack would get upgraded to TS2013 standards and RSC clearly stated no. Facebook comments from RSC are pretty much considered legitimate now since everything is advertised, informed and put through their facebook page then proceeds to their other social media outlets, if that isn't considered official then I don't really know what can be considered official anymore.
User avatar
davejc64
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 2209
Joined: Sun Sep 07, 2008 4:31 am
Location: Banbury, Oxfordshire

Re: CLASS101 Strathclyde

Post by davejc64 »

And yes I also complained about the Class 67 Jubilee special DLC when that came out.
"Young boys in the park jumpers for goalposts, that's what football is all about."
dumpadillo
Well Established Forum Member
Posts: 796
Joined: Thu Dec 04, 2003 4:54 pm
Location: Pershore

Re: CLASS101 Strathclyde

Post by dumpadillo »

I too was hoping for a better upgrade,I have been waiting to buy this but it won't be on my list with only one livery. What is Railworks thinking of,they are going to alienate the whole of the simming community if they carry on like this.
Dumps
shanyiqua
Been on the forums for a while
Posts: 262
Joined: Tue Dec 20, 2011 11:48 am

Re: CLASS101 Strathclyde

Post by shanyiqua »

sundog wrote:hopefully gear problem fixed.
that needs core improvements, as the diesel mechanical simulation is broken, since RS. But this won't happen as the traction and brake physics is totally untouched since 2007.
User avatar
levisham
Well Established Forum Member
Posts: 771
Joined: Sat Feb 18, 2012 4:19 am
Location: Larnaca, Cyprus

Re: CLASS101 Strathclyde

Post by levisham »

Darren Porter did a SPT reskin, UKTS 26155, but it's no longer available. Perhaps he can be asked to upload his revised version? I do like the 101 but I'm not buying it for one livery and a few scenarios that I cannot use. I don't have the WCML. I'll stick with the 'old' 101 and Darrens' SPT reskin, thank you.

Regards, John.
nigeltouatievans
Established Forum Member
Posts: 439
Joined: Thu Nov 05, 2009 9:58 am

Re: CLASS101 Strathclyde

Post by nigeltouatievans »

levisham wrote:Darren Porter did a SPT reskin, UKTS 26155, but it's no longer available
It's still available from Darren's own site: http://www.dpsimulation.org.uk/reskins.html.
Locked

Return to “[TS] General Discussion”