.jpg/6)
The majority of locations are hardly surprising, but it's a pity that we are at level 2 rather than level 1.
Alec
Moderator: Moderators
.jpg/6)


If our armed forces are smaller we have fewer people to defend us and are thus at more riskGerardFiennes wrote:The size of the army has nothing to do with it.
I hear what you're saying but that map surely does not represent anything to do with the Euro at all. Why is there a large swathe of Africa more 'at risk' than Europe itself?
Then why isn't Tipton red ?rufuskins wrote:Oh dear, it would appear that I have assumed that because I know what it's about then everyone else would.
It seems obvious to me because it forms part of the risk assessment for travelling on company business. The company I work for is a significant global company and hence not only has people working in "interesting" areas but there is also a need for travel by work colleagues. Depending on the region this map would form part of the decision process. If travelling to an area classified as Risk Area 5, then every effort would be made to use alternative means of communication; i.e. telephone or video conference rather than face-to-face.
The risks relate not only to potential terrorism, but also to abduction, etc.
Alec