TPWS

General discussion about RailWorks, your thoughts, questions, news and views!

Moderator: Moderators

dean1986
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 1395
Joined: Tue Mar 20, 2007 8:54 pm
Location: West Wales
Contact:

TPWS

Post by dean1986 »

Have any loco's for Railworks have working TPWS? I don't think I have come across it, if there isn't why has it not been implemented?

Dean
Kariban
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 4478
Joined: Sun Nov 07, 2010 4:10 am

Re: TPWS

Post by Kariban »

If you mean "a working TPWS override button", then not as far as I know. And the problem is/was when I last checked - I was going to add it to the 66 as it has the hooks in the cab model for it - that *everything* is TPWS fitted and you can't intercept TPWS messages coming from the core. You can disable AWS by removing the AWS reset... there is none for TPWS.
My posts are my opinion, and should be read as such.
User avatar
166Driver
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 1135
Joined: Sat Aug 23, 2003 12:05 am
Location: Oxford, UK

Re: TPWS

Post by 166Driver »

It doesn't seem there's fully working TPWS. The emergency brakes come on when going through a red light, but not when you approach a red signal too quickly, or going too fast at a speed check. And there's no vigilance device either.
Kariban
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 4478
Joined: Sun Nov 07, 2010 4:10 am

Re: TPWS

Post by Kariban »

I can't remember which features TPWS has and which are ATP or TVM or any of the other speed profiling systems I've been looking at ... life was so much easier when it was absolute block/gwr ATC :P

*looks stuff up*; ok, the overspeed brake demand ( the you-are-going-too-fast-to-stop ) could be added fairly easily if it's not there already; just needs the TPWS signal to check the approaching train speed, which is simple, and the route builder to set the distance ( and have a reasonable default for back-engineering old routes ). Seems the system uses a simple speed-trap rather than some speed profiling like ATP does, so that makes life considerably easier. I refuse to add vigilance devices to anything.

Doesn't the TPWS in E-G do this already btw?
My posts are my opinion, and should be read as such.
User avatar
FoggyMorning
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 5382
Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2010 1:16 am
Location: In the not too distant future, next Sunday A.D.

Re: TPWS

Post by FoggyMorning »

Yeah, the TPWS on both GARL and E-G has the overspeed function implemented. On the default routes, I think it's more a case of the grids not being in place for the overspeed alert
TransportSteve
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 4645
Joined: Sat Dec 12, 2009 12:43 am
Location: Nottingham, England.

Re: TPWS

Post by TransportSteve »

I didn't think that TPWS had been fully implemented into the game, it's not something that everyone fully understands I wouldn't have thought, especially the kids, who just want to play the career mode scenarios, having TPWS everywhere could wreck their statistics, not something to be taken lightly....... :D

Cheerz. Transport Steve.
i5 4690 3.5GHz Quad Core CPU, Gigabyte Z97-HD3, 16GB RAM, nVidia GTX1060 6GB, WIN 7 PRO 64-bit.
Visit my flickr account - http://www.flickr.com/photos/59849121@N08/
Kariban
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 4478
Joined: Sun Nov 07, 2010 4:10 am

Re: TPWS

Post by Kariban »

FoggyMorning wrote:Yeah, the TPWS on both GARL and E-G has the overspeed function implemented. On the default routes, I think it's more a case of the grids not being in place for the overspeed alert
Well, don't really need that; signals know how far away a train is from them anyway, you could just stick the distance in the flyout for the grid if you wanted a non-default one, takes 6 lines extra in the TPWS grid script. TWPS *is* easy to understand ( the overspeed function is just an early SPAD :) ), it's things like ATP which aren't.
My posts are my opinion, and should be read as such.
dean1986
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 1395
Joined: Tue Mar 20, 2007 8:54 pm
Location: West Wales
Contact:

Re: TPWS

Post by dean1986 »

I think I made a mistake, maybe its not called TPWS. Its a device in the cab kind of like a dead mans, every so often the driver will here a beep and has to cancel it or the brakes will be applied. Is it driver reminding device?

Dean
Kariban
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 4478
Joined: Sun Nov 07, 2010 4:10 am

Re: TPWS

Post by Kariban »

That's a vigilance device ( technically Driver Safety Device or something? ); DaveB likes putting them in, so you can try any of his mods. I take them out, if I start becoming less vigilant I'll press pause instead :P nobody is going to die if I crash anyway, I'll just get annoyed.

TPWS is a system to stop you running red lights.
My posts are my opinion, and should be read as such.
User avatar
pacerpilot
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 1041
Joined: Thu Feb 07, 2008 8:27 pm
Location: God's Wonderful Railway

Re: TPWS

Post by pacerpilot »

The DSD (Drivers Safety Device) is the pedal itself, requiring it to be pressed down in order to obtain brake release. The DVD (Drivers Vigilance Device) is part of the DSD equipment, sounding the bleeper if no movement of the brake/power handle has been made for 60seconds.
Newer stock has a random DVD which activates a various times, regardless of whether the driver has moved the controls
jimmyshand
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 2391
Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 8:08 am

Re: TPWS

Post by jimmyshand »

I would also like to see this function introduced as default and for a couple of reasons; first because it's realistic and I'm after as much realism as possible when driving and secondly because I need it for the exact reason it exists in the real world, to stop me falling asleep!!

I've started driving scenarios set at night and in the rain alot (for obvious reasons) and coupled with the fact I often drive them late in the evening at home then the long open expanses of Darlington to York induce a severe case of nodding dog syndrome!! A vigilance alarm going off every minute or so would work wonders to keep me alert and awake just as it does no doubt in the real world. In fact not having this function in Railworks serves as a very realistic experiment of just how risky it would be for a night driver in the real world to not have this device. Often on long expanses of track under green signals there is nothing to do for up to half an hour (Darlington to York stretch prime example) and within minutes the nodding dog kicks in and you're headbutting the monitor! There really is a need to have something to keep you awake and with it.

Would be nice to have it as an option so those that don't want it can turn it off but those that want the ultra-realistic cab experience can get just that.
User avatar
pacerpilot
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 1041
Joined: Thu Feb 07, 2008 8:27 pm
Location: God's Wonderful Railway

Re: TPWS

Post by pacerpilot »

jimmyshand wrote: A vigilance alarm going off every minute or so would work wonders to keep me alert and awake just as it does no doubt in the real world. In fact not having this function in Railworks serves as a very realistic experiment of just how risky it would be for a night driver in the real world to not have this device.
The Pacers and 156s dont have vigilance fitted, not a even a beeper to alert you that your foot has come off the DSD. An emergency brake application is the first you know about it :oops:
jimmyshand
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 2391
Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 8:08 am

Re: TPWS

Post by jimmyshand »

pacerpilot wrote:
jimmyshand wrote: A vigilance alarm going off every minute or so would work wonders to keep me alert and awake just as it does no doubt in the real world. In fact not having this function in Railworks serves as a very realistic experiment of just how risky it would be for a night driver in the real world to not have this device.
The Pacers and 156s dont have vigilance fitted, not a even a beeper to alert you that your foot has come off the DSD. An emergency brake application is the first you know about it :oops:
I'm surprised to hear that in this modern health and safety obsessed world! I suppose in theory it is perfectly possible for you to fall asleep with your foot still on the pedal? Yikes! Although I guess Pacers and the like are not generally going to be used on routes where you would be driving for dozens of miles without having to do anything, I'd imagine driving a Pacer on a local line is pretty hands on stuff with lots to do and constant speed changes
User avatar
Esurient
Well Established Forum Member
Posts: 600
Joined: Fri Jul 28, 2006 9:17 pm
Location: Peterborough

Re: TPWS

Post by Esurient »

jimmyshand wrote:
pacerpilot wrote:
jimmyshand wrote: A vigilance alarm going off every minute or so would work wonders to keep me alert and awake just as it does no doubt in the real world. In fact not having this function in Railworks serves as a very realistic experiment of just how risky it would be for a night driver in the real world to not have this device.
The Pacers and 156s dont have vigilance fitted, not a even a beeper to alert you that your foot has come off the DSD. An emergency brake application is the first you know about it :oops:
I'm surprised to hear that in this modern health and safety obsessed world! I suppose in theory it is perfectly possible for you to fall asleep with your foot still on the pedal?
Even if you did fall asleep with your foot on the pedal, you'd still get an emergency brake application I thought? You've gotta release your foot and re-press the pedal within like 2-5 seconds or else the brakes kick in... That's what I thought anyway.
PC Specs:
Intel Core i7-2600 3.40GHz 8MB Cache - Overclocked to 4.8GHz
16384MB Dual Channel DDR3
2TB Dual HDD RAID
(Slightly overclocked) Gefoce GTX 570 GPU
Corsair 1200W PSU
Windows 7 Ultimate x64
40" Samsung 1080p Monitor
User avatar
pacerpilot
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 1041
Joined: Thu Feb 07, 2008 8:27 pm
Location: God's Wonderful Railway

Re: TPWS

Post by pacerpilot »

No, thats what vigilance is for. 14x series units and 156s are not equipped with vigilance. Pressing the DSD simply allows brake released to be obtained.
Locked

Return to “[RW] General RW Discussion”