wcml north problems after railworks 2

General discussion about RailWorks, your thoughts, questions, news and views!

Moderator: Moderators

malcolmowen
Established Forum Member
Posts: 303
Joined: Sat Sep 20, 2008 5:29 pm

wcml north problems after railworks 2

Post by malcolmowen »

hello all i now have the railworks 2 update and all i can say is its rubbish , nothing diffrent apart from menu , the controller looks like a 2 year old did it :(
and on top of all that the wcml north has being wrecked , no wires , tracks gone , speed signs say 0 , no signals , class 86 missing , and when i sellect the route its not there in the tick box thing so i wonder where its gone ??????????? all in all i rate 2 out of 100 :( how do i get rid of the update ? should of said no to it and turned it off :x
jimmyshand
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 2391
Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 8:08 am

Re: wcml north problems after railworks 2

Post by jimmyshand »

welcome to the club mate, I had major dramas too with my upgrade.

Try going onto Steam and verifying the cache. This will check your install for missing items and re-download them if it finds any missing. I think some of us must have received a dodgy download because when I ran the verify cache I had something like 115 files missing. Most of my issues were resolved after doing this.

Don't forget also to clear the blueprint cache from the initial RW start screen under tools&docs tab.
User avatar
gypbrc
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 1813
Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2010 8:09 pm

Re: wcml north problems after railworks 2

Post by gypbrc »

malcolmowen wrote:hello all i now have the railworks 2 update and all i can say is its rubbish , nothing diffrent apart from menu , the controller looks like a 2 year old did it :(
and on top of all that the wcml north has being wrecked , no wires , tracks gone , speed signs say 0 , no signals , class 86 missing , and when i sellect the route its not there in the tick box thing so i wonder where its gone ??????????? all in all i rate 2 out of 100 :( how do i get rid of the update ? should of said no to it and turned it off :x
dunt fink u can mate tiz not backwerd compatibble and so maybez u shud go play sumfink elze dat way u wnt get annoyoiled nd come tell uz abut it
User avatar
smarty2
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 9976
Joined: Sun Aug 21, 2005 8:16 am
Location: 1963, at Snow Hill!
Contact:

Re: wcml north problems after railworks 2

Post by smarty2 »

Isn't it strange? I think its really worked well and I have had no issues whatsoever. So I won't if you don't mind be joining the hell and damnation club just yet! :lol:
Best Regards
Martin (smarty2)
Non technically minded individual!

Is There A God?
Dudley Bible web page
malcolmowen
Established Forum Member
Posts: 303
Joined: Sat Sep 20, 2008 5:29 pm

Re: wcml north problems after railworks 2

Post by malcolmowen »

smarty2 wrote:Isn't it strange? I think its really worked well and I have had no issues whatsoever. So I won't if you don't mind be joining the hell and damnation club just yet! :lol:
rub it in lol :lol:
thanks for the suggestons guys ill try them and see what happends lol 8)
User avatar
Wikkus
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 3480
Joined: Tue Dec 04, 2001 12:00 am
Location: Malta

Re: wcml north problems after railworks 2

Post by Wikkus »

malcolmowen wrote:all i can say is rubbish
Quite.

Your dummy's over there --->

R.
malcolmowen
Established Forum Member
Posts: 303
Joined: Sat Sep 20, 2008 5:29 pm

Re: wcml north problems after railworks 2

Post by malcolmowen »

when you say click on verifying the cache where do i find it lol ? as i can only find clear the cache
transadelaide
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 2659
Joined: Mon Nov 23, 2009 12:30 pm
Location: Adelaide, South Australia

Re: wcml north problems after railworks 2

Post by transadelaide »

malcolmowen wrote:when you say click on verifying the cache where do i find it lol ? as i can only find clear the cache
There is a big difference between clearing the blueprint cache - the button in the tools % docs tab which you should run after installing any new assets - and verifying the local cache in Steam, which is basically checking all RW files distributed by Steam and re-downloading those that are corrupted or missing. To find detailed instructions on doing this in Steam read page 24 of http://www.railsimulator.com/quickstart.pdf
Image
sanyix
Been on the forums for a while
Posts: 232
Joined: Wed Mar 03, 2010 7:24 pm

Re: wcml north problems after railworks 2

Post by sanyix »

Steam can't find the corrupted files, it makes a very shallow check. Ive tested in last week, when none of the default german routes worked, because a partition resize corrupted some files. I made steam check 3 times... didn't found any problems... so i needed to delete reinstall the whole game.
But at wcml problems, there isnt about corrupted or missing files, since i've reinstalled that too 4 times, and still not works, while it worked before. Yesterday i got missing class 86 engines and no track, today i got a simple sbhh problem...
My top wishes: Realistic engine physics - Superelevation - Multi-core support - Remove Physix engine, and use better one
User avatar
Wikkus
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 3480
Joined: Tue Dec 04, 2001 12:00 am
Location: Malta

Re: wcml north problems after railworks 2

Post by Wikkus »

sanyix wrote:Steam can't find the corrupted files
Aren't they using .md5 checksumming?

R.
sanyix
Been on the forums for a while
Posts: 232
Joined: Wed Mar 03, 2010 7:24 pm

Re: wcml north problems after railworks 2

Post by sanyix »

Wikkus wrote:
sanyix wrote:Steam can't find the corrupted files
Aren't they using .md5 checksumming?

R.
Apparently they not.
My top wishes: Realistic engine physics - Superelevation - Multi-core support - Remove Physix engine, and use better one
USRailFan
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 4226
Joined: Wed May 14, 2003 8:07 am
Location: Norway

Re: wcml north problems after railworks 2

Post by USRailFan »

Wikkus wrote:
sanyix wrote:Steam can't find the corrupted files
Aren't they using .md5 checksumming?
Only for (some) scenario-related files.
User avatar
Kromaatikse
For Quality & Playability
Posts: 2733
Joined: Fri Jun 12, 2009 5:39 pm
Location: Helsinki

Re: wcml north problems after railworks 2

Post by Kromaatikse »

Steam does find and correct corrupted files, provided they are files that were originally provided via Steam. If they are in a cache, created locally, or installed from a third-party disc, then they won't be considered by the verification.

If you know which file it is, try deleting it entirely. Otherwise, try deleting (or just moving) the whole RailWorks directory and re-downloading it. If you moved it, then in principle you can compare the two and find out what was wrong.
The key to knowledge is not to rely on others to teach you it.
User avatar
Wikkus
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 3480
Joined: Tue Dec 04, 2001 12:00 am
Location: Malta

Re: wcml north problems after railworks 2

Post by Wikkus »

And the below is an example of the FUD distribution network in action...
sanyix wrote:
Wikkus wrote:
sanyix wrote:Steam can't find the corrupted files
Aren't they using .md5 checksumming?

R.
Apparently they not.
...and then...
USRailFan wrote:
Wikkus wrote:
sanyix wrote:Steam can't find the corrupted files
Aren't they using .md5 checksumming?
Only for (some) scenario-related files.
Two different perspectives; which is "right"? More importantly, how is the 'casual reader' supposed to know what's legitimate and genuine fact versus what is hyperbole and supposition?

In other realms, this sort of thing would be repudiated or challenged with some requirement to quote/reference sources, but here, one person says one thing (often ad infinitum) and it suddenly becomes "fact"...
:bad-words:

Rik.
CaptScarlet
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 3673
Joined: Fri Nov 17, 2006 11:29 am
Location: The Netherlands

Re: wcml north problems after railworks 2

Post by CaptScarlet »

It all depends on who "they" are. RSC do have some .md5 checksums for the career scenarios to stop editing those scenario files but what Steam does or does not do is a different matter.

John
Locked

Return to “[RW] General RW Discussion”