Which routes would you like to see produced?

General discussion about RailWorks, your thoughts, questions, news and views!

Moderator: Moderators

Which routes would you like in RW???

London King Cross to York
67
18%
Newcastle to Edinburgh/Glasgow
40
10%
London Euston to Birmingham/Liverpool
62
16%
London Euston to Preston
37
10%
Preston to Glasgow
25
7%
Cross Country Route
31
8%
Great Eastern Mainline
30
8%
Great Western Mainline
48
13%
Midlinds Mainline
42
11%
 
Total votes: 382

dipper6
Well Established Forum Member
Posts: 501
Joined: Fri Feb 08, 2008 3:12 pm
Location: Lisburn UK

Re: Which routes would you like to see produced?

Post by dipper6 »

Oldpufferspotter wrote:Hi all,
This is just a thought:
In a prototypical route, would it be acceptable to compress any part of the route? I'm thinking in terms of squeezing long sections of plain track and monotonous scenery into a short section between stations. Or is that a non-starter?
regards Ted.
I agree, whats the point in having to look at the very boring sections, its not a "true" rail simulator is RW where you
must have everything in the route, if people want that then they should buy a true simulator that the Train companies use.

Though the RW (I'm not referring to RS Derek etc) route and other items, programmers are doing a wonderfull job in what they are doing, there is no argument on that at all. Those boring bits could put some people off RW.
--------------------
Have a good day.
IanW
kennyb
Well Established Forum Member
Posts: 556
Joined: Fri Aug 10, 2007 6:37 am
Location: Birmingham ish

Re: Which routes would you like to see produced?

Post by kennyb »

by pdeee on 09 Apr 2010 16:26

I would like to see the S&D extended to Wimborne and Broadstone, with all those lovely little countryside stations and goods yards...... .
I second that !!!!

Ken
User avatar
pdeee
Well Established Forum Member
Posts: 667
Joined: Wed Dec 05, 2001 12:00 am
Location: Blaby, Leicester.

Re: Which routes would you like to see produced?

Post by pdeee »

hertsbob wrote:
pdeee wrote:...the Scenario Editor cannot cope with running a simple pickup goods calling at a few stations, leave its train on the main line, shunt the yard, couple up to the train, then repeat at the next station.
Are you referring specifically to the S&D here? I've written two pick-up goods scenarios without having issues. If anything I was amazed at how it just worked without any problems.

Cheers

Bob
Hi Bob,
Sorry so long in answering your question, had a busy week-end and yes I am only talking about the S&D, I do like all those small stations and goods yards, along with the driving challenge, but first, what a great route Leafy Suburbs is, congratulations on such fine work, looking forwards to the next version.

I have ran the South Bound Goods and found it an excellent scenario, and by looking at the structure of it, I have learned a lot and am now starting to get somewhere with what I want to do, I think I am maybe wrong in my statement about the Editor, I hope so as I would love it to work correctly.

If there was only a way to print out the scenario details instead of having to refer to the F1 function all the time, which I find spoils the atmosphere.
Regards.

Pat.

Skipton to Carlisle 1920
LMSR Rolling Stock CD.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/27518426@N03/
User avatar
alanch
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 4907
Joined: Mon Feb 27, 2006 6:07 pm
Location: Leeds, England
Contact:

Re: Which routes would you like to see produced?

Post by alanch »

pdeee wrote:I have ran the South Bound Goods and found it an excellent scenario, and by looking at the structure of it, I have learned a lot and am now starting to get somewhere with what I want to do, I think I am maybe wrong in my statement about the Editor, I hope so as I would love it to work correctly.
Hi Pat

I have found that by using the new Timetable View with waypoints and stop at commands, combined with scenario specific markers, you can get a fair degree of control of AI in scenarios. I've experimented with the drop off command for AI, without much success so far, but others are making it work - it seems to depend on the stock used, perhaps due to the way the couplings are set up.
Alan

My railway photos are now on Google + - links to the albums are in this thread http://forums.uktrainsim.com/viewtopic. ... 9&t=149558

Lots of steam and early diesels from 1959 to 1963.
User avatar
hertsbob
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 4055
Joined: Fri Oct 19, 2007 6:11 pm

Re: Which routes would you like to see produced?

Post by hertsbob »

Thanks Pat. Really pleased you like it.

I can't claim to be any kind of expert in scenario writing, which is mainly why I was surprised that the Southbound Goods scenario worked at all! I'm definitely going to have a go using Timetabled scenarios in future, especially having seen the excellent work that Sly has been doing with them.

To answer the main thread question, from my point of view I'd love to see the Great Central in RW. I'm not too demanding, Marylebone to Nottingham Victoria would be fine for starters! :wink:

Cheers

Bob
"Smoke me a kipper, I'll be back for breakfast!"
Commander Arnold Judas Rimmer


Things have finally happened!
http://dereksiddle.blogspot.co.uk/
User avatar
pjt1974
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 3800
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2010 8:30 pm
Location: Ballaugh Isle of Man
Contact:

Re: Which routes would you like to see produced?

Post by pjt1974 »

I've voted for the Great Western but hows about a total Brunell Broadgauge (7ft and 1/4 inch) version all the way to Bristol. Although the idea of former routes lifted by the Beeching act being available would, I presume, be a great selling tool for the add-on, especially to those of us who get all nostalgic. Can you imagine having all the old routes in Greater Manchester to drive along.
For disclosure, I am affiliated with a third party developer however, I do not know anything about any future releases unless I'm working on them and even then, I'd be breaking years worth of built up trust to say anything about it ;-)
stuart666
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 2104
Joined: Tue Feb 17, 2009 7:53 pm

Re: Which routes would you like to see produced?

Post by stuart666 »

pjt1974 wrote:I've voted for the Great Western but hows about a total Brunell Broadgauge (7ft and 1/4 inch) version all the way to Bristol. Although the idea of former routes lifted by the Beeching act being available would, I presume, be a great selling tool for the add-on, especially to those of us who get all nostalgic. Can you imagine having all the old routes in Greater Manchester to drive along.
Ive often thought broad gauge would be an excellent idea for a Rail works route. It would probably only be doable as payware though, you would need so much new stock. Not only would you need track and locomotives, but even the signaling looked very different back then.

Got my vote though, FWIW.

The other thing Id like to see done is more London routes. I can appreciate there are good reasons why people give up on them (think of all those buildings!), but something like HS1 would be very popular Im sure. Particularly with Javelins.

For a really off the wall one, how about Brunels Pneumatic railway?
User avatar
pjt1974
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 3800
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2010 8:30 pm
Location: Ballaugh Isle of Man
Contact:

Re: Which routes would you like to see produced?

Post by pjt1974 »

My rule of thumb about payware, whether it be for flight or rail sim, is how different is the add on to anything else i've already got.
for example the only add on I paid for on RS was the IOW which opened up so much more in terms of extra user created routes. Maybe an addon disc dedicated to Brunell would be different enough for it to be a commercial success.
For disclosure, I am affiliated with a third party developer however, I do not know anything about any future releases unless I'm working on them and even then, I'd be breaking years worth of built up trust to say anything about it ;-)
User avatar
maddog989
Established Forum Member
Posts: 343
Joined: Sat May 24, 2008 11:25 pm

Re: Which routes would you like to see produced?

Post by maddog989 »

A south wales valleys route set in steam era (20/30s) with the masses of coal mines, sidings and down to the docks is a route that'd be excellent for railworks, the extensive sidings and lines in the valleys and the docks at cardiff/penarth/barry etc. would be excellently captured in railworks in my opinion!
Currently recreating Salisbury to Exeter 50s/60s.
almost all yard, trackwork, scenery and signalling complete salisbury - wilton. Trackwork 2013 standard to Gillingham, Older beyond. - Abandoned due to newer tools in subsequent TS versions.
User avatar
alanch
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 4907
Joined: Mon Feb 27, 2006 6:07 pm
Location: Leeds, England
Contact:

Re: Which routes would you like to see produced?

Post by alanch »

maddog989 wrote:A south wales valleys route set in steam era (20/30s) with the masses of coal mines, sidings and down to the docks is a route that'd be excellent for railworks, the extensive sidings and lines in the valleys and the docks at cardiff/penarth/barry etc. would be excellently captured in railworks in my opinion!
It wouldn't have to be restricted to the 1920/30s - on my one shed bashing trip to the area in 1958 the valleys were still incredibly busy.
Alan

My railway photos are now on Google + - links to the albums are in this thread http://forums.uktrainsim.com/viewtopic. ... 9&t=149558

Lots of steam and early diesels from 1959 to 1963.
User avatar
blackthunder36
Been on the forums for a while
Posts: 221
Joined: Mon Oct 20, 2008 12:56 pm
Location: standing at the walsden end of summit tunnel

Re: Which routes would you like to see produced?

Post by blackthunder36 »

maybe a line linking liverpool/manchester to sheffield via the woodhead line which should be worth doing
User avatar
corbeau77
Getting the hang of things now
Posts: 40
Joined: Mon Jul 27, 2009 8:42 am

Re: Which routes would you like to see produced?

Post by corbeau77 »

It would certainly be nice to see a 1920/30s focused route though
User avatar
mundo
Been on the forums for a while
Posts: 211
Joined: Fri Oct 31, 2008 11:50 pm
Location: London

Re: Which routes would you like to see produced?

Post by mundo »

I've gone for the KX-York and GE routes as they are the ones I'm most familiar with.

But I'd also be interested in an American urban freight line. Looking at Google Earth there seem to be a lot of US cities with large networks of disused tracks running along and crossing over streets, including Manhattan Island. I think they could make for interesting shunting puzzle type routes. I know there are a couple of US payware routes but they seem to be more rural.

I do enjoy the high speed UK routes but as I have a Freeview decoder plumbed into my pc, I tend to watch the telly whilst waiting for an AWS warning to tell me I have to do something.

Cheers

Mundo
Trainzer1400
Been on the forums for a while
Posts: 103
Joined: Mon Aug 24, 2009 6:34 pm
Location: South of Liverpool, North of Bristol, West of Worcester, East of Dublin

Re: Which routes would you like to see produced?

Post by Trainzer1400 »

corbeau77 wrote:It would certainly be nice to see a 1920/30s focused route though
Yup, they would give more variety.

Even earlier periods would also be welcomed by me.

Dave.
Auran Trainz Beta Tester TRS2004 - TS2010 and onwards.
User avatar
corbeau77
Getting the hang of things now
Posts: 40
Joined: Mon Jul 27, 2009 8:42 am

Re: Which routes would you like to see produced?

Post by corbeau77 »

Trainzer1400 wrote: Even earlier periods would also be welcomed by me.

Dave.
I would certainly like to see something Edwardian, and 1840s would be great too
Locked

Return to “[RW] General RW Discussion”