SSS SVR route

[gptech]

I think Ash has answered that question

He did state on page 5 of this thread;

It looks like the latest version of this route (1d) has removed the pesky speed limitations.

so I suggest you ask him which statement is right. (He supposedly has me on ignore so may not see this)

[ashgray]

I think Ash has answered that question

He did state on page 5 of this thread;

It looks like the latest version of this route (1d) has removed the pesky speed limitations.

so I suggest you ask him which statement is right. (He supposedly has me on ignore so may not see this)

Actually, both my statements are correct.

Ash

[gptech]

the vast majority of the scenarios for it are fundamentally flawed.

So are these newly discovered/reported faults?

[ashgray]

the vast majority of the scenarios for it are fundamentally flawed.

So are these newly discovered/reported faults?

No, as a proper reading of my two posts should tell you.

Ash

[gptech]

No, as a proper reading of my two posts should tell you.

Which two out of the twenty-something?

You've concentrated on the timing issue, which is/(was?) a widespread scenario issue, but any discussion of graphical issues is not. You mentioned an issue with one of the Pullman scenarios, nearly a collision, but that one scenario issue doesn't equate to the majority of scenarios being flawed if the speeding issue has been resolved as per your post on page 5.

[ashgray]

No, as a proper reading of my two posts should tell you.

Which two out of the twenty-something?

Er, given the context, obviously the post you quoted at the top of this page and the post that Derek quoted on the previous page.

You've concentrated on the timing issue, which is/(was?) a widespread scenario issue...

If you'd spent more time actually reading my posts properly instead of sniping at them, you'd realise that I have not mentioned any problems with timing anywhere in this thread. How then could I possibly have "concentrated" on it?

You mentioned an issue with one of the Pullman scenarios, nearly a collision, but that one scenario issue doesn't equate to the majority of scenarios being flawed if the speeding issue has been resolved as per your post on page 5.

Where did I say that the one example I gave of a collision / pathing problem was the ONLY issue with the rest of the scenarios? Empirical evidence told me they were flawed, as a general point, for various reasons. And why are you assuming that fixing the speeding issue has necessarily fixed those other issues? It plainly hasn't, as other have also found.

Your attitude towards me in this thread has been arrogant, combative and condescending - your "trademarks". I cannot imagine why I didn't report you at the time, but it must be obvious even to you why that attitude caused me to place you on ignore, where you'll remain. Perhaps your uncharacteristic lack of precision above has been caused by a less than objective view of what's been said, causing your apparent confusion. I only opened your post to read it in context with those from other members, to see if the problems have been fixed.

Ash

[gptech]

I have not mentioned any problems with timing anywhere in this thread

True, I meant speeding...no idea why I wrote timing.

Where did I say that the one example I gave of a collision / pathing problem was the ONLY issue with the rest of the scenarios?

You didn't, which is why I asked if the flaws were ones not previously highlighted.

why are you assuming that fixing the speeding issue has necessarily fixed those other issues? It plainly hasn't, as other have also found.

Once again, other scenario flaws haven't been highlighted. Frankly (I won't insult you further by calling you "my dear") I don't give a damn about it as it isn't a route I'm interested in but Derek obviously is. I'm sure he'd find knowing what some/most/all of the problems with the scenarios actually were.

[shinymac]

This is blown into a big issue.

I just want to know, are the scenarios that had faults, now fixed ? In other words is it worth it for me to download the route or not ? From my own perspective there is no point in me downloading the route only to find that the scenarios are faulty !

I await a simple answer !

Derek

[ashgray]

Derek

No.

Ash

[shinymac]

Derek

No.

Ash

Phew at LAST....a simple answer !

Thank You Ash

[Drogba11CFC]

Is anyone else having a problem with missing textures beyond Bewdley?

[hoover01]

Having trouble running this route, managed to get to drive to hampton loade once but signals were against me and the was a train in the platform. Tried starting at kidderminster and its loaded 3 times but as soon as i press any key it freezes up, ive since tried to start from bridgnorth but it crashes and says out of memory cx00005. A couple of items needed i cannot install for some reason, when i launch the package manager and select the file i want it says assets are already installed but they dont show on the left hand side of the screen, neither do they show in the game itself. Namely the east somerset railway and spa valley line. I have everything else that it says are needed to run the game, is it because these are missing? All other routes run fine with no problems.

[gptech]

when i launch the package manager and select the file i want it says assets are already installed but they dont show on the left hand side of the screen, neither do they show in the game itself. Namely the east somerset railway and spa valley line.

Do you have RW Tools/TS Tools installed?

[hoover01]

Hi there
I have the utilities exe on the desktop that i use to install a couple of rwp files. Fairly new to the editing side of things despite having trainsimulator from the beginning.

[gptech]

I have the utilities exe on the desktop

The file itself or a short cut pointing to where it should be?

Go to http://www.agenetools.com/downloads.html and download Mike's TS Tools. If your Anti Virus blocks the site it's OK to allow access.

Install TS Tools and we'll move on from there.