JT Midland Mainline scenario 1Q34 Derby RTC - Hull

General discussion about Train Simulator, your thoughts, questions, news and views!

Moderator: Moderators

User avatar
earwigo
Established Forum Member
Posts: 419
Joined: Mon Nov 17, 2003 2:46 pm
Location: U.K.

Re: JT Midland Mainline scenario 1Q34 Derby RTC - Hull

Post by earwigo »

Hi gptech. Here is a screen print of the error message.
As ever, thanks for your help.
Stuart.
Attachments
Trainsim printscreen 2a.jpg
USRailFan
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 4226
Joined: Wed May 14, 2003 8:07 am
Location: Norway

Re: JT Midland Mainline scenario 1Q34 Derby RTC - Hull

Post by USRailFan »

A bit small on my screen to make out exactly what it says, and it becomes too blurry when scaled, but looks like you're missing the AP Mk2 pack, at least.
I'm not fat - I'm easy to see
gptech
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 19585
Joined: Fri Oct 10, 2008 5:48 pm
Location: Wakefield, West Yorkshire

Re: JT Midland Mainline scenario 1Q34 Derby RTC - Hull

Post by gptech »

I can't read that....can you produce a higher definition section with just the message, or link to the full sized screen shot?

or...you could just type out what's missing.….
USRailFan
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 4226
Joined: Wed May 14, 2003 8:07 am
Location: Norway

Re: JT Midland Mainline scenario 1Q34 Derby RTC - Hull

Post by USRailFan »

Sorry, I was mistaken in my previous post. It calls for the AP Mk2a-c coaches in a Network Rail livery, and a loco skin from AP that I can't make out (Class 37?) and also what looks like some sort of DMU. I don't see the AP Mk2 pack actually mentioned among the requirements at JT's website though...
I'm not fat - I'm easy to see
gptech
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 19585
Joined: Fri Oct 10, 2008 5:48 pm
Location: Wakefield, West Yorkshire

Re: JT Midland Mainline scenario 1Q34 Derby RTC - Hull

Post by gptech »

There are no MKII coaches in the scenario; it looks like the coaches are marked as NR which indicates that the NMT is one of the problematic consists.

This is what the scenario calls for:

Image

earwigo, have you tried swapping stock out at all?
USRailFan
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 4226
Joined: Wed May 14, 2003 8:07 am
Location: Norway

Re: JT Midland Mainline scenario 1Q34 Derby RTC - Hull

Post by USRailFan »

The NR and XC HST reskins both seem to be from the AP MTU HST Enhancement Pack. Could it be as simple as the OP having an old version of this, which might not have the NR reskin? If so I'd guess a redownload and reinstall of the AP MTU HST pack would solve it?
I'm not fat - I'm easy to see
User avatar
earwigo
Established Forum Member
Posts: 419
Joined: Mon Nov 17, 2003 2:46 pm
Location: U.K.

Re: JT Midland Mainline scenario 1Q34 Derby RTC - Hull

Post by earwigo »

Hello gptech. Here is a screenshot of the error message I get when trying to run the scenario.
Attachments
Trainsim printscreen 3.JPG
User avatar
earwigo
Established Forum Member
Posts: 419
Joined: Mon Nov 17, 2003 2:46 pm
Location: U.K.

Re: JT Midland Mainline scenario 1Q34 Derby RTC - Hull

Post by earwigo »

I've tried to get a reply posted twice, but for some reason it isn't showing my posts.
I wanted to show gptech what the screen shows when I try to start the scenario.
The file's attached.
I hope it shows my post this time.
Attachments
Trainsim printscreen 3.JPG
gptech
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 19585
Joined: Fri Oct 10, 2008 5:48 pm
Location: Wakefield, West Yorkshire

Re: JT Midland Mainline scenario 1Q34 Derby RTC - Hull

Post by gptech »

Nope, still unreadable.
User avatar
earwigo
Established Forum Member
Posts: 419
Joined: Mon Nov 17, 2003 2:46 pm
Location: U.K.

Re: JT Midland Mainline scenario 1Q34 Derby RTC - Hull

Post by earwigo »

....and now it comes up twice!
Sorry about that.
USRailFan
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 4226
Joined: Wed May 14, 2003 8:07 am
Location: Norway

Re: JT Midland Mainline scenario 1Q34 Derby RTC - Hull

Post by USRailFan »

Class 31 Network Rail
A string of Mk2s in Network Rail
A DMU, looks like a 158 since it says DMSLA.
Looks like missing stock from AP, possibly reskins from an Extra Stock Pack?
I'm not fat - I'm easy to see
gptech
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 19585
Joined: Fri Oct 10, 2008 5:48 pm
Location: Wakefield, West Yorkshire

Re: JT Midland Mainline scenario 1Q34 Derby RTC - Hull

Post by gptech »

Does it say it can't load:

Network Rail Class 31
5 Network Rail MKII coaches
and an Ex Northern Rail Class 158 DMSLA?

Have you tried swapping stock with RW Tools?
USRailFan
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 4226
Joined: Wed May 14, 2003 8:07 am
Location: Norway

Re: JT Midland Mainline scenario 1Q34 Derby RTC - Hull

Post by USRailFan »

gptech wrote:Does it say it can't load:

Network Rail Class 31
5 Network Rail MKII coaches
and an Ex Northern Rail Class 158 DMSLA?
That's what it looks like to me too. Looks like all AP stuff? Possibly a missing Extra Stock pack?
I'm not fat - I'm easy to see
gptech
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 19585
Joined: Fri Oct 10, 2008 5:48 pm
Location: Wakefield, West Yorkshire

Re: JT Midland Mainline scenario 1Q34 Derby RTC - Hull

Post by gptech »

USRailFan wrote:Possibly a missing Extra Stock pack?
Yeah, quite possibly or an incomplete installation of a pack---issues with .exe installers is nothing new!
However, that doesn't explain the disparity between what I see used in the scenario, what the manual says is used, and the error message being generated.
USRailFan
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 4226
Joined: Wed May 14, 2003 8:07 am
Location: Norway

Re: JT Midland Mainline scenario 1Q34 Derby RTC - Hull

Post by USRailFan »

Wouldn't be the first time something had been forgotten to put in a manual. Easy oversight to do when there's a lot of stuff used. I've made the mistake myself with my 'Sussex Scot' scenario... Could also, as I said in a previous post, be that the OP has an outdated version of one or more of the stock packs, sometimes AP's Enhancement Packs or Wagon/Loco packs get extra reskins added to them after the release.
I'm not fat - I'm easy to see
Post Reply

Return to “[TS] General Discussion”