Page 2 of 3
Re: DTG Class 142 pacer
Posted: Sat Oct 05, 2019 3:27 pm
by 749006
OT
Springer6 wrote:...... we were confronted by several brand new 195 sets, parked in a siding. The 142's guard assured me that they would soon be in service,
The 195s and 331s are already in service
195s work Manchester to Barrow and Windermere
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/British_Rail_Class_195
331s work Liverpool - Blackpool and Doncaster - Leeds
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/British_Rail_Class_331
And the Northern 142s should end this year or early next year
Peter
Re: DTG Class 142 pacer
Posted: Sat Oct 05, 2019 4:22 pm
by Springer6
Peter, ,,,Yes, I know. What the guard meant was, those units were not yet in service on the Manchester -Southport route.
I understand that the 142s on this route are not scheduled for withdrawal until early 2020 . Whether that happens or not, we wait and see ? Promises have been made before.

Re: DTG Class 142 pacer
Posted: Sat Oct 05, 2019 4:45 pm
by oldstraydog
*dusts off his anorak*
The new DTG Class 142 has the earlier 4-piece concertina doors as seen on buses of the period, while the AP-Waggonz variant has the later two-piece doors. Pleasing to have a little detail variation for making up four-car sets.
Re: DTG Class 142 pacer
Posted: Sat Oct 05, 2019 5:49 pm
by USRailFan
Soo... Basically, verdict is, worth buying, but those knowledgeable about editing files should hack into the loco files to set it up for the AP sounds instead of the standard ones?
Re: DTG Class 142 pacer
Posted: Sun Oct 06, 2019 1:43 pm
by 749006
oldstraydog wrote:*dusts off his anorak*
The new DTG Class 142 has the earlier 4-piece concertina doors as seen on buses of the period, while the AP-Waggonz variant has the later two-piece doors. Pleasing to have a little detail variation for making up four-car sets.
Yes, I pointed that out on the previous page
Re: DTG Class 142 pacer
Posted: Sun Oct 06, 2019 1:48 pm
by 749006
Springer6 wrote:
Peter, ,,,Yes, I know. What the guard meant was, those units were not yet in service on the Manchester -Southport route.
I understand that the 142s on this route are not scheduled for withdrawal until early 2020 . Whether that happens or not, we wait and see ? Promises have been made before.

I'm unsure if the 195s will work on that route or if they will continue with 150, 156 + 158 units - the route is relatively slow
And I also mentioned "142s should end this year or
early next year" maybe I should have said 2020 instead of Next Year?
Peter
Re: DTG Class 142 pacer
Posted: Sun Oct 06, 2019 4:22 pm
by EEType3
oldstraydog wrote:*dusts off his anorak*
The new DTG Class 142 has the earlier 4-piece concertina doors as seen on buses of the period, while the AP-Waggonz variant has the later two-piece doors. Pleasing to have a little detail variation for making up four-car sets.
Actually the Waggonz version has both door types!
Re: DTG Class 142 pacer
Posted: Mon Oct 07, 2019 11:38 am
by 749006
EEType3 wrote:oldstraydog wrote:*dusts off his anorak*
The new DTG Class 142 has the earlier 4-piece concertina doors as seen on buses of the period, while the AP-Waggonz variant has the later two-piece doors. Pleasing to have a little detail variation for making up four-car sets.
Actually the Waggonz version has both door types!
AP/Waggons version -
https://www.armstrongpowerhouse.com/ima ... 24x576.jpg
Re: DTG Class 142 pacer
Posted: Mon Oct 07, 2019 1:00 pm
by Springer6
749006 wrote:
I'm unsure if the 195s will work on that route or if they will continue with 150, 156 + 158 units - the route is relatively slow
Peter
Yes I suspect that you may be right !!

Still, Sprinters are far better than Pacers in every respect.
Also, thanks for pointing out that the AP Waggonz version has both door types. I hadn't noticed that. It also has two types of destination displays.
I have tried the AP 142 substituted into one of the DTG version's Workshop Scenarios. Very impressed ! I had forgotten how good the AP 142 is, even with the very minor model flaws.
Re: DTG Class 142 pacer
Posted: Mon Oct 07, 2019 4:50 pm
by 749006
Springer6 wrote:I have tried the AP 142 substituted into one of the DTG version's Workshop Scenarios. Very impressed ! I had forgotten how good the AP 142 is, even with the very minor model flaws.
I have had the AP version for a few years but I hardly drive it - spent 18 years at Piccadilly on the traincrew side.
142014 was good as I could say I drove a 5x5 - one of the cars is 55555
Peter
Re: DTG Class 142 pacer
Posted: Mon Oct 07, 2019 5:44 pm
by ahunter1984
I have the Major Wales Designs Class 142 revamp pack installed, and it makes the AP/Waggonz 142 look like a completely new model IMO. The DTG version is just way too basic for my liking.
Re: DTG Class 142 pacer
Posted: Mon Oct 07, 2019 7:33 pm
by Springer6
ahunter1984 wrote:I have the Major Wales Designs Class 142 revamp pack installed, and it makes the AP/Waggonz 142 look like a completely new model IMO. The DTG version is just way too basic for my liking.
So would you recommend the Major Wales Design 142 revamp then ? I have downloaded it, but not yet installed it as I cannot quite work out what the differences are ?

Re: DTG Class 142 pacer
Posted: Tue Oct 08, 2019 6:21 am
by USRailFan
ahunter1984 wrote:I have the Major Wales Designs Class 142 revamp pack installed
Where do you get this?
Re: DTG Class 142 pacer
Posted: Tue Oct 08, 2019 6:46 am
by IronBidder
USRailFan wrote:ahunter1984 wrote:I have the Major Wales Designs Class 142 revamp pack installed
Where do you get this?
Try here:
https://www.major.wales/home
Re: DTG Class 142 pacer
Posted: Tue Oct 08, 2019 7:45 am
by ahunter1984
Springer6 wrote:ahunter1984 wrote:I have the Major Wales Designs Class 142 revamp pack installed, and it makes the AP/Waggonz 142 look like a completely new model IMO. The DTG version is just way too basic for my liking.
So would you recommend the Major Wales Design 142 revamp then ? I have downloaded it, but not yet installed it as I cannot quite work out what the differences are ?

Yes I'd recommend it. The differences are subtle, but noticeable.