Atomic Systems

brysonman46 wrote:If you look at the dates of the relevant files (the ones in the .ap archive and the ones in our asset bundle) they are the same except for NorthWalesCoastal_Markers.dcsv. The original ones number 12, with their coordinates. In the new one, there are 28 (at the moment). These include the original 12, complete with their coordinates. These route markers are not used in any scenarios, though are useful when setting up a scenario by allowing one to state a starting point. You can also use them to fly around the route very quickly. You can also use them in the original DTG\NWC, so they are a bonus, not a handicap.
Any other marker (siding, platform, portal, destination) is unique to the route, so there is no conflict

I trust that this answers your concerns

Nick

brysonman46 wrote:

smarty2 wrote:Well, I may as well be the one to start peoples eyebrows raising! installed the route and ran the batch file but it couldn't find the specified paths? Ran a scenario and there are a ton of assets missing? Is that because of the batch file? No platforms or buildings at Chester, No4 signal box is missing (just the name boards floating in the air), and some bridge decking and sides across the bridge going past the racecourse, didn't get too far past that before an access violation. Checked it with RWTools and it tells me there are over 1009 assets missing from the route, I have the original north Wales coastal as well as all the freeware packs installed plus your other route as specified in the readme?

Edit: That was interesting, just re-ran the batch file (without running it as admin) and the files copied over? Well almost, missing one, apparently, that does not appear to be in the freeware packs, JN's PJT shed?

Just checked the files and the bat file
UKTS_FP\Railway_Buildings\PJT\Scenery\Buildings2\FP_PJT_Shed_01Cr
is in both!
And FP_PJT_Shed_01 that it is based upon is in UKTS_FP\Railway_Buildings\PJT\Scenery\Buildings

sbowness wrote: Hi Nick
I've also had a problem with the FP_PJT_Shed_01.GeoPcDx file. I've got the Railway Buildings freeware pack installed. The batch file says:
K:\Steam\steamapps\common\RailWorks\Assets>copy "UKTS_FP\Railway_Buildings\JN\Scenery\Buildings\FP_PJT_Shed_01.GeoPcDx" "UKTS_FP\Railway_Buildings\JN\Scenery\Buildings2\"

That file is actually located in UKTS_FP\Railway_Buildings\PJT\Scenery\Buildings. Should another process have built the JN folder?

The asset is also in the UKTS_FP\Railway_Buildings\PJT\Scenery\Buildings2 folder included in the Assets rwp but I couldn't see a step in the batch file that copies the the GeoPcDx file into that, leaving the .bin file on it's own. Is that as intended?

sbowness wrote:Hi again, Nick.

One question, please. The manual has a section about the AP Track Enhancement Pack and says "One of our beta testers has got around this by using RW_Tools to raise the track by +0.09, and then lowering associated lineside objects (AWS, signals) by -0.05."

Does that mean that if you already have the pack installed, making those adjustments will be required?

brysonman46 wrote:

sbowness wrote:Hi again, Nick.

One question, please. The manual has a section about the AP Track Enhancement Pack and says "One of our beta testers has got around this by using RW_Tools to raise the track by +0.09, and then lowering associated lineside objects (AWS, signals) by -0.05."

Does that mean that if you already have the pack installed, making those adjustments will be required?

Have you tried any of the scenarios yet? With the enhancement pack installed? Do you find any problems with structures/ballast showing through the track, or AWS floating? If not, then you do not need to make any adjustments. Our beta tester was being very assiduous, and tried various combinations to get his view of the line to his satisfaction. I did try the pack, and was quite happy with the track and infrastructure remaining at the default position, but maybe I am not as fussy as him. At the end of the day, it is up to individual players to make their own minds up.

chrisreb wrote:Thanks for this wonderful route. Did a very atmospheric scenario and anjoyed it. Only issue I had was that only the outer half of Llandudno Plat 5 allows opening of doors

GaryT wrote:I had missing Telegraph Poles. Checked the Assets rwp and the developer folder is incomplete. Original is available from here (File Id 30726). Sorted!