Atomic Systems

Any one else having problems with missing 166 and LU stock? Ive gone down the upgrade route as already had CML. Uninstalled V103 reinstalled V104 then aylesbury. Im getting missing stock on every scenario. I have redownloaded/reinstalled both files. Cleared cache. Begiining to wonder if the upgrade file is missing dependancies..

If it helps your troubleshooting I've only got v1.04 installed, no Aylesbury extension, and I've not noticed any missing stock so far.

Andy L

P.S. Although it doesn't explain missing LU stock, not having the DTG 166 installed would cause the Chiltern 165 to not show.

The Stock is included with CML (1.04) so would suggest it's an issue at your end Doncaster40. Did you ensure you did it in the right order? I.E Installed Chiltern update THEN installed Aylesbury. Doing it any other way can cause major problems.

Thanks for the options. The correct way, via programs uninstal cannot works as its a disc from another pc so the new pc has no record of having them in the first place.
I had forgotton the way of doing it via the new instal routine !
I looked at the directories and had decided I know which directories where required to be erased anyway.
However I'll do it via the install.

Thanks all, this getting old is a real pain.
John

I had lost the installer icon from the control panel, programs and features window due to updates of Windows 10, but luckily I still had the installer for the old version of the route, so I installed the old version again, and then was able to uninstall it via the control panel, programs and features window.

Just a short review from me;

Extension is fantastic, some of the station modelling is fantastic, and it’s certainly a lovely run sharing tracks with the S8 London Underground stock. Just done the full run, to Aylesbury Vale and it’s quite an intense hour drive, very enjoyable and plenty to look out for.

Well done, JT, on an excellent extension to an already superb route.

Haven't bought as yet, but will do. I've just reinstalled the new Chiltern Line - lots of new bits there comapared to the last version I had...noticed low frames though, about 17-25, are other people noticing this? Could be my end. As soon as I turn my head away from the track I gain 50 fps on top of the base of about 20. Noticed this on both 2d and 3d track.

I had this issue before, fakenham. I created a thread a few weeks ago, I thought it was PC related but seems to be route related?

I was getting up to 35-40 FPS in places on this route, but lots of drops to 15-20 at times.

Similar experience with frame rate drops on CML v1.04 here as well, seeing 60 fps in places (60 fps max set) but as low as around 20 in others. Swapping 3D track to 2D makes little or no difference but it seems that the trees, and there are lots of them in places, might be one cause because in open country with tree lined tracks I get lower fps than in built up areas such as Marylebone.

Andy L

Yes, I am experiencing some pretty hefty stutters too, had a crash dump once even with my scenery quality set a notch below max, any more and the cab of the bubble car looks nasty! Still running the first scenario and will give my conclusion after that, looks nice enough though so far.

Do any of you get stutters if you fly around the route in a completely empty scenario?

Not tried it Gary but it has crashed three times now with an error! Terrible stuttering is spoiling it somewhat for me. Made it as far as Neasden and it was goodnight Frank.

CML itself is getting a revamp to remove a lot of 3D trees in the near future.

AYL has no issues at my end,30-40FPS constantly,yes tile load stutters but no temp dumps unless I start ticking stock.

Went through all the JT scenery folders with RWTools and reduced the lods, see if that helps? No extra stock, just what is in the scenario.

Just noted that it's been updated to version 102, much larger file size.