Page 2 of 5
Re: GWR Saint and TPO
Posted: Fri Sep 09, 2016 8:02 am
by tnleeuw01
I'd still wish that DTG would just apply that patch to the standard Riviera 50's route! I suppose that it doesn't do any harm if you apply that patch and do not have the Saint w/TPO installed?
--Tim
Re: GWR Saint and TPO
Posted: Fri Sep 09, 2016 8:55 am
by karma99
tnleeuw01 wrote:I'd still wish that DTG would just apply that patch to the standard Riviera 50's route! I suppose that it doesn't do any harm if you apply that patch and do not have the Saint w/TPO installed?
--Tim
Does no harm at all.. but without the TPO, there's really no point in it

All it does is allow those locos to pull the TPO and make it work with correctly set up line side apparatus. The TPO coach can go anywhere in the consist incidentally, so you can put any stock in between the TPO and loco and it still works although in practice it was usually near the front and definitely in front of regular passenger coaches for safety reasons.
Re: GWR Saint and TPO
Posted: Fri Sep 09, 2016 10:30 am
by anthonye
karma99 wrote:Thanks, it's been a long road to get to release but we're very pleased it's out. I've just put the BR re-skins into testing and hopefully they will be considerably quicker to get to the Marketplace.
I got the Saint today, as usual great. When the BR skins are uploaded to the Marketplace, could you post here to let us know.
Thanks
Anthony
Re: GWR Saint and TPO
Posted: Sat Sep 10, 2016 9:19 pm
by anthonye
Sorry I'm a bit confused here.
I don't see anything in the loco numbering where you can have a screw reverser instead of the lever. I see it was mentioned in the blog a couple of months ago showing a screw or a lever.
Anthony
Re: GWR Saint and TPO
Posted: Sat Sep 10, 2016 9:45 pm
by anthonye
anthonye wrote:Sorry I'm a bit confused here.
I don't see anything in the loco numbering where you can have a screw reverser instead of the lever. I see it was mentioned in the blog a couple of months ago showing a screw or a lever.
Anthony
Ignore the above, I picked the wrong loco from the list.
I must be loosing it
Anthony
Re: GWR Saint and TPO
Posted: Sun Sep 11, 2016 11:00 am
by kirkheath
Just a quick thanks for this one Pete. Only managed half an hour - hour at this point. But wanted to say, excellent job on this one. Another, amazing product like your back catalogue, love the attention to all the details that make this a very immersive drive. It's very difficult to see at night which makes it another challenge all together - ok, I cheated and left fire doors open haha. Models and the whole package is excellent. Maybe, a nice oil lamp sat on the tender to aid in cab visibility at night, would have been nice, but that is first world problems.
Re: GWR Saint and TPO
Posted: Sun Sep 11, 2016 8:06 pm
by bigmull
Got this(brilliant i must say)but it seems that the standard scenarios and the Loco itself are missing from the Menu.I have unpacked the .ap files,and extracted the .ap assets files but to no avail.It does however show up in the Quick drive menu!Am at a bit of a loss here as i am sure i have done all i can to remedy the missing scenarios and Loco.
Re: GWR Saint and TPO
Posted: Sun Sep 11, 2016 8:51 pm
by ashgray
Hi Mull
The scenarios accompanying the Saint and TPO are all career scenarios - have a look in that menu and you should find four of them.
Ash
Re: GWR Saint and TPO
Posted: Sun Sep 11, 2016 10:04 pm
by ttjph
A bit late notice as it expires tomorrow (Monday) early evening - but I presume anyone reading this thread has already seen this:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episode/b0 ... -episode-4
Re: GWR Saint and TPO
Posted: Mon Sep 12, 2016 12:55 pm
by bigmull
ashgray wrote:Hi Mull
The scenarios accompanying the Saint and TPO are all career scenarios - have a look in that menu and you should find four of them.
Ash
DOH!
Re: GWR Saint and TPO
Posted: Mon Sep 12, 2016 1:06 pm
by ashgray
bigmull wrote:ashgray wrote:Hi Mull
The scenarios accompanying the Saint and TPO are all career scenarios - have a look in that menu and you should find four of them.
Ash
DOH!
Most of us have done that, including me!
Ash
Re: GWR Saint and TPO
Posted: Mon Sep 12, 2016 1:25 pm
by karma99
ashgray wrote:bigmull wrote:ashgray wrote:Hi Mull
The scenarios accompanying the Saint and TPO are all career scenarios - have a look in that menu and you should find four of them.
Ash
DOH!
Most of us have done that, including me!
Ash
And me!
NOOOO! Where has all that work gone?!! I just saved and..... oh yeah, wrong tab

Re: GWR Saint and TPO
Posted: Sat Sep 17, 2016 12:05 pm
by cunningn
Pete et al,
I've fitted TPO apparatus on the Cambs/ECML line - and the first set work beautifully - but the gear doesn't then retract again and stays deployed for the rest of the journey (also not picking up at subsequent TPO sites). I've set them up as per the instructions - and then played around a little with finessing the exact location of Link2 and 3 to see if that makes any difference - but no joy so far. Any additional tips I can try please? I've tested using both the Saint and a modified A1 (Pete - the instructions for modding other locos are simple and easy to apply).
Regards
Neil
PS - Pete - I've got the 'Illustrated History of the Travelling Post Office' by Peter Johnson - in it he says that the warning board was placed 250 feet in advance of the apparatus - you recommend 200 yards - is this a regional difference or is one of the two a mis-transcription of feet to yards or vv.?
Re: GWR Saint and TPO
Posted: Mon Sep 19, 2016 8:34 am
by karma99
Hi Neil
I can't think of anything that would cause it to collect properly but then not retract. If you've used the Saint then it's not a loco problem so that might point to an issue with track links getting mixed up. Are they intersecting with signals or anything else that's track linked in the location you've chosen?
The GWR book I have states 200 yards so I guess it's a regional difference. In truth I'm not sure the boards were used that much, TPO crews knew exactly where they were based on locations along the track, much as footplate crews did.
Re: GWR Saint and TPO
Posted: Tue Sep 20, 2016 9:11 pm
by cunningn
Thanks anyway. One thing I've spotted that may be a factor is a diverging junction between mu link0 and the rest - I'll test it out tomorrow to see if moving the first link tidies things up. The test case I'm using actually has link0 well before a station (and diverging junction) and then link1 at the outer end of the platform so either might be causing the system to get confused.
Cheers
neil