Wycombe and Joint Line

General discussion about Train Simulator, your thoughts, questions, news and views!

Moderator: Moderators

User avatar
black8
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 1520
Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2008 9:13 am
Location: Northern Germany :( (formerly The Hague, Netherlands)

Re: Wycombe and Joint Line

Post by black8 »

Ajay1 wrote:
sean53 wrote: The missing coupling is caused by not having Kuju ticked in the route. Users who did not have the first versions of railworks will get this. Open up the route in the route editor and tick Kuju. Click on the object set filter . the little blue box on the left
Ah!!, that was it. Thanks, had a memory lapse om that one. Just checked,and indeed it was not ticked however when I tried to put a tick in the box the screen locked up with the Temp Dump Error and again the only way to reset was Ctrl-Alt-Del to bring up windows Mgr . Well I guess I'll flag this particular scenario.

Antony.
To Sean: I had the same problem with this scenario although I have had Railworks since it came out. So I don't think that this is the reason for this error.

Anthony, I had the same problem that the screen locked up but I let it go and gave it time to settle itself, did not get the temp dump error though, and the Kuju tick marks appeared after a minute or so. Since then, the 4MT pulls the coaches out of the platform. Perhaps you should try again and wait a little longer before you do Ctrl-Alt-Del.

Jos
'Why is it that the railway station is so far away from the village?'
The local pauses for a while, then replies:
'They thought it would be a good idea to build it next to the railway line.....'


(Dent Station on the Settle & Carlisle)
User avatar
Ajay1
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 1685
Joined: Sun Nov 02, 2008 4:37 pm
Location: Wellington,New Zealand

Re: Wycombe and Joint Line

Post by Ajay1 »

I don't think its a non ticked Kuju issue as I have just tried a couple of quickdrive scenarios on the route using the DT 4MT and they are fine, as is when using the 4MT on other routes.I'm perplexed as to what could be causing it not to be coupled up at the start.

Antony.
Windows 10 Home 64-bit,Intel Core i7-2600 CPU @ 340GHz,
12.00GB RAM, NVDIA GeForce GTX 660Ti
sean53
Established Forum Member
Posts: 408
Joined: Fri Dec 14, 2007 4:36 pm

Re: Wycombe and Joint Line

Post by sean53 »

Now that's thrown the proverbial cat..... At a loss to explain that. Some serious code issue somewhere I think
User avatar
92212
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 1725
Joined: Mon Feb 12, 2007 3:38 pm
Location: Isle of Wight
Contact:

Re: Wycombe and Joint Line

Post by 92212 »

Ajay1 wrote:I don't think its a non ticked Kuju issue as I have just tried a couple of quickdrive scenarios on the route using the DT 4MT and they are fine, as is when using the 4MT on other routes.I'm perplexed as to what could be causing it not to be coupled up at the start.

Antony.
But the carriages you are 'coupled to' may be using Kuju couplings. In the previous version of TS, you would get a SBHH, dump, or whatever the hell they call it these days! Anyway, I guess it's good that they are simply uncoupled, as opposed the the annoying 'dump'. Although the scenario is supplied with the Kuju box ticked, for some reason it's not on your setup. Tick it and you'll have to wait a while as it loads all that content. The Kuju folder is very bloated, which is why the route doesn't use it. However, I couldn't avoid using it on this scenario. So, tick the Kuju/RailSimulator box and wait a few minutes while is loads, save and reload the scenario.

Sorry for any inconvenience caused by this issue.

Regards
Matt@SteamSoundsSupreme
User avatar
black8
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 1520
Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2008 9:13 am
Location: Northern Germany :( (formerly The Hague, Netherlands)

Re: Wycombe and Joint Line

Post by black8 »

92212 wrote:..... Although the scenario is supplied with the Kuju box ticked, for some reason it's not on your setup. Tick it and you'll have to wait a while as it loads all that content.
Hi Matt

On my installation the boxes were not ticked either. See my previous post.

I have another issue though affecting the other scenario 'Diverted Up Freight' where you drive an 8F tender first. The smoke from the chimney as well as other steam-effects like whistle and sanders flow in the opposite direction of what they should when driving tender first. Against the driving direction so to say if you know what I mean.
Could this be a side effect of the new update to TS 2015 or is there another reason for it?

Jos
'Why is it that the railway station is so far away from the village?'
The local pauses for a while, then replies:
'They thought it would be a good idea to build it next to the railway line.....'


(Dent Station on the Settle & Carlisle)
User avatar
crumplezone
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 2276
Joined: Sat Mar 27, 2010 7:53 pm

Re: Wycombe and Joint Line

Post by crumplezone »

All custom steam effects and even DTG's own emitters have been effected by the new 3D cloud system, because for some absurb reason they have set windspeed in the config files to 2000. Matt has already elaborated on SSS's facebook page as to what the more normal settings are, but we don't know weather or not the high wind speed is related to making sure the clouds move or have the weather system cycle or if its a error on DTG's part.

The lack of any type of documentation doesn't particularly help with this matter on what developers need to know and to adjust to have it configured to the correct settings, so at this time no actual fix date as its probably going to take Chris a fair amount of time to adjust all the particle effects to the new wind speeds and 3D cloud system if DTG doesn't adjust the values in the future.

DTG was supposed to be exploring as to why the coupling issue has suddenly turned up but not heard anything as of yet, I have had issues in quick drives where as in TS2014 it wasn't present, they were supposed to be investigating on weather or not quick drives code has gone pear shaped and see if that is effecting it, as noted by Matt from DTG the quick drives are standard scenarios in essensce so the issue with QD and kuju/coupling may also carry over into standard scenarios to.

Unless DTG are forthcoming with a fix or find the issue then were stuck with enabling the bloated kuju folder and suffering 5x or more loading time.
User avatar
black8
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 1520
Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2008 9:13 am
Location: Northern Germany :( (formerly The Hague, Netherlands)

Re: Wycombe and Joint Line

Post by black8 »

Thanks Crump, that explains a lot.
'Why is it that the railway station is so far away from the village?'
The local pauses for a while, then replies:
'They thought it would be a good idea to build it next to the railway line.....'


(Dent Station on the Settle & Carlisle)
User avatar
Ajay1
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 1685
Joined: Sun Nov 02, 2008 4:37 pm
Location: Wellington,New Zealand

Re: Wycombe and Joint Line

Post by Ajay1 »

Thanks everyone, all sorted now. Don't know why or how Kuju in the Developer box was unticked in the initial install anyway was able to successfully put the ticks in and once saved reboot the scenario, low and behold the 4MT now pulls away without leaving its carriages and disgruntled passengers behind.

Antony.
Windows 10 Home 64-bit,Intel Core i7-2600 CPU @ 340GHz,
12.00GB RAM, NVDIA GeForce GTX 660Ti
User avatar
Ajay1
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 1685
Joined: Sun Nov 02, 2008 4:37 pm
Location: Wellington,New Zealand

Re: Wycombe and Joint Line

Post by Ajay1 »

Don't know if it's just me or what , I seem to be plagued with little gremlins on this one. "Brackley to Marylebone Stopper". At task 3 waiting for the Service 8 express to pass at Princes Risborough which when it approaches it is invisible except for the engine smoke and couplings that can be seen, once passed and a short distance from you it all starts to appear again. What causes this ? I'm sure I've read somewhere here before of this phenomenon . Continuing on, and when approaching West Wycombe up platform the scenario stops abruptly with the message of an AI train derailment at Long -------- Lat ------------ ( sorry wasn't quick enough to catch it ) . Anyone completed this yet?


Antony :D
Windows 10 Home 64-bit,Intel Core i7-2600 CPU @ 340GHz,
12.00GB RAM, NVDIA GeForce GTX 660Ti
User avatar
Trev123
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 4403
Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2010 9:13 pm
Location: Home Of The Americas Cup

Re: Wycombe and Joint Line

Post by Trev123 »

Just change your view to make the train appear. You may have to change it a couple of times.
Intel i5-2500K 3.3GHz Quad Core, Asus P8Z 68-V LE MB, Asus GTX 1060 Strix 6GB Gaming graphics card, Windows 10 Home 64 bit, 16gb Corsair Vengeance DDR3 ram, Viewsonic VX2452mh LED 1080P HD Monitor. Seagate Barracuda 1 TB HD, Seagate Firecuda 2 TB HD,
User avatar
black8
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 1520
Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2008 9:13 am
Location: Northern Germany :( (formerly The Hague, Netherlands)

Re: Wycombe and Joint Line

Post by black8 »

Ajay1 wrote:.... it is invisible except for the engine smoke and couplings that can be seen...
Yes this still happens every once in a while but not only in this scenario. You could change views a few times like Trev says, or sometimes all is well after you save and resume the scenario. What causes this I have no clue. I have not finshed the scenario yet but will try today and let you know.

Greets to downunder
Jos
'Why is it that the railway station is so far away from the village?'
The local pauses for a while, then replies:
'They thought it would be a good idea to build it next to the railway line.....'


(Dent Station on the Settle & Carlisle)
dledge
Been on the forums for a while
Posts: 185
Joined: Sat Oct 20, 2012 3:34 pm

Re: Wycombe and Joint Line

Post by dledge »

Ajay1 wrote: Continuing on, and when approaching West Wycombe up platform the scenario stops abruptly with the message of an AI train derailment at Long -------- Lat ------------ ( sorry wasn't quick enough to catch it ) . Anyone completed this yet?


Antony :D
I got the AI train derailment (I think for Service 10) just after West Wycombe.

Dave
jalmar
Been on the forums for a while
Posts: 182
Joined: Fri Jun 12, 2009 9:41 am
Location: Vlaardingen, The Netherlands

Re: Wycombe and Joint Line

Post by jalmar »

My player loco derailed at Aylesbury at various switches.

I like this route but I do not know where to go with all those goods-trains, no larger siding to be found. I hope that such a siding will come sometime.
In the meantime I'm having great fun.

thx
Albert
User avatar
deltic1981
Established Forum Member
Posts: 416
Joined: Thu Jun 21, 2007 5:42 pm
Location: Marsdonshire

Re: Wycombe and Joint Line

Post by deltic1981 »

sorry to post this here but is there an ETA on the hall class free pack getting updated to work with the current just trains model?
markpullinger
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 3105
Joined: Sun Jun 08, 2003 6:24 pm

Re: Wycombe and Joint Line

Post by markpullinger »

Hi, do you mean the Manor pack?
Locked

Return to “[TS] General Discussion”