I'd like to apologize for the mysterious Hall loco. That's a personal version of Kinlet and I accidentally referenced it. What scenario is it in?
Regards
Matt@SteamSoundsSupreme
They were referenced in both Brackley to Marylebone Stopper and Diverted up Freight
To build an authentic steam route with this number of custom assets is a major task. It's a superb effort and thanks to the author and to SSS for making it available as freeware.
anthonye wrote:If this is the standard of what routes should be. Perhaps payware company's should follow the example, really great this one.
I hope you are not suggesting commercial developers should distribute routes with all points had-operated! The "readme" says this will be fixed in due course but for me it is ridiculously unrealistic to have hand-operated points in running lines. I'll wait patiently for the next version, disappointing for now as I used to work on the line and was looking forward to this.
John
Perhaps you could give some feedback to SSS directly with what you feel needs to be put in order before you download the free route. I think it should have been a pay route from them, that's why I am going to make a donation to them again.
Thanks for the update Matt, That has fixed the Hall issues from the two scenarios . You did not need to be so prompt at doing so . I had hoped it may also fix the problem I am having of being unable to load the first scenario,but alas no. I still get the Temp Dump error almost as soon as I try to load it. never mind.
Antony.
Windows 10 Home 64-bit,Intel Core i7-2600 CPU @ 340GHz,
12.00GB RAM, NVDIA GeForce GTX 660Ti
I'm glad i'm not the only one that dumps to temp dump,again mine does almost as soon as it starts to load,I thought it was due me not having the DT BR Standard 4 and standard 4 Tank( I thought at one time DT did a combined pack of the 2 ) and swapping them for some thing else.
I thought £24.00 was bit much to pay to get 2 scenarios to work especially when you on a limited budget.
Thank you everyone, for this. I'ts a great free offer, going to be lot's of fun, I live in the area and coming out of Aylesbury get a genuine feel I'm in the Chilterns and could even smell the wood glue arriving at Wycombe, I notice the correct "Mollins" factory is even at Saunderton. Well done. Going to be fun taking the Blue Pullman through.
Johnr
Thanks for this latest version Matt, have just installed and can confirm that the first scenario " Brackley to Marylebone Stopper" which I could not load before getting the Temp Dump Error now loads. However a new issue has arisen with this one, once loaded you are presented with the the 4MT at the station awaiting departure, when you pull away the carriages are left behind. On closer inspection it appears to be missing the coupling chains even though the coupling screen on the HUD shows the train to be connected. Is it the same with any others who have installed the updated version?
Antony
Attachments
Windows 10 Home 64-bit,Intel Core i7-2600 CPU @ 340GHz,
12.00GB RAM, NVDIA GeForce GTX 660Ti
Something weird happening there mate. I have just installed the update and the couplings appear correctly and the carriages pull away with the train on my install.
I tried this in both TS2015 and TS2014. All OK.
The only issue I see is that damned annoying Blue Tinge to everything that TS2015 seems to add (which can be clearly seen in your screenshot as well). The graphics look lovely under TS2014, but TS2015 is seriously underwhelming.
Cheers,
Trevor
*EDIT* Just tried turning off the 'Dynamic Clouds' as some people have suggested this can be responsible for the Blue Cast in TS2015. On my install doing this certainly fixed the Blue Cast for the Wycombe Joint Line.
I fixed that coupling issue but I cant be sure I remember how but I think it is just a question of ticking relevant developer's box. Kuju, DT, maybe. Forgive me if I am wrong But I hope that was it.
Just tried the 4MT in another route and scenario and couplings are OK . Went to see if the Kuju and DT Developer box is ticked for this route but I seem to have hit a memory block as I can't now remember how to bring that up.
Antony.
Windows 10 Home 64-bit,Intel Core i7-2600 CPU @ 340GHz,
12.00GB RAM, NVDIA GeForce GTX 660Ti
Just checked the route and it's a big improvement. Unfortunatley the very tight points remain which spoil it. The author has used the wrong track rule, Falmouth track 2 which was used for the dock railway and has the very tight points. Should have used Falmouth track 1 which has the correct minimum radiuses for standard track
The missing coupling is caused by not having Kuju ticked in the route. Users who did not have the first versions of railworks will get this. Open up the route in the route editor and tick Kuju. Click on the object set filter . the little blue box on the left
sean53 wrote:
The missing coupling is caused by not having Kuju ticked in the route. Users who did not have the first versions of railworks will get this. Open up the route in the route editor and tick Kuju. Click on the object set filter . the little blue box on the left
Ah!!, that was it. Thanks, had a memory lapse om that one. Just checked,and indeed it was not ticked however when I tried to put a tick in the box the screen locked up with the Temp Dump Error and again the only way to reset was Ctrl-Alt-Del to bring up windows Mgr . Well I guess I'll flag this particular scenario.
Antony.
Windows 10 Home 64-bit,Intel Core i7-2600 CPU @ 340GHz,
12.00GB RAM, NVDIA GeForce GTX 660Ti