It wasn't one of yours - it was an RSC one - but I decided not to identify the route or author as I was only using it as an example of how things that could have been done much better can go unremarked, nothing more. The fact that so little criticism has been made of this particular route shows that the vast majority of people don't look as closely as I'm now doing. It's very easy to become over-cautious with this kind of thing and drive yourself mad trying to make the last little bit as good as it could possible be. I know that Breadsall is incomplete and know where to look for the gaps but I hadn't run over that stretch for a good few weeks until I decided to test my work for frame-rates on my weakest computer - if it runs well on that then it will run well on anything! I saw things I still need to do near to the line but was surprised that my more distant efforts looked pretty good as they are. Clearly my not running over it had altered my focus.pjt1974 wrote:I hope is wasn't mine Keith. If it was let me know. As you know, it's easy for one pair of eyes to pass something off as finished when it's not.
I'm not trying to cast aspersions in any direction. Flaws will always exist if one knows where to look but my having sympathy for the creators, stemming from my own fumbling efforts, doesn't mean I think that the Newcastle to Edinburgh route haven't messed things up and I have no doubt that JT's reputation has been damaged by it. They have messed up and it should be an example to us all to get people who've not been involved to help with the final testing. As you wrote, we all sometimes see what we want to see, not what's there, and a fresh perspective is a valuable tool.
Keith