Freightliner Class 90

[220389]

It looks nice. But for me I shall not get it though sorry. But wish you all the best though.

The same goes for the Railworkers one. (Which I'm slightly more not a fan of)

I'm not a fan of exclusive reskins, I know RSC get a lot of flak for 'them' but stock etc is included.

Chris

[gypbrc]

They're also selling a London to Brighton scenario pack at £4.50 or individual scenario packs at £0.99 which uses my reskin of the Class 377 in FCC that I supplied to Armstrong Powerhouse for use in their scenarios.

Had no idea till I just checked

[rfletcher72]

I think there's too many developers trying to make a quick buck these days.
Callum.

I tend to agree Callum I am sorry to say.

Everyone has the right to benefit from their talents if they can, and a bit of choice in the market should be welcomed. But in terms of offering the consumer a choice, those who live by the sword should be prepared to die by it also.

When I come to need a Freightliner 90 (both versions), I know at the moment where my money will be going

[CoolMatty]

Thanks for the feedback, i'll point out that i accidentally sent a slight older version of the skin to chris and did not realise it until the images went up. Alot of what has been said has been changed/is the the process of being changed, so i take the feedback very much on board. This was done as a place holder to get the basic bits down, obviously my eye went a bit wrong with the body side logo but that is being fixed. The numbers caused alot of issues but i think i have found the cause and will be getting those sorted, so if you want to send the flak somewhere, send it to me for my stupidity at sending the wrong files over! Once the update is finished and sent (correctly this time!) to chris, those who bought it will get the patch/renewed textures for free and the site pictures will be updated.

Once again, my apologies and i take all feedback onboard

Matt

[deltic009]

The texture appears almost completely flat and it looks rather unconvincing so I'm not sure it would stand up to the hard work put in to the actual model tbh.

Everyone is free to choose how or why they distribute their own work, they aren't demanding it to be bought so they are not doing any harm to anyone.

[CoolMatty]

The texture appears almost completely flat and it looks rather unconvincing so I'm not sure it would stand up to the hard work put in to the actual model tbh.

Everyone is free to choose how or why they distribute their own work, they aren't demanding it to be bought so they are not doing any harm to anyone.

The textures have changed a bit since those screenies, as i said wrong ones sent! But i do see where you are coming from and it certainly will be addressed and rechecked again before going back

Matt

[Juanillo99]

Everyone is free to choose how or why they distribute their own work, they aren't demanding it to be bought so they are not doing any harm to anyone.

Yes, you're right.
But when some developer intends to make a profit by selling a product, users have the right to demand a minimum quality of such product.

[deltic009]

Everyone is free to choose how or why they distribute their own work, they aren't demanding it to be bought so they are not doing any harm to anyone.

Yes, you're right.
But when some developer intends to make a profit by selling a product, users have the right to demand a minimum quality of such product.

Only if they are paying can they make demands. I don't tell Ferrari to for cupholders and belts for baby seats because I've got children.

[skoda]

So how does this work , Have Armstrong powerhouse/Original Author given them permission to alter their texture(s) and then make a profit from it ?
Taking someone else's work and then simple re-colouring sections of the original texture maps does not constitute a transfer of the intellectual property rights to the second party , unless it's agreed or stated by the original Author(s) .

From what I've seen the grey area exists when third party content is processed by RSC and then sold via Steam , this seems to fall under RSC's license agreements regarding reskinning (Though I'm open to correction on this point) ?

[freewarescenarios]

Hi Skoda,

I hope the post below from earlier answers your question. As Matt said, a patch is being worked on as we speak, and in relation to those that said 'sorry to be harsh' no not at all, like has already be mentioned; We are all entitled to an opinion, providing that opinion is one of a constructive kind to which all in this thread seem to have been then i'm all for it.

We have been trading now for just over two months, the quality of our Scenario Packs is something that we are very proud of, so we are certainly not here to ''make a quick buck'' this is the reason why we still upload freeware items to UKTS and offer free items on our site, this gives you choice. If you don't feel our products are up to your particular standard then as a developer we would most certainly respect that and hope you enjoy the freeware items produced instead.

I do thank you all for the comments though, it will only make us a better developer thus benefiting us all.

Hi Varney,

AP's terms and conditions of use for the Class 90 state "Persons may not modify these files in any way. These files must not be re-distributed in any form without prior permission".

Firstly, we are not distributing any files that belong to the original model created by Wagonz/Armstrong Powerhouse, the files needed to create the reskin belong to us, therefore we are merely distributing our own texture files.

Secondly, we have prior permission from Richard Armstrong to produce a reskin for his product providing the terms you mention above are met, to which they are.

I hope that clears the matter up for you and thanks for taking the time to comment

[skoda]

So from that post you are stating that you have made a brand new texture map (s) from scratch and haven't used or re-coloured any part of the original texture mapping's ?
In other words you have started with a completely blank texture and then added the textures to that so that it matches the position of the mapping on the mesh and you have not gone over the original texture map or used it as a template at any stage of the production ?

[xguerra]

So from that post you are stating that you have made a brand new texture map (s) from scratch and haven't used or re-coloured any part of the original texture mapping's ?
In other words you have started with a completely blank texture and then added the textures to that so that it matches the position of the mapping on the mesh and you have not gone over the original texture map or used it as a template at any stage of the production ?

If they didn't then would that matter, since the skin dependant on the original pack being installed?

[skoda]

The original texture shares the same intellectual property rights of the original author along with it's associated mesh . As I've already stated re-colouring it does not transfer ownership to the 2nd party unless it's been agreed or stated by the original author .

[CoolMatty]

The original texture shares the same intellectual property rights of the original author along with it's associated mesh . As I've already stated re-colouring it does not transfer ownership to the 2nd party unless it's been agreed or stated by the original author .

We do not own the model, we have been given permission by AP to reskin and distribute the reskin ONLY in this fashion. We do not sell the model itself, for the reskin (or ANY reskin for that matter) you require the original pack and the associated shape files within it.

Matt

[31160]

could anyone who has purchased the FL skins from RSC please confirm if they have dynamic numbering please?