Welcome back... long time no see!Kromaatikse wrote:I'll just mention here that I got my hands dirty with some loco overhauling for this one.
You'll have to wait and see what the results are though...
Waiting with breath suitably bated...
Moderator: Moderators
Welcome back... long time no see!Kromaatikse wrote:I'll just mention here that I got my hands dirty with some loco overhauling for this one.
You'll have to wait and see what the results are though...
rkk01 wrote:Fingers are firmly crossed for a 1980s timeframe on this route
As I posted ^^, the Virgin branding issues gives RSC problems with a post privatisation era setting (unless that has been resolved)
Don't forget, WCML(N) is also pre-privatisation as released by RSC. It is JT and AP that have provided the Virgin branded stock
Well said - I can wholeheartedly agree with thatdp123 wrote:One of the keys for a good route for me is the ability to provide a good "average" for multiple eras. WCML(N) came with pre/borderline privatisation stock, but the route itself was more post. There weren't many LED single/two aperture signals ten years ago, let alone in BR days. However, the choice of route and stock provides a good average for scenario building over multiple eras. London to Brighton is the same; all the stations may be done out in Southern green colours and with station PIS, but with a little suspension of disbelief, the route is easily useful for earlier scenarios, it hasn't changed much from BR to the present day save for the colour of the stations.
WCML Over Shap looks to me to strike this average very well, in fact it's something Keith Ross does very well as a whole. Nailing a route down to a specific era restricts the appeal of the route to the fans of said era. It's quite easy to accommodate anything post late seventies to the modern day in a single route, again with a modicum of suspension of disbelief for the minutiae (LED signal heads on WCML(N), post privatisation colours on L2B etc). Route building appears to be such a mammoth task for long mainstream routes, that an average approach is best for the wider appeal and for wider scenario building if it's a route that hasn't changed a huge amount in the last thirty years. Here is a route that can encompass BR Blue, Sectorisation, Pre-privatisation and post privatisation in a single swoop. I can easily forgive things like incorrect signals, slightly inaccurate stock, the odd siding that may have been lifted years ago in reality for the greater picture. What grates more, personally, is physics and simulation issues with stock, things that I am concentrating on whilst actually driving, and glaringly wrong things like modern FSA/FTA flats with 1960's Freightliner containers. But, these things can be corrected within the community, and have been, very well. So, I'm happy.
I can see Over Shap, and ECML to Peterborough, being winners route wise. For imaginative scenario builders like Armstrong Powerhouse, and the gifted amateurs out there, the scenario possibilities are blown wide open again.

Excellent post, couldn't agree more.dp123 wrote: One of the keys for a good route for me is the ability to provide a good "average" for multiple eras. WCML(N) came with pre/borderline privatisation stock, but the route itself was more post. There weren't many LED single/two aperture signals ten years ago, let alone in BR days. However, the choice of route and stock provides a good average for scenario building over multiple eras. London to Brighton is the same; all the stations may be done out in Southern green colours and with station PIS, but with a little suspension of disbelief, the route is easily useful for earlier scenarios, it hasn't changed much from BR to the present day save for the colour of the stations.
WCML Over Shap looks to me to strike this average very well, in fact it's something Keith Ross does very well as a whole. Nailing a route down to a specific era restricts the appeal of the route to the fans of said era. It's quite easy to accommodate anything post late seventies to the modern day in a single route, again with a modicum of suspension of disbelief for the minutiae (LED signal heads on WCML(N), post privatisation colours on L2B etc). Route building appears to be such a mammoth task for long mainstream routes, that an average approach is best for the wider appeal and for wider scenario building if it's a route that hasn't changed a huge amount in the last thirty years. Here is a route that can encompass BR Blue, Sectorisation, Pre-privatisation and post privatisation in a single swoop. I can easily forgive things like incorrect signals, slightly inaccurate stock, the odd siding that may have been lifted years ago in reality for the greater picture. What grates more, personally, is physics and simulation issues with stock, things that I am concentrating on whilst actually driving, and glaringly wrong things like modern FSA/FTA flats with 1960's Freightliner containers. But, these things can be corrected within the community, and have been, very well. So, I'm happy.
I can see Over Shap, and ECML to Peterborough, being winners route wise. For imaginative scenario builders like Armstrong Powerhouse, and the gifted amateurs out there, the scenario possibilities are blown wide open again.
Agree very much with this. Most of our railway network hasn't changed since Victorian times. Most UK services today are still running along the same routes that were laid close to the very beginning of world railway history, with the exception of ultra-modern routes like HS1.dp123 wrote:One of the keys for a good route for me is the ability to provide a good "average" for multiple eras. WCML(N) came with pre/borderline privatisation stock, but the route itself was more post. There weren't many LED single/two aperture signals ten years ago, let alone in BR days. However, the choice of route and stock provides a good average for scenario building over multiple eras. London to Brighton is the same; all the stations may be done out in Southern green colours and with station PIS, but with a little suspension of disbelief, the route is easily useful for earlier scenarios, it hasn't changed much from BR to the present day save for the colour of the stations.
WCML Over Shap looks to me to strike this average very well, in fact it's something Keith Ross does very well as a whole. Nailing a route down to a specific era restricts the appeal of the route to the fans of said era. It's quite easy to accommodate anything post late seventies to the modern day in a single route, again with a modicum of suspension of disbelief for the minutiae (LED signal heads on WCML(N), post privatisation colours on L2B etc). Route building appears to be such a mammoth task for long mainstream routes, that an average approach is best for the wider appeal and for wider scenario building if it's a route that hasn't changed a huge amount in the last thirty years. Here is a route that can encompass BR Blue, Sectorisation, Pre-privatisation and post privatisation in a single swoop. I can easily forgive things like incorrect signals, slightly inaccurate stock, the odd siding that may have been lifted years ago in reality for the greater picture. What grates more, personally, is physics and simulation issues with stock, things that I am concentrating on whilst actually driving, and glaringly wrong things like modern FSA/FTA flats with 1960's Freightliner containers. But, these things can be corrected within the community, and have been, very well. So, I'm happy.
I can see Over Shap, and ECML to Peterborough, being winners route wise. For imaginative scenario builders like Armstrong Powerhouse, and the gifted amateurs out there, the scenario possibilities are blown wide open again.

x5pgr wrote:When this route was first announced and, probably like others, I felt some degree of disappointment thinking we would just be getting Lancaster to Carlisle. Lancaster as a starting point seemed very arbitrary and operationally limiting. However once it became clear that the southern end would start at Preston suddenly a vastly increased number of possibilities came on to the agenda - Preston being the natural mid-point on the London to Glasgow route. Now that it appears that a number of branch lines are also to be included this now raises the anticipation level much higher - Lancaster to Morecombe? Oxenholme to Windermere? the various quarries around Shap? Given the expertise in route building of Mr Ross this will be a day one purchase. I am just imagining pulling into Oxenholme with the Windermere train sitting ready in the branch platform.
I was also pleased to read the most recent comments about the era. Yes we have to accept some compromises in the interests of flexibility but providing the route itself is modelled to a sufficiently high standard the immersion faction will be so good that these can easily be accepted.
My era for the WCML is BR Blue and a I spent quite a bit of time exploring the Cumbrian Fells in the 70's and early 80's. I know the Tebay to Shap section particularity well and spent many happy hours train watching at Scout Green.
Really can't wait now for the release of this one and with plenty of appropriate motive power and rolling stock to run on it already 'on shed' the potential for the scenario creators here should be massive.
The picture shows 87011 'The Black Prince' descending Shap at Scout Green with a Glasgow to Euston train on 30 May 1978 - an era when we still had proper trains with proper locomotives and hauling proper rakes of carriages!
Peter