Armstrong Powerhouse Class 321
Moderator: Moderators
-
chriscooper
- Well Established Forum Member
- Posts: 775
- Joined: Fri May 10, 2002 12:00 am
Re: Armstrong Powerhouse Class 321
Bundling the 321 with ECML would be a good business move by RSC, as they can basically give away something that they would otherwise loose sales on, and sell the 365 which is likely to sell well. In some ways it's the best way out for them , as all the work put into the 321 (other than the GA paintjob) isn't wasted, yet they aren't rekeasing a duplicate product on it's own.
Re: Armstrong Powerhouse Class 321
I would not pay for the class 365 by RSC as there policy is only one livery nowadays, i like to run routes in different times and would not be willing to payout for 3 items of traction just to get 3 liveries of the 1 product as the class 365 is not a must have train to me as it is restricted to the ECML and i could use freeware class 317 which used to work Peterborough serviceschriscooper wrote:Bundling the 321 with ECML would be a good business move by RSC, as they can basically give away something that they would otherwise loose sales on, and sell the 365 which is likely to sell well. In some ways it's the best way out for them , as all the work put into the 321 (other than the GA paintjob) isn't wasted, yet they aren't rekeasing a duplicate product on it's own.
Re: Armstrong Powerhouse Class 321
Will the 365 not just be a reskin of the 465 anyway??
Re: Armstrong Powerhouse Class 321
It is a refurbished Class 365, totally modified front end, bogies without 3rd rail kit and the pantograph etc.leesussex wrote:Will the 365 not just be a reskin of the 465 anyway??
Matthew Wilson, development team at Vulcan Productions
http://www.vulcanproductions.co.uk
https://www.facebook.com/VulcanFoundry/
http://www.vulcanproductions.co.uk
https://www.facebook.com/VulcanFoundry/
Re: Armstrong Powerhouse Class 321
I suppose for an unrefurbished 365 you could throw the pantograph coach into a 465 formation at a pinch.
-
James080400
- New to the Forums
- Posts: 1
- Joined: Sun Feb 10, 2013 2:43 pm
Re: Armstrong Powerhouse Class 321
When is it being released, is it going to be this week.
Re: Armstrong Powerhouse Class 321
It's out when it's ready 
- callum1122334455
- Well Established Forum Member
- Posts: 815
- Joined: Sat Sep 10, 2011 2:09 am
- Location: Wigan
Re: Armstrong Powerhouse Class 321
I very much doubt itJames080400 wrote:When is it being released, is it going to be this week.
The RSC one, maybe, but who knows.
Re: Armstrong Powerhouse Class 321
Are we sure RSC are doing their own, separate 321, and not just releasing a variant of AP's (like With the Class 90)?
I'm not fat - I'm easy to see
- xguerra
- Very Active Forum Member
- Posts: 2894
- Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2009 5:23 am
- Location: Hertfordshire
Re: Armstrong Powerhouse Class 321
Very sure. The two models looked significantly different.USRailFan wrote:Are we sure RSC are doing their own, separate 321, and not just releasing a variant of AP's (like With the Class 90)?
Re: Armstrong Powerhouse Class 321
Not quite, AFAIK there's still no Mk 2e DBSO (or whatever they were called)Merlin75 wrote:Now all we need a 315 and that's the passenger stock for this route done.
I'm not fat - I'm easy to see
-
secludedsfx
- Well Established Forum Member
- Posts: 635
- Joined: Fri Sep 23, 2011 9:58 pm
Armstrong Powerhouse Class 321
The MK2 DBSO's haven't ran on the line for about 10 years as when National Express took over they wanted to use 90 sets with DVT's.USRailFan wrote:Not quite, AFAIK there's still no Mk 2e DBSO (or whatever they were called)Merlin75 wrote:Now all we need a 315 and that's the passenger stock for this route done.
PC Spec: i9 10900k, 32GB DDR4 3200 RAM, GTX 980ti, 1TB NVME SSD
- Irishrailguy
- Very Active Forum Member
- Posts: 1338
- Joined: Sun Mar 21, 2010 8:58 pm
- Location: Dublin, Ireland
Re: Armstrong Powerhouse Class 321
Just because it's been 10 years doesn't mean one won't be made. I'd imagine one will make an appearance in some form for the ECML. A lot of people would be looking to use the route during intercity days and early electrification so a DBSO would be a major part of the route for that period. It's also easier to make for RSC as they have the source models of the default mk2's, so there's little trouble in making a DBSO which doesn't look different when in a rake of coaches.secludedsfx wrote:The MK2 DBSO's haven't ran on the line for about 10 years as when National Express took over they wanted to use 90 sets with DVT's.
Kev
Re: Armstrong Powerhouse Class 321
A couple of points to add, Dec 2006 was the last time a DBSO was used on passenger, but they would be a welcome vehicle as Network Rail has taken a number on for test train usage. RSC have never produced an air-conditioned mk2, so they don't quite have the right source material available. DBSOs would be a useful addition to a backdated version of Edinburgh to Glasgow for the push pull operationsIrishrailguy wrote:Just because it's been 10 years doesn't mean one won't be made. I'd imagine one will make an appearance in some form for the ECML. A lot of people would be looking to use the route during intercity days and early electrification so a DBSO would be a major part of the route for that period. It's also easier to make for RSC as they have the source models of the default mk2's, so there's little trouble in making a DBSO which doesn't look different when in a rake of coaches.secludedsfx wrote:The MK2 DBSO's haven't ran on the line for about 10 years as when National Express took over they wanted to use 90 sets with DVT's.
Kev
Matthew Wilson, development team at Vulcan Productions
http://www.vulcanproductions.co.uk
https://www.facebook.com/VulcanFoundry/
http://www.vulcanproductions.co.uk
https://www.facebook.com/VulcanFoundry/