What do you want?
Moderator: Moderators
-
jalmar
- Been on the forums for a while
- Posts: 182
- Joined: Fri Jun 12, 2009 9:41 am
- Location: Vlaardingen, The Netherlands
Re: What do you want?
German Railroads and Protrain made at least 30-40 routes, so what should be the problem for them, having far better tools now in RW ?growler37 wrote:Hi
if its french german or austrian routes your after then build them yourself,because you will wait a long time for them to be made by a commercial company etc.
Albert
- miglietto
- Been on the forums for a while
- Posts: 214
- Joined: Wed Sep 19, 2007 5:51 am
- Location: Northern Italy
Re: What do you want?
I think this thread should be splitted in two or maybe in three
- Addons
- Features
- Fixes
Ciao !
- Addons
- Features
- Fixes
Ciao !
Andrea
Re: What do you want?
...andriccardino wrote:I think this thread should be splitted in two or maybe in three
- Addons
- Features
- Fixes
Ciao !
- the World
- the rest (UK)
read you...
Michael
_______________________________
Michael
_______________________________
- growler37
- Very Active Forum Member
- Posts: 1384
- Joined: Sat Jan 12, 2002 12:00 am
- Location: KERNOW(CORNWALL)
Re: What do you want?
Hijalmar wrote:German Railroads and Protrain made at least 30-40 routes, so what should be the problem for them, having far better tools now in RW ?growler37 wrote:Hi
if its french german or austrian routes your after then build them yourself,because you will wait a long time for them to be made by a commercial company etc.
I think your refering to MSTS, if so, then RW is totally diferent,i dont know if you have ever tried route creation,but comparing MSTS route building to RW is like chalk and cheese,totaly diferent concepts,however i do agree the route building tools in RS/RW is a breeze, however simplicity of use, does not mean you can create routes faster,unless you are content with very basic scenery,as we are talking commercial routes here,imagine the outcry if a commercial company produced a route with very sparse scenery then charged £30+ for it the forums would be full of complaints.
With RS/RW being around some 16 months now,if a commercial company wanted, and felt it could make a profit producing a detailed long distance route,i feel there would be some appearing by now.
IMHO the major source of routes for RW is going to be the freeware route(pardon the pun)the commercial companys will churn out the headline grabbing(and most profitable) locos and rolling stock,and who can blame them.
In conclusion there is no point moaning about to much UK content for RW, if no one is prepared to bite the bullet and start producing routes and assets for other countries,to say there is no content for other countries is not true! surf the net and look for the USA, French,German,and other countries RS/RW web sites, there is some fantastic stuff being produced out there just go look for it!
I said before if you want a particular or favourite route,then why not have a go yourself,using Dem,its amazing how accurate and easy route building in RW can be.
With Regards
Kevin
CORNWALL THE LAND OF PASTIES AND TREVITHICK! INVENTOR OF THE STEAM LOCO.
BUILDER OF THE WEST SOMERSET RAILWAY ROUTE FOR RS.
PENZANCE TO PLYMOUTH,MODERN,IN PROGRESS.
THE HELSTON BRANCH AND WEST CORNWALL IN THE 1950,S,IN PROGRESS.
BUILDER OF THE WEST SOMERSET RAILWAY ROUTE FOR RS.
PENZANCE TO PLYMOUTH,MODERN,IN PROGRESS.
THE HELSTON BRANCH AND WEST CORNWALL IN THE 1950,S,IN PROGRESS.
Re: What do you want?
well id like to see them making it possible to move around freely in the cab, and making it possible to open windows and dorrs etc on the built in stock, i might be boring but i think that it would add some realism.
-
davidhossack
- Well Established Forum Member
- Posts: 668
- Joined: Sun Jun 01, 2008 2:21 pm
- Location: North London
- Contact:
Re: What do you want?
I have been thinking long and hard about what would be good to have. Since I am a modern traction fan I would like a class 92 (as an alteration of the 60), a class 67 and a Mk3 DVT(although we would need it to go with either a 87 or 90-which is hopefully coming from OOVEE). I would also like routes like the S&C
Re: What do you want?
ye a class 67 would be cool
Re: What do you want?
Got to ask; what more than you can already? I mean, you can already move between the seats...Mackan wrote:well id like to see them making it possible to move around freely in the cab
Possibly getting further away from what's generally acknowledged as coming under the banner of "simulation" and moving more into the realm of "virtual reality".and making it possible to open windows and dorrs etc on the built in stock, i might be boring but i think that it would add some realism.
Rik.
-
Trainguy76
- Very Active Forum Member
- Posts: 2053
- Joined: Mon May 25, 2009 3:28 pm
- Location: Dreamland, USA.
- Contact:
Re: What do you want?
I would like a tool that puts specific cantinary objects strung out of your choosing, like the "O wire gantry" tool under the track infrasturcture section.
But the catch is to be able to choose which gantry wire object to be laid, ie all 1 track, all double track, all 2 track and so on.
But the catch is to be able to choose which gantry wire object to be laid, ie all 1 track, all double track, all 2 track and so on.
Re: What do you want?
Wikkus wrote:Got to ask; what more than you can already? I mean, you can already move between the seats...Mackan wrote:well id like to see them making it possible to move around freely in the cab
Possibly getting further away from what's generally acknowledged as coming under the banner of "simulation" and moving more into the realm of "virtual reality".and making it possible to open windows and dorrs etc on the built in stock, i might be boring but i think that it would add some realism.
Rik.
Well, first of all, i thought the whole idea of an simulator was to make it as real as possible according to the real life situation, and ive never been in the cab of an locomotive coupeling wagons without opening the windows and leaning out to have a look at whats going on around the locomotive. So id like to see the possibility to open the window and lean out to have an look, and maybe just walk over to the handbrake in the cab of surten locomotives. becaus it doesnt strike me as beeing to real sitting 1.5 meters away from the handbreak wheal and applying it from the seat, i dont know about the length of your arms but mine arent that long.
The ability to open the windows, lean out, and look at the last wagon as you pull out from, or arrive at an station may in some situations actualy help you, yeah sure the is the shift+2 command but i think it looks rather odd having your head outside of an closed window, if you, just like me, prefer to actualy use the mouse to reglate the controll in the cab, that would add an challange if you wanted to have an look out the window to have an look at the train, as well as it would make the coupeling procedur from the cab a bit easyer since you could controll the brakes from the position where you allso overlook the end of the train and the distance to the next wagon.
Re: What do you want?
I agree, up to a point, however, what you're talking about is not at all unlike what we also see in the realm of flight simulation -- at what point does it become impractical? Full cab mockups with every lever working? Full motion rigs? It can and has been done, so I'm not disagreeing with your sentiment, I'm merely pointing out that there are limitations to what can be done within the framework as it stands. Of course, human beings are resourceful and creative, so just because the sim itself doesn't support it, doesn't mean it cannot be done by the individual or the user community.Mackan wrote: Well, first of all, i thought the whole idea of an simulator was to make it as real as possible according to the real life situation
If you want an example of the sort of thing to which I refer, check this out or perhaps, slightly more relevant, this.
My arms are particularly gibbon-like, actually. What's stopping you moving to the other side of the cab using the arrow keys to "apply the handbrake" ?and ive never been in the cab of an locomotive coupeling wagons without opening the windows and leaning out to have a look at whats going on around the locomotive. So id like to see the possibility to open the window and lean out to have an look, and maybe just walk over to the handbrake in the cab of surten locomotives. becaus it doesnt strike me as beeing to real sitting 1.5 meters away from the handbreak wheal and applying it from the seat, i dont know about the length of your arms but mine arent that long.
I sort of get what you're saying and maybe a partial fix would be to have opening windows that automatically drop down when you use "head-out" view. It's within the realms of the possible, just not sure how practical it'd be and how much people would want it.The ability to open the windows, lean out, and look at the last wagon as you pull out from, or arrive at an station may in some situations actualy help you, yeah sure the is the shift+2 command but i think it looks rather odd having your head outside of an closed window, if you, just like me, prefer to actualy use the mouse to reglate the controll in the cab, that would add an challange if you wanted to have an look out the window to have an look at the train, as well as it would make the coupeling procedur from the cab a bit easyer since you could controll the brakes from the position where you allso overlook the end of the train and the distance to the next wagon.
But, for the average enthusiast, that's a step too far, they just want to "drive trains". Conversely, there are undoubtedly people for whom this sort of modification doesn't go far enough, for whom they want to have to close circuit-breakers and pump priming handles, etc. to start the beast. Incidentally, I was (secretly*) thrilled to see that Just Trains' Class 60 has a whole raft of new, clickable switches, knobs and levers in the lovely 3D cab. Granted, many of them don't yet do anything, but hey, when the facility for SSC becomes available, the 60 will have a knob to work it.
As I mentioned before, we're at risk of getting into "the VR zone" here; the fully immersive variety, the kind that necessitates stereoscopic headsets, data gloves and all the other similarly expensive gubbins that go with it. Maybe you're more of a visionary than I, but I can't see how you'd be able to have a hand on the regulator/power-handle and have your head out the window at the same time without going down this route, where you're actually in the virtual cab and your view changes as you turn your head, it's your virtual hand that reaches out to grasp the virtual power handle, etc.
Currently, my imagination (and a re-jigged in-game camera view) fills the gap in this respect; I use the SHIFT+2 view from either side, with my mouse hand controlling where I'm looking and my left hand moving between the power and brake keys. We can already switch ends on suitably equipped locomotives, so that's what I do.
I dunno, maybe a Raildriver type unit would make it more realistic still, but there'd still be people who would grumble that it's not enough and for whom the only solution would be to build a 12-inch-to-the-foot-scale Black 5 cab in their shed, complete with boiling-water-in-the-face-generator, singed-eyebrow-module and a real fire to have the ability to cook their bacon and eggs on their shovel...
Rgds, Rik.
*Ok, not a secret any more...