WTTs

General discussion about RailWorks, your thoughts, questions, news and views!

Moderator: Moderators

msey0002
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 4527
Joined: Sun Jul 26, 2009 11:34 pm

WTTs

Post by msey0002 »

I find this website (which was very kindly disseminated to us rail simmers on this forum) extremely useful for scenarios, but does anyone know why it doesn't presently show frieght or charter services?

http://rail.staging.swlines.co.uk/?loca ... show_stp=1

kind regards,
secludedsfx
Well Established Forum Member
Posts: 635
Joined: Fri Sep 23, 2011 9:58 pm

Re: WTTs

Post by secludedsfx »

It always has shown freight so Tom must be doing an update or things behind the scenes at the moment.
PC Spec: i9 10900k, 32GB DDR4 3200 RAM, GTX 980ti, 1TB NVME SSD
User avatar
phat2003uk
SWTVR Assistant Manager
Posts: 7452
Joined: Thu Aug 08, 2002 5:52 pm

Re: WTTs

Post by phat2003uk »

I believe freight times have been withdrawn to avoid any friction with Network Rail in coming to an agreement to publish them with their permission.
msey0002
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 4527
Joined: Sun Jul 26, 2009 11:34 pm

Re: WTTs

Post by msey0002 »

phat2003uk wrote:I believe freight times have been withdrawn to avoid any friction with Network Rail in coming to an agreement to publish them with their permission.
Thanks Richard. Do you know if this is likely to be resolved in the future?
User avatar
Dave4468
Well Established Forum Member
Posts: 859
Joined: Tue Jan 24, 2012 10:15 pm
Location: Norwich

Re: WTTs

Post by Dave4468 »

I'm getting very confused by this. Both this and Open Train Times have had to stop showing freight timings for free but NR (or whoever is causing the problems) are fine with Freightmaster making a profit off selling the same info.
If only all problems on the big railway could simply be TAB'd past...
User avatar
bdy26
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 3854
Joined: Thu Oct 07, 2004 8:34 pm
Location: Manchester, rain.

WTTs

Post by bdy26 »

I do know why, and have been directly involved in discussions on this but unfortunately can't say more.

The commercial world is surprisingly sensitive to thing that are surprising that are regarded as sensitive. I am optimistic that such information will be available to all in due course and understand that NR's view is in principle that information aside from nuclear flask and Royal Train workings should be freely available.

Be patient, i expect things will be better soon.

B
http://bdy26.co.uk/sbhh/

Builder of The Cockermouth Keswick and Penrith Railway and Lancaster to Carlisle for RW; purveyor of dirty diesels to Vulcan Productions.
AndyUK
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 3135
Joined: Thu Aug 15, 2002 7:57 pm

Re: WTTs

Post by AndyUK »

AFAIK Freightmaster don't get the info from Network Rail sources.

Andy L
msey0002
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 4527
Joined: Sun Jul 26, 2009 11:34 pm

Re: WTTs

Post by msey0002 »

Good news, Ben, thanks
User avatar
yerkes
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 2545
Joined: Thu Oct 09, 2003 6:18 am
Location: Kidlington, Oxfordshire

Re: WTTs

Post by yerkes »

Just some additional background which is in the public domain: Peter Hicks of OpenTrainTimes.org posted an update on his blog about this just yesterday (http://blog.opentraintimes.com/). The gist with regard to Tom Cairns' site is that Tom has voluntarily taken down non-passenger workings while this issue is being dealt with.
Michael
User avatar
Dave4468
Well Established Forum Member
Posts: 859
Joined: Tue Jan 24, 2012 10:15 pm
Location: Norwich

Re: WTTs

Post by Dave4468 »

Ah, thanks, makes the whole state of affairs slightly clearer. We are now looking through frosted glass rather than mud! :lol: :wink:
If only all problems on the big railway could simply be TAB'd past...
User avatar
FoggyMorning
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 5382
Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2010 1:16 am
Location: In the not too distant future, next Sunday A.D.

Re: WTTs

Post by FoggyMorning »

bdy26 wrote:NR's view is in principle that information aside from nuclear flask and Royal Train workings should be freely available.
I understand that it's probably best not to advertise the movement of hazardous nuclear waste, but why on earth would there be the same restriction on Royal train movements; used predominantly to ferry the Royal Family to and from public engagements :-?
User avatar
jivebunny
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 2015
Joined: Mon Jun 26, 2006 9:49 pm
Location: Brittany, France

Re: WTTs

Post by jivebunny »

FoggyMorning wrote:I understand that it's probably best not to advertise the movement of hazardous nuclear waste, but why on earth would there be the same restriction on Royal train movements; used predominantly to ferry the Royal Family to and from public engagements :-?
Presumably it's for the same reasons for which it has priority over any other train movement on the network. I'd imagine someone with a bone to pick with the UK could cause quite a bit of damage if they knew where, when and for how long the Windsors were going to be stationary on board a huge purple target that has no way of quickly moving to safety. It's the same logic behind only revealing routes for royal weddings / funerals etc at the last moment, minimising the amount of time for the baddies have to prepare themselves.

Of all the trains in movement on our rails these are the two types which a) you want to keep moving and b) you don't want to attract attention to if they do stop.

JB
"Moving half of West London would be a ridiculous amount of work."
User avatar
Dave4468
Well Established Forum Member
Posts: 859
Joined: Tue Jan 24, 2012 10:15 pm
Location: Norwich

Re: WTTs

Post by Dave4468 »

FoggyMorning wrote:
bdy26 wrote:NR's view is in principle that information aside from nuclear flask and Royal Train workings should be freely available.
I understand that it's probably best not to advertise the movement of hazardous nuclear waste, but why on earth would there be the same restriction on Royal train movements; used predominantly to ferry the Royal Family to and from public engagements :-?
Because someone could get hold of the planned route and try to cause a problem for it.

I believe there are some fairly strict rules about their signalling, things like all signals being set, trains being alongside the Royal Train for as little time as possible, clipped points, lots of things. In fact I'm believe that the Royal Train is not allowed to leave the station until the Queen (or whoever is on) has also left. Although that might be all wrong.
If only all problems on the big railway could simply be TAB'd past...
dean1986
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 1395
Joined: Tue Mar 20, 2007 8:54 pm
Location: West Wales
Contact:

Re: WTTs

Post by dean1986 »

If you want freight times join some yahoo gen groups there are people posting timings of many freight services including nuclear workings nr test train workings and also reports of the whereabouts of all locos.

Dean
User avatar
bdy26
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 3854
Joined: Thu Oct 07, 2004 8:34 pm
Location: Manchester, rain.

WTTs

Post by bdy26 »

If you read the accounts of 6233 hauling the Royal Train in Andrew Roden's book on the Duchesses, the security and info really is incredibly tight on it's workings. As a staunch republican I don't buy it either, but that is definitely the current status of info.

Not sure the old rules of a pilot engine to run 10 mins ahead and all facing points to be manually clamped still applies though!

B
http://bdy26.co.uk/sbhh/

Builder of The Cockermouth Keswick and Penrith Railway and Lancaster to Carlisle for RW; purveyor of dirty diesels to Vulcan Productions.
Locked

Return to “[RW] General RW Discussion”