This should be an interesting one...

General discussion about RailWorks, your thoughts, questions, news and views!

Moderator: Moderators

USRailFan
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 4226
Joined: Wed May 14, 2003 8:07 am
Location: Norway

This should be an interesting one...

Post by USRailFan »

http://www.railsimulator.com/newsdetail.php?Ref=392

Don't know how different it really is from the 4-CIG tho?
I'm not fat - I'm easy to see
User avatar
smarty2
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 9976
Joined: Sun Aug 21, 2005 8:16 am
Location: 1963, at Snow Hill!
Contact:

Re: This should be an interesting one...

Post by smarty2 »

Last edited by smarty2 on Fri Mar 30, 2012 1:06 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Best Regards
Martin (smarty2)
Non technically minded individual!

Is There A God?
Dudley Bible web page
RichDawson
Been on the forums for a while
Posts: 137
Joined: Thu Oct 28, 2004 5:33 pm

Re: This should be an interesting one...

Post by RichDawson »

There's more doors and the windows are different too (probably more diffrences though). I've seen trains made up of both a 421 and 423 unit.
USRailFan
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 4226
Joined: Wed May 14, 2003 8:07 am
Location: Norway

Re: This should be an interesting one...

Post by USRailFan »

So a bit like the 444 vs 450 then...
I'm not fat - I'm easy to see
ianmanson
Established Forum Member
Posts: 336
Joined: Sat Apr 24, 2004 6:43 pm

Re: This should be an interesting one...

Post by ianmanson »

Worse...theres less difference between a 423 & 421 than there is 450/444. Shame they havn't fixed the 421 completely before copy and pasting it to the 423
michaeldono
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 1071
Joined: Sat Jul 11, 2009 9:06 am

Re: This should be an interesting one...

Post by michaeldono »

They really should be fixing the 4-CIG and 450 when they have the same cabs...
Image
USRailFan
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 4226
Joined: Wed May 14, 2003 8:07 am
Location: Norway

Re: This should be an interesting one...

Post by USRailFan »

ianmanson wrote:Worse...theres less difference between a 423 & 421 than there is 450/444. Shame they havn't fixed the 421 completely before copy and pasting it to the 423
The 423 isn't due until late April - there's time to fix the 4-CIG in between now and then...
I'm not fat - I'm easy to see
User avatar
FoggyMorning
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 5382
Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2010 1:16 am
Location: In the not too distant future, next Sunday A.D.

Re: This should be an interesting one...

Post by FoggyMorning »

michaeldono wrote:They really should be fixing the 4-CIG and 450 when they have the same cabs...
The cab of the 4CIG has absolutely nothing in common with the cab of the 450? :-?

What needs fixing with the CIG anyway?
User avatar
bigvern
Chief Track Welder
Posts: 7706
Joined: Fri Jan 04, 2002 12:00 am
Location: Swindon, England

Re: This should be an interesting one...

Post by bigvern »

What needs fixing with the CIG anyway?
That annoying clicking noise... :).
User avatar
FoggyMorning
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 5382
Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2010 1:16 am
Location: In the not too distant future, next Sunday A.D.

Re: This should be an interesting one...

Post by FoggyMorning »

Aah, I'd forgotten about that
ianmanson
Established Forum Member
Posts: 336
Joined: Sat Apr 24, 2004 6:43 pm

Re: This should be an interesting one...

Post by ianmanson »

The AWS sounds. It fine if the light is green, but anything else the warning horn is wrong...
User avatar
callum1122334455
Well Established Forum Member
Posts: 815
Joined: Sat Sep 10, 2011 2:09 am
Location: Wigan

Re: This should be an interesting one...

Post by callum1122334455 »

RSC should give us a breath of fresh air and do something different instead of banging out trains that are very similar. How about an AC loco like a 90 or 92? Actually, I am kinda hoping Thomson or Ovee do a 90 and/or 92 :p
gptech
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 19585
Joined: Fri Oct 10, 2008 5:48 pm
Location: Wakefield, West Yorkshire

Re: This should be an interesting one...

Post by gptech »

callum1122334455 wrote:RSC should give us a breath of fresh air and do something different instead of banging out trains that are very similar....

..and the class 70 is similar to ????? :evil:
User avatar
callum1122334455
Well Established Forum Member
Posts: 815
Joined: Sat Sep 10, 2011 2:09 am
Location: Wigan

Re: This should be an interesting one...

Post by callum1122334455 »

gptech wrote:
callum1122334455 wrote:RSC should give us a breath of fresh air and do something different instead of banging out trains that are very similar....

..and the class 70 is similar to ????? :evil:
I was really refering to the 444 being similar to the 450 and the 4CIG being similar to the 4VEP. Funnily these are all DC traction too. Isn't there any demand for any modern AC locomotives?
AndyM77
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 1983
Joined: Tue May 08, 2007 12:16 am

Re: This should be an interesting one...

Post by AndyM77 »

callum1122334455 wrote:RSC should give us a breath of fresh air and do something different instead of banging out trains that are very similar. How about an AC loco like a 90 or 92? Actually, I am kinda hoping Thomson or Ovee do a 90 and/or 92 :p
Better pin your hopes on Thomson, at the moment Oovee aren't making any new add-ons for Railworks.
Locked

Return to “[RW] General RW Discussion”