Now that is the really bad news. I guess with moderators, it is the same problem as with content creators. Most people are happy, but don't say much about it, and a few nagging ones manage to overshadow the majority.dkightley wrote:The anti-moderator feeling has become too much for my health and sanity.
I don't think its worth saying any more....
When I first read it, I would not agree. But now that Doug posted what he did, I hail it.RSDerek wrote:How something is said is just as important as what is said.
For me, it is a different angle: What do I give the readers of my post?
I always loved it when Jim spelt it out in plain American. At least he was not shiny. I hate shiny people. And in the end, you noticed a very positive attitude, mostly at the beginning. If your focus is US freight operations, it is impossible to maintain an upbeat attitude without lying. Of course, you can go some extra mile to spell it out in nice words, but basically, you are stuffed.
I feel the same.
Now what I try to do is to weigh redundancy against information. If someone comes along asking a new question which has an old answer, I do not hesitate to repeat what I know. But if there is no need, I rely on everybody's memories of my yesterday rant. Not that I always manage to execute this plan, but it is the only thing I can think of to make the moderators' job more acceptable.
