My dinky 02

General discussion about RailWorks, your thoughts, questions, news and views!

Moderator: Moderators

zm4em
Been on the forums for a while
Posts: 157
Joined: Mon Nov 09, 2009 8:32 pm
Location: Antwerp Belgium

Re: My dinky 02

Post by zm4em »

black8 wrote:Yes, nice little engine. Needed to get used to the max of 19 mph though. Once I got used to this, it is so relaxing to putter around the yard with this 02 :lol:

One little thing, Derek. The lights go off after you couple onto wagons, engines etc, and they come back on when you uncouple. Is this normal or a (small) bug?

Cheers
Jos 8)
Strange, my 02 doesn't have this little problem! :(
User avatar
black8
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 1520
Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2008 9:13 am
Location: Northern Germany :( (formerly The Hague, Netherlands)

Re: My dinky 02

Post by black8 »

zm4em wrote:
black8 wrote:Yes, nice little engine. Needed to get used to the max of 19 mph though. Once I got used to this, it is so relaxing to putter around the yard with this 02 :lol:

One little thing, Derek. The lights go off after you couple onto wagons, engines etc, and they come back on when you uncouple. Is this normal or a (small) bug?
Cheers
Jos 8)
Strange, my 02 doesn't have this little problem! :(
I tried again and I must correct myself, when hooking up to the Class 47 the lights stay on. However, when coupling to wagons the lights go out!, funny, isn't it :o

Anyway, is there anybody else who has this problem ?
Greets
Jos 8)
'Why is it that the railway station is so far away from the village?'
The local pauses for a while, then replies:
'They thought it would be a good idea to build it next to the railway line.....'


(Dent Station on the Settle & Carlisle)
BenBlairL
Well Established Forum Member
Posts: 685
Joined: Thu Oct 15, 2009 9:47 pm

Re: My dinky 02

Post by BenBlairL »

black8 wrote:
zm4em wrote:
black8 wrote:Yes, nice little engine. Needed to get used to the max of 19 mph though. Once I got used to this, it is so relaxing to putter around the yard with this 02 :lol:

One little thing, Derek. The lights go off after you couple onto wagons, engines etc, and they come back on when you uncouple. Is this normal or a (small) bug?
Cheers
Jos 8)
Strange, my 02 doesn't have this little problem! :(
I tried again and I must correct myself, when hooking up to the Class 47 the lights stay on. However, when coupling to wagons the lights go out!, funny, isn't it :o

Anyway, is there anybody else who has this problem ?
Greets
Jos 8)
Same issue here. The lights go off on this loco, some don't for others, and the lights reverse for some.
TheDoctor303
New to the Forums
Posts: 1
Joined: Mon Jul 12, 2010 1:08 pm

Re: My dinky 02

Post by TheDoctor303 »

Help, I cant get the 02 to move off.

I put it in gear. select a direction release the brakes but pipe pressure remains at 0.0
Klaabu
Been on the forums for a while
Posts: 293
Joined: Fri Feb 15, 2008 11:34 pm
Location: Estonia

Re: My dinky 02

Post by Klaabu »

Biggest problem with this very nice looking loco is wrong physics. It is losing speed too fast on free run (gear not connected). And when going uphill it's very weak, too weak I think. I tested it uphill with 2 small IoW passanger cars (on full power) and speed dropped down dramatically. Physics need adjustments. Also I can't see any difference on free run and running with gearbox connected but power control on zero. In this situation train has to brake slowly but it is braking always no matter are there gears connected or not. Too unrealistic behavior. Sounds are okay basically but like with other RSC products distant sounds missing.
zm4em
Been on the forums for a while
Posts: 157
Joined: Mon Nov 09, 2009 8:32 pm
Location: Antwerp Belgium

Re: My dinky 02

Post by zm4em »

black8 wrote:
zm4em wrote:
black8 wrote:Yes, nice little engine. Needed to get used to the max of 19 mph though. Once I got used to this, it is so relaxing to putter around the yard with this 02 :lol:

One little thing, Derek. The lights go off after you couple onto wagons, engines etc, and they come back on when you uncouple. Is this normal or a (small) bug?
Cheers
Jos 8)
Strange, my 02 doesn't have this little problem! :(
I tried again and I must correct myself, when hooking up to the Class 47 the lights stay on. However, when coupling to wagons the lights go out!, funny, isn't it :o

Anyway, is there anybody else who has this problem ?
Greets
Jos 8)
Just discovered that I also have the problem but only when I couple the engines or wagons to the front of the 02.

But when there are already wagons coupled to the back the lights stay on .

Grtz
Erik
RSAdam
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 1152
Joined: Mon Sep 12, 2005 12:05 pm

Re: My dinky 02

Post by RSAdam »

Klaabu wrote:Biggest problem with this very nice looking loco is wrong physics. It is losing speed too fast on free run (gear not connected). And when going uphill it's very weak, too weak I think. I tested it uphill with 2 small IoW passanger cars (on full power) and speed dropped down dramatically. Physics need adjustments. Also I can't see any difference on free run and running with gearbox connected but power control on zero. In this situation train has to brake slowly but it is braking always no matter are there gears connected or not. Too unrealistic behavior. Sounds are okay basically but like with other RSC products distant sounds missing.
Hiya,

Be sure to email support@railsimulator.com with all the correct data that should be in place. Not really much use just say 'its wrong' without saying how, why or providing direction to what it should be capable of.

At the moment it just looks like you 'think' its wrong.

Regards
User avatar
black8
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 1520
Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2008 9:13 am
Location: Northern Germany :( (formerly The Hague, Netherlands)

Re: My dinky 02

Post by black8 »

Hi Adam

What do you think about the loco lights problems that some of us have. Should this be reported to support@railsimulator.com too?
Thanks
Jos 8)
'Why is it that the railway station is so far away from the village?'
The local pauses for a while, then replies:
'They thought it would be a good idea to build it next to the railway line.....'


(Dent Station on the Settle & Carlisle)
User avatar
bristolian
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 1695
Joined: Thu Dec 18, 2003 10:02 pm
Location: St Ives, Cambs (Formerly from Bristol)
Contact:

Re: My dinky 02

Post by bristolian »

RSAdam wrote:
Klaabu wrote:Biggest problem with this very nice looking loco is wrong physics. It is losing speed too fast on free run (gear not connected). And when going uphill it's very weak, too weak I think. I tested it uphill with 2 small IoW passanger cars (on full power) and speed dropped down dramatically. Physics need adjustments. Also I can't see any difference on free run and running with gearbox connected but power control on zero. In this situation train has to brake slowly but it is braking always no matter are there gears connected or not. Too unrealistic behavior. Sounds are okay basically but like with other RSC products distant sounds missing.
Hiya,

Be sure to email support@railsimulator.com with all the correct data that should be in place. Not really much use just say 'its wrong' without saying how, why or providing direction to what it should be capable of.

At the moment it just looks like you 'think' its wrong.

Regards

To me, this sounds just a little bit patronising Adam.
For me, the loco seems to have barely enough power to pull the skin off of a rice pudding - I couldn't get it over 2.9 mph with only a few of the Conflats attached... There is surely something amiss with the loco, and with the lighting as has been picked up on.

Very Best Wishes,
Bob.
Virtute Et Industrial!
RSAdam
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 1152
Joined: Mon Sep 12, 2005 12:05 pm

Re: My dinky 02

Post by RSAdam »

Fair enough, my apologies for appearing 'patronising'.
styckx
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 3989
Joined: Mon Jul 27, 2009 8:33 pm

Re: My dinky 02

Post by styckx »

It works fine for me. It's 100hp at the rail, 15,000 lbf. This isn't a road switcher. It's a tiny yard switcher. I yanked around 3-4 coaches no problems.
peterllamachambers
Getting the hang of things now
Posts: 70
Joined: Sat Aug 20, 2005 10:09 am

Re: My dinky 02

Post by peterllamachambers »

Dear Mr. Siddles,

In the 60's the class 08 looked very boring to me. I have really enjoyed YOUR class 08. Your Class 101, which I ride frequently in real life, takes my breath away when I load a scenario in which it features. It is the graphic quality. Your Class 02 with which I am also familiar in real life is a delight - even my wife likes it.

These things may need a bit of tweaking but I applaud what you have done and am deeply grateful for what you have done. I could not have done it. I am sad that others are less than gracious in their remarks about what you have achieved and given to the rest of us.

Best wishes, Peter
davveb
Established Forum Member
Posts: 406
Joined: Thu Oct 23, 2008 5:17 pm

Re: My dinky 02

Post by davveb »

RSAdam wrote:Fair enough, my apologies for appearing 'patronising'.
Adam
I see no need for you to apologise, your post was perfectly reasonable. Perhaps it's best if I don't pass comment on some other posts.

Dave B
Klaabu
Been on the forums for a while
Posts: 293
Joined: Fri Feb 15, 2008 11:34 pm
Location: Estonia

Re: My dinky 02

Post by Klaabu »

RSAdam wrote:
Klaabu wrote:Biggest problem with this very nice looking loco is wrong physics. It is losing speed too fast on free run (gear not connected). And when going uphill it's very weak, too weak I think. I tested it uphill with 2 small IoW passanger cars (on full power) and speed dropped down dramatically. Physics need adjustments. Also I can't see any difference on free run and running with gearbox connected but power control on zero. In this situation train has to brake slowly but it is braking always no matter are there gears connected or not. Too unrealistic behavior. Sounds are okay basically but like with other RSC products distant sounds missing.
Hiya, Be sure to email support@railsimulator.com with all the correct data that should be in place. Not really much use just say 'its wrong' without saying how, why or providing direction to what it should be capable of. At the moment it just looks like you 'think' its wrong.
My post was intended to be question to other forum members what do they think about physics of this loco. Yes I'm thinking physics are unrealistic. Locos speed can't never drop down so fast. Compare Class 02 and Class 08 free run distance. Accelerate both locos up to 10 miles per hour and release speed controller (on Class 02 also disengage gears). You can see how Class 02 stalls while 08 is running on freely. Adam this is what I suggest You to check.
Why didn't I report about it to YOur support e-mail? Because I never haven't got any feedback from RSC support. I'm even not sure is there anybody reading those e-mails at all. In this forum I'm getting always some kind of feedback and this makes a diffenerce. It's big fault RSC closed they user forums.
User avatar
Wikkus
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 3480
Joined: Tue Dec 04, 2001 12:00 am
Location: Malta

Re: My dinky 02

Post by Wikkus »

Klaabu wrote:My post was intended to be question to other forum members what do they think about physics of this loco. Yes I'm thinking physics are unrealistic. Locos speed can't never drop down so fast. Compare Class 02 and Class 08 free run distance. Accelerate both locos up to 10 miles per hour and release speed controller (on Class 02 also disengage gears). You can see how Class 02 stalls while 08 is running on freely.
Haven't tried this myself, but my first reaction is that this is not a like-for-like comparison; I am not a physicist, but surely inertia has a role to play here? You're comparing a diesel-mechanical 0-4-0 weighing 28t with a diesel-electric 0-6-0 weighing ~50t... I'd be interested to see some feedback from someone who has a better understanding/insight into both prototypical performance and the minutiae of this program.
Why didn't I report about it to YOur support e-mail? Because I never haven't got any feedback from RSC support. I'm even not sure is there anybody reading those e-mails at all.
Think what you like, but I know people do read those mails as I've corresponded over several issues and had resolution for one of them and positive feedback about two others. I've found that, just like any other product, objective and concise factual feedback with supporting evidence gets a prompt response. Polluting feedback with emotive words and antagonism does not.
It's big fault RSC closed they user forums.
I think the wider audience of what was, ostensibly, an EA product was the main reason that died out. I think they did the right thing by closing them; by the time they wound them up, they were full of nonsense, rubbish and whinging from curmudgeonly teens who would otherwise be hurling expletives at each other in BF2...

Not a lot of point in attempting to sustain like that, IMO.

Rik.
Locked

Return to “[RW] General RW Discussion”