General problems

General discussion about RailWorks, your thoughts, questions, news and views!

Moderator: Moderators

Locked
Daffer
Getting the hang of things now
Posts: 45
Joined: Sun Mar 02, 2008 11:27 am

General problems

Post by Daffer »

Hi all!

Would you sagacious members please help me with a few probs. I have class 66 downloaded and is available to most scenarios, but on the Templecombe option I have the 66 scenario taking coal from Evercreech to Radstock, which by the way is the wrong way round, the pits were at Radstock and Norton hill, there was no coal taken to Radstock. If I select free play from the Templecombe menu, class 66 is not included in the available engines. If I select the blue cube I have all the sources but no class 66, I could have a Challenger on the S&D but no 66. Can anyone offer an explanation.

The next query is if I add a loco to a train as a bunker or double header the original engine loses it's identity. I can no longer access that engine it has no name and will not respond to clicking on.

Daffer
clivejames1st
Well Established Forum Member
Posts: 570
Joined: Sun Jun 22, 2008 7:57 pm

Re: General problems

Post by clivejames1st »

Hi Daffer.

In answer to the unavailable 66 in the Free Roam have you checked the box for 66's in the RSDL folder via blue cube?
With regards to the other question i will leave that to someone more qualified to answer.

Best regards

Clive
StefanSchmidt
Established Forum Member
Posts: 374
Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2008 2:53 pm
Location: Frankonia - Bavaria - Germany

Re: General problems

Post by StefanSchmidt »

Daffer wrote:Hi all!
The next query is if I add a loco to a train as a bunker or double header the original engine loses it's identity. I can no longer access that engine it has no name and will not respond to clicking on.
Daffer
If you change a loco in the scenario editor the the driver infos get lost.
So use RW-Tools to edit scenarios, there you can add, change consist a.s.o. and no information get lost.
Stefan
Locked

Return to “[RW] General RW Discussion”