Neptune50006 wrote:Thank you for posting that film Stuart. I've not seen that one before.
I remember the big open space where the railway used to be, although I didn't know what it was at that time. I also remember the ramp, although I can't remember it having the rails in it. My Dad had a small boat with an outboard. He used to launch it from the ramp. I looked on Google Earth yesterday and see that the trackbed is now a road! We left Burnham in 1973 or 74.
It would be nice if the RW version could be extended to Burnham-on-Sea.
Glad you like it Gary. I really must get this burned on DVD, it would be a shame to lose it.
windberg, did you do it as a stand alone route or as an extension to the existing route? If the latter, if you got permission from Railsimulator.com, I suspect they wouldnt mind it being upped if it doesnt overwrite the original route. You can do that by copying it in RW tools.
As for bits being wrong, personally with my route Ive taken for the most part existing assets and used them in lieu of the real buildings. Quite often you can find something that looks similar or can be squeezed to fit. Lets be fair, much of the existing route is already like that, and nobody seems to mind too much. As for signalling and speed limits, these are a problem that can only be solved by going back to the books. Speed limits usually turn up in good books on a particular railway (and quite often you find on single lines you find they werent cleared for much more than 30 anyway). Signaling is a problem as you dont often find signaling diagrams in books, and quite often you fall back on photography to find where and what type of signals were emplaced.
On the postive side, I think due to Ivo Peters, the S and D is possibly the most photographed railway around.
My best advice to you then is, dont give up on it.