Glasgow Airport Rail Link

[FoggyMorning]

Hi, Mikel, just tried to run your scenario, and RW Tools reports this missing:

S9BL\Class390Addon\railvehicles\electric\class390\vt\vt\dmrfo\class390dmrfo.bin
S9BL\Class390Addon\railvehicles\electric\class390\vt\vt\dmso\class390dmso.bin
S9BL\Class390Addon\railvehicles\electric\class390\vt\vt\mfod\class390mfod.bin
S9BL\Class390Addon\railvehicles\electric\class390\vt\vt\mso\class390mso_b.bin
S9BL\Class390Addon\railvehicles\electric\class390\vt\vt\mso\class390mso_d.bin
S9BL\Class390Addon\railvehicles\electric\class390\vt\vt\ptfo\class390ptfo.bin
S9BL\Class390Addon\railvehicles\electric\class390\vt\vt\ptsrmb\class390ptsrmb.bin
S9BL\Class390Addon\railvehicles\electric\class390\vt\vt\tso\class390tso.bin

Which I believe is the VT class 390 reskin, which I have installed at \S9BL\Class390Addon\RailVehicles\Electric\Class390\VT

I am writing tihs to let you know that this will yield the above mentioned error for many people.

Manuel

I notice you have vt twice in the folder tree - is that as it is meant to be?

[alanch]

Hi, Mikel, just tried to run your scenario, and RW Tools reports this missing:

S9BL\Class390Addon\railvehicles\electric\class390\vt\vt\dmrfo\class390dmrfo.bin
S9BL\Class390Addon\railvehicles\electric\class390\vt\vt\dmso\class390dmso.bin
S9BL\Class390Addon\railvehicles\electric\class390\vt\vt\mfod\class390mfod.bin
S9BL\Class390Addon\railvehicles\electric\class390\vt\vt\mso\class390mso_b.bin
S9BL\Class390Addon\railvehicles\electric\class390\vt\vt\mso\class390mso_d.bin
S9BL\Class390Addon\railvehicles\electric\class390\vt\vt\ptfo\class390ptfo.bin
S9BL\Class390Addon\railvehicles\electric\class390\vt\vt\ptsrmb\class390ptsrmb.bin
S9BL\Class390Addon\railvehicles\electric\class390\vt\vt\tso\class390tso.bin

Which I believe is the VT class 390 reskin, which I have installed at \S9BL\Class390Addon\RailVehicles\Electric\Class390\VT

I am writing tihs to let you know that this will yield the above mentioned error for many people.

Manuel

I notice you have vt twice in the folder tree - is that as it is meant to be?

No - that isn't how it is meant to be. The path should be Assets\S9BL\Class390Addon\railvehicles\electric\class390\vt - one vt only.

[msdejesus]

I notice you have vt twice in the folder tree - is that as it is meant to be?

That's what I was trying to say to Mickel, that's the way he has it installed, hence RW Tools asking for these assets at that particular location, whereas I only have 1 "VT" folder, which I believe to be the correct installation of the VT repaint. At least, I haven't had any problems with several other scenarios using that particular repaint, obviously, had I been the one with un "unorthodox" installation, I would have noticed this before...

Manuel

[gypbrc]

Hmm. This one's a little harder than the 'one' ones. Needs a bit more work to get it looking reasonable.

[msey0002]

That looks brilliant, and much needed too!

[alanch]

I notice you have vt twice in the folder tree - is that as it is meant to be?

That's what I was trying to say to Mickel, that's the way he has it installed, hence RW Tools asking for these assets at that particular location, whereas I only have 1 "VT" folder, which I believe to be the correct installation of the VT repaint. At least, I haven't had any problems with several other scenarios using that particular repaint, obviously, had I been the one with un "unorthodox" installation, I would have noticed this before...

Manuel

Yes Manuel - your installation is correct, only one VT in the path. Most people will have problems with this scenario because of this.

[styckx]

Done. Ugly, yep.

[august1929]

seems such a short route and if you didnt buy the 380 its £19.99! is it worth it?

Ottodad is already in the process of declaring the route rubbish on train-sim.com, which is a guarantee that it is worth every penny, and then some. Now, if Ottodad had been praising it, on the other hand, I'd be a lot more careful with my money...

I think you will find, if you read his threads (multiple) that he is commenting that RW isn't up to coping with the accurate signalling - I have read them through again and haven't seen any complaint about GARL or the developers.

He has been modding the route to get rid of the blocked flanges and having thought that he might have messed up the route in the process (and having generated his own scenario problems as a result) deleted, and redownloaded.

I don't think there is a need to use someone's percieved negative comments as proof of the route's excellence - let it stand on its own two rails

Rod

[styckx]

Yes. Of course the entire route is broken and Railworks can't handle whatever it is four threads of screenshots prove right after you heavily edited the entire route. Duh.

[msdejesus]

Yes Manuel - your installation is correct, only one VT in the path. Most people will have problems with this scenario because of this.

Thank you! I thought I hadn't made myself clear, (English is not my native tongue)

Manuel

[USRailFan]

Yes. Of course the entire route is broken and Railworks can't handle whatever it is four threads of screenshots prove right after you heavily edited the entire route. Duh.

Ottodad in a nutshell...

[MickeL]

Yes Manuel - your installation is correct, only one VT in the path. Most people will have problems with this scenario because of this.

Thank you! I thought I hadn't made myself clear, (English is not my native tongue)

Manuel

Sorry, my bad then!

I will make an fix. Deleted my other VT map!

[MickeL]

Deleted my VT map that i had here \S9BL\Class390Addon\RailVehicles\Electric\Class390\VT

So now i only have one VT map, so download this fix and try again..

http://www.e-buzz.se/forum/showpost.php ... ostcount=2

[msdejesus]

Mickel, version 2 of the scenario has exactly the same problem as the original, I have fixed it myself in order to be able to run it, if you want, I can send you the link to the fixed version.

Manuel

[MickeL]

Mickel, version 2 of the scenario has exactly the same problem as the original, I have fixed it myself in order to be able to run it, if you want, I can send you the link to the fixed version.

Manuel

Please do that