Plagiarism in Activity Creation

Do you have anything you'd like to bring to the Site Admins attention? Suggestions? Problems etc? Please note: Beginners should go to the 'help for beginners' forum below!

Moderator: Moderators

User avatar
buffy500
Mr DMU
Posts: 6794
Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2001 12:00 am
Location: Getting on all the right people's nerves !
Contact:

Post by buffy500 »

dee4141 wrote:I don't like these type of threads. Like every other activity writer I am now asking myself is it me? Have I done something wrong? To have spent a couple of weeks - and sometimes more - trying to get an activity right for the benefit of the community and then to come across a thread like this is soul destroying. I for one am beginning to wonder if uploading to UKTS is worth the hassle ...... :cry: .
And having spent many weeks righting an activity, how would you feel if I uploaded one which was based 95% on YOUR previous hard work and clearly and prominetly claimed it was all mine without mentioning your work AT ALL ?
This is exactly what is being complained about.
Image
User avatar
BR7MT
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 3226
Joined: Tue Nov 18, 2003 8:56 pm
Location: Kent

Post by BR7MT »

Just to ram the point home - it is the credits in the readme file and the lack of seeking permission that are the points of contention.

Regards,

Dan
If at first you don't succeed, destroy all evidence that you tried :)

My uploads
User avatar
mjspeed
Been on the forums for a while
Posts: 237
Joined: Thu Feb 27, 2003 2:56 am
Location: Enfield, London
Contact:

Post by mjspeed »

Perhaps there should be some sort of rule /guideline that states that an acknowledgement needs to be made in the upload description, or readme file? And if one isn't there, then the activitiy would not be accepted for upload?
User avatar
jp4712
Petulant Princess
Posts: 4802
Joined: Mon Jul 01, 2002 6:09 pm
Location: Lichfield, Staffordshire
Contact:

Post by jp4712 »

mjspeed wrote:Perhaps there should be some sort of rule /guideline that states that an acknowledgement needs to be made in the upload description, or readme file? And if one isn't there, then the activitiy would not be accepted for upload?
Good point, but it isn't always clear for the site admin - without either a photographic memory or a huge amount of time available to check - what has been 'borrowed' from a previous activity.

The moderation team and interested parties are looking at some clear, user-friendly guidelines to get the balance right. Rather than look back I'd rather look forward to setting up some simple way forward that we can all work to. A consensus appears to be emerging that paths and consists are 'fair game' for want of a better phrase - after all you don't want paths from A to B being proliferated for no benefit - but traffic patterns and overall 'theme' are to be regarded as the IP of the originator (I stress this is my take, not an official view).

Paul

[edited to clarify my point that I was referring to site admin checking, not the uploader]
Last edited by jp4712 on Mon Nov 13, 2006 12:55 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Visit the Manchester Museum of Transport, the UK's premier bus museum
User avatar
dee4141
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 3216
Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2005 3:13 pm

Post by dee4141 »

And having spent many weeks righting an activity, how would you feel if I uploaded one which was based 95% on YOUR previous hard work and clearly and prominetly claimed it was all mine without mentioning your work AT ALL ?
This is exactly what is being complained about
I wouldn't like it. But I would write a pm to the offender or complain privately to the moderators rather than initiate a public and damaging "witchhunt" like this. This type of thread just breeds suspicion and discontent.
User avatar
buffy500
Mr DMU
Posts: 6794
Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2001 12:00 am
Location: Getting on all the right people's nerves !
Contact:

Post by buffy500 »

No witchhunt here, just seeking of clarification of the 'rules' prior to formal complaints being made.
If someone felt guilty (as sin,btw) then they knew what they were doing was wrong.
Image
User avatar
Anonymizeruk
Well Established Forum Member
Posts: 828
Joined: Thu Sep 12, 2002 3:15 pm
Location: Nottingham

Post by Anonymizeruk »

With anything that I did for UKTS release in the past, I always had something in the readme regarding permissions.

Usually went along the lines of 'do with this whatever you like, so long as you credit me for the parts that I did'

Crystal clear :)

dkightley
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 9802
Joined: Sat May 08, 2004 8:52 pm

Post by dkightley »


Just to keep everyone informed, the Moderation team are currently discussing the possiblity of an initiative to make the whole subject of copyright a lot easier to understand.

So....to quote those famous words...."Watch this space!"



Doug
User avatar
buffy500
Mr DMU
Posts: 6794
Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2001 12:00 am
Location: Getting on all the right people's nerves !
Contact:

Post by buffy500 »

Doug,

To be fair, the basics aren't rocket science even now !

Is it ALL your own work ? - Yes then no problems.
If not, does the person who's work it is agree to you using it ? If they agree no problems.


:-)
Image
User avatar
phill70
Has a sign reading.. Its NOT the end of the world!
Posts: 8767
Joined: Mon Sep 23, 2002 8:01 pm
Location: Basingstoke, where you just go around in circles and end up where you started.

Post by phill70 »

In a basic form Dave has it, not rocket science, very simple.
Glyn Phillips
User avatar
buffy500
Mr DMU
Posts: 6794
Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2001 12:00 am
Location: Getting on all the right people's nerves !
Contact:

Post by buffy500 »

And to give an example, don't take an activity that may have taken 50 or more hours to write, make changes which probably took 5 minutes at best, and then do your damright utmost to claim it all as your own work.
It may not be obvious exactly who did the work you are making use of in yours, but some statement accepting the fact that its "based on" or "uses elements of" would have gone a long long way to resolving this particular issue.
Image
User avatar
NiallGray
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 4282
Joined: Tue Jan 17, 2006 1:55 am

Post by NiallGray »

Never had a problem with it, but then up until recently I was the only one who had written any activities at all for Glasgow - Carlisle! :lol:

On a serious note, I have given permission to a couple of people to use some of my paths (and a service as well) on the basis they don't change a thing. It's not so much copyright I am worried about, it's people using something of mine, changing it slightly and thus messing up my acts already written.
The Class 303/311 pack - 26 EMUs for MSTS/OR covering every era of these iconic Clyde-based units. From Caley Blue to Carmine and Cream!
Available now on UKTS - File 34622
User avatar
depman2004
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 1276
Joined: Tue Oct 26, 2004 11:39 pm
Location: West Sussex

Post by depman2004 »

Well I was in the middle of making an activity for steyning, but this has left a sour taste now.
I dont know whether I can upload or not.

I have made a few activities recently and Im not at all bothered about credit,just as long as whoever downloaded them enjoyed them.

I can understand someone getting annoyed with an activity that took them a week, and then someone else edits it in 5 minutes and reuses it for their credit.
That would annoy me.
It took me a week to do an activity recently for the Highland mainline route and I would be annoyed if someone edited it for their credit.
But one would hope that people wouldn't do that sort of thing to an activity that was uploaded,in fact it surely is common knowledge not to tread on someone elses work.

The only other thing that kind of annoys me is that there always seems to be a little argument cropping up in the train sim community and it just makes a lot of people like myself angry and disheartened with the hobby we all enjoy.
Glory Glory Tottenham Hotspur!
Glory Glory Tottenham Hotspur!
Glory Glory Tottenham Hotspur!
And the spurs go marching on!
User avatar
mickrik
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 2043
Joined: Tue Aug 12, 2003 7:09 pm
Location: Cannock

Post by mickrik »

Hi there,

Having discovered that someone has skanked off with some of my hard work and calling it their own, I am well mad. I only found this thread an hour ago and have been digesting it. I am in absolute agreement with Dave who started the thread. I have an activity with a traffic file that took a month to prepare and I was right proud of it. To find that someone else has used it and changed the weather and it's name and the player consist and substitute a couple of AI consists. It even runs at the same time but the person was not smart enough to change the time table (Which I manually worked out) so the AI's don't quite run right.

so there's my two pennieth!!!!!!!!!!!!

Mickrik
User avatar
depman2004
Very Active Forum Member
Posts: 1276
Joined: Tue Oct 26, 2004 11:39 pm
Location: West Sussex

Post by depman2004 »

I cant understand why someone would want to do this.
Are we talking about one individual here that has done this?
Glory Glory Tottenham Hotspur!
Glory Glory Tottenham Hotspur!
Glory Glory Tottenham Hotspur!
And the spurs go marching on!
Locked

Return to “Site Admin Queries”